丹麦首相警告：美国若吞并格陵兰岛，等于北约终结

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strong response from Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen regarding Trump's comments on Greenland, emphasizing that any military action against Greenland would equate to the end of NATO as a military alliance [3][7]. Group 1: Political Reactions - Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen stated that if the U.S. were to annex Greenland, it would signify the termination of NATO, highlighting the importance of collective security within the alliance [3][7]. - Support for Denmark's stance came from various European leaders, including Norway's Foreign Minister Eide, who echoed that NATO's principles would be undermined if the U.S. attacked Greenland [7]. - Greenland's Prime Minister, Jens Frederik Nielsen, condemned the U.S. rhetoric as unacceptable and called for an end to pressure regarding the island's status [8]. Group 2: U.S. Strategy and Intentions - Trump reiterated the U.S. need for control over Greenland, citing national security concerns and the island's strategic location and resources [6][10]. - The concept of "hemispheric defense" has been emphasized by the Trump administration, shifting defense focus from global to domestic and hemispheric priorities, aligning with the "America First" agenda [10]. - The U.S. has been vocal about its interest in Greenland for over a year, indicating a persistent and serious approach rather than a fleeting interest [11]. Group 3: Economic and Geopolitical Implications - The melting Arctic ice due to climate change is making the North Sea routes commercially viable, increasing the strategic importance of Greenland [11]. - Greenland is believed to have rich mineral resources that are becoming accessible due to climate change, further heightening U.S. interest in the territory [11].