4年半亏了165亿，百亿基金经理被告上法庭

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant legal case involving Guotou Ruijin Fund and its star fund manager Shi Cheng, highlighting issues of investment style deviation and potential breaches of fiduciary duty in the public fund industry [2][5][13]. Group 1: Legal Case Overview - A court hearing is scheduled for January 13, 2026, where investor Li Zhihua has filed a lawsuit against Guotou Ruijin Fund and Shi Cheng for a "financial trust contract dispute" [2][5]. - It is rare for a fund manager to be named as a co-defendant in such cases, indicating the seriousness of the allegations against Shi Cheng [5][4]. Group 2: Investment Style and Performance Issues - The case centers on two main issues: whether the suitability obligations were adequately fulfilled and whether there was a significant deviation from the agreed investment style [5]. - Shi Cheng's management of the Guotou Ruijin New Energy Fund has come under scrutiny for drastically reducing its investment in renewable energy stocks from a contractual commitment of at least 80% to only 5.95% by Q3 2025, shifting focus to AI and robotics [5][6]. - Despite the fund's significant shift in investment strategy, it achieved a 72.24% return in 2025, raising questions about the appropriateness of the strategy and the implications for investors who expected a focus on renewable energy [5][6]. Group 3: Shi Cheng's Career Trajectory - Shi Cheng's career has seen dramatic highs and lows, with his rise closely tied to the booming renewable energy sector, achieving returns of 101.52% and 60.03% in 2020 and 2021, respectively [9][10]. - However, since 2022, the renewable energy sector has faced severe downturns, leading to significant losses for the funds he managed, with cumulative losses reaching 164.72 billion yuan from 2021 to mid-2025 [10][12]. - The management scale of his funds plummeted from over 200 billion yuan to below 100 billion yuan due to poor performance, despite continued management fee collection [12][13]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The case serves as a warning for the public fund industry regarding the boundaries of fund managers' fiduciary duties and the implications of deviating from established investment strategies [13]. - Following this case, the Asset Management Association of China issued guidelines to regulate theme-based investment styles, aiming to prevent similar issues in the future [13][16]. - The outcome of the trial could set a precedent for defining the boundaries of "diligence and responsibility" for fund managers, influencing future compliance and investment decision-making in the industry [13].