壹快评｜根除“法官隐名”背后的权力本位思想痼疾

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent issue regarding the improper redaction of judges' names and case numbers in judicial documents, which has raised public concern. The Supreme People's Court has acknowledged this mistake and called for rectification, emphasizing the need for better information transparency to uphold the public's right to know and supervise [3][4]. Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court stated that the practice of redacting judges' names and case numbers was inappropriate and has requested relevant courts to correct this issue [3]. - The article highlights that the error reflects a deeper issue of a mindset that prioritizes information concealment over transparency, indicating a significant ideological inertia within some judicial staff [4][5]. - It is noted that the misunderstanding of the source and nature of public power leads to a tendency to view public information as a privilege rather than an obligation, which undermines public trust in governmental institutions [5][6]. Group 2 - The article points out that significant progress has been made in information transparency in recent years, particularly in the judicial sector, with the establishment of the China Judgments Online platform in 2013, which has made a vast number of judicial documents accessible to the public [5][6]. - Judicial document publication has been a milestone achievement in promoting judicial fairness and accountability, and the Supreme People's Court has reaffirmed its commitment to transparency despite rumors of potential restrictions [6]. - The article concludes that continuous education, strict institutional constraints, and effective supervision are necessary to eliminate the deep-rooted issues that hinder information transparency, reinforcing the principle that power is derived from the people and information should be accessible to them [6][7].