政府投资基金“投向哪 怎么投”，国家首次作出系统规范

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the newly released guidelines by the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Science and Technology, and Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, which aim to systematically regulate the layout and investment direction of government investment funds for the first time at the national level [1] Group 1: Investment Direction and Policy Measures - The guidelines propose 14 policy measures focusing on three aspects: where to invest, how to invest, and who manages the funds [2] - Funds are required to support major strategies, key areas, and weak links where the market cannot effectively allocate resources, promoting deep integration of technological and industrial innovation [2] - Investment should align with national major plans and encourage industries listed in the national industrial directory, avoiding restricted, eliminated, or prohibited sectors [2] Group 2: Fund Management and Local Adaptation - The guidelines clarify that provincial development and reform departments will lead the formulation of local key investment area lists to optimize fund layout and direction [2] - National-level funds are to focus on supporting the construction of a modern industrial system and tackling key core technology challenges, addressing industrial shortcomings and development bottlenecks [2] - Local funds should choose investment directions based on local industrial foundations and development realities, supporting industrial upgrades, innovation capacity enhancement, and the incubation of small and micro private enterprises and technology-based companies [3] Group 3: Evaluation and Management - The National Development and Reform Commission has also developed a management approach for evaluating fund investment directions, combining positive guidance with negative constraints [3] - A comprehensive evaluation system covering the entire fund operation management process will be established, integrating both quantitative and qualitative assessments to strengthen policy guidance and regulatory management [3]