携程踩了哪些“红线”？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the investigation into Ctrip Group for alleged monopolistic practices, including requiring merchants to choose between platforms and automatic price adjustments, as reported by the National Market Supervision Administration [3][4]. Group 1: Investigation and Complaints - The National Market Supervision Administration has initiated an investigation into Ctrip for suspected abuse of market dominance under the Anti-Monopoly Law [3]. - Complaints from local regulatory bodies and businesses have highlighted Ctrip's alleged practices of requiring merchants to choose one platform ("二选一") and automatic price adjustments [2][4]. - The Yunnan Province Tourism Homestay Industry Association has documented complaints from its members regarding Ctrip's monopolistic behavior, including unfair trading conditions and price manipulation [4][5]. Group 2: Market Position and Impact - Ctrip's market share in the core travel market reached 56% by the end of 2024, and when including its strategic investment in Tongcheng Travel, the "Ctrip system" holds nearly 70% of the domestic OTA market [8]. - The association has noted that Ctrip's practices may hinder smaller and innovative platforms from gaining market access, as over 60% of online traffic for certain merchants is captured by Ctrip [6][7]. - Ctrip has made adjustments to its display rules in response to regulatory scrutiny, removing visual distinctions between different merchant categories on its platform [6].