“他们公然撒了谎”！美参议院否决限制特朗普战争权议案，白宫多线施压引担忧

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent Senate vote that narrowly defeated a war powers resolution aimed at restricting President Trump's ability to use military force against Venezuela without congressional approval, highlighting divisions within the U.S. Congress regarding Trump's foreign policy direction [3]. Division and Debate - Following the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro, some U.S. lawmakers accused the government of misleading Congress about its intentions regarding regime change in Venezuela, with specific accusations directed at Secretary of State Rubio and Defense Secretary Hegseth for allegedly lying to Congress [5]. - Senate Minority Leader Schumer emphasized the need to uphold Congress's constitutional responsibilities and effectively check presidential power, arguing that the American public does not want Trump to send troops into danger without thorough congressional debate [5]. - Senator Kaine, one of the resolution's main sponsors, argued that claiming the Venezuela action does not fall under the War Powers Resolution's definition of "imminent hostile action" is a blatant violation of reasonable interpretations of that term [5]. Concerns - The article notes that Trump has threatened military intervention in Iran amid ongoing protests and unrest, indicating a potential escalation in U.S. military involvement in the region [6][7]. - Trump reiterated his desire for the U.S. to acquire Greenland, claiming it is crucial for the U.S. missile defense system, which has raised concerns about respect for Danish territorial integrity and the self-determination of Greenland's people [7]. - A bipartisan proposal, the NATO Unity Protection Act, was introduced to prevent the U.S. Department of Defense and State Department from using funds to block, occupy, annex, or otherwise exert control over any other NATO member's territory, reflecting internal congressional concerns [7].