美媒：特朗普的“格陵兰关税”粉碎了欧盟的绥靖计划

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of Trump's sudden tariff announcement on the EU's trade agreement with South America, highlighting the internal leadership crisis within the EU and questioning its ability to protect its interests in the face of U.S. aggression [1][4][21]. Group 1: EU Leadership and Response - Ursula von der Leyen's delayed response to Trump's tariff threat has been criticized as "weak," reflecting growing dissatisfaction with her leadership within the EU [8][21]. - The failure of the EU's appeasement strategy towards the U.S. is emphasized, with officials noting that trade concessions have not yielded benefits and have left Europe vulnerable [8][10]. - The economic weakness of the EU, combined with its trade strategy, has brought it to the brink of an economic conflict with the U.S. over the Greenland issue [8][9]. Group 2: Economic Context and Challenges - The EU's single market, valued at over €20 trillion (approximately $23.2 trillion), is seen as a potential source of geopolitical power, but much of the proposed economic reforms remain unimplemented [12][21]. - The article highlights that the internal trade barriers within the EU are causing more significant trade obstacles than U.S. tariffs, indicating a need for better internal cohesion [21][22]. - Concerns are raised that without a stronger stance against the U.S., the EU may face escalating trade issues that could affect other areas of cooperation [20][21]. Group 3: Historical Context and Future Implications - Von der Leyen has previously navigated significant crises, such as coordinating vaccine procurement and managing the EU's response to the Ukraine conflict, showcasing her capability in times of challenge [15][16][17]. - However, the return of Trump to power has shifted the focus back to transatlantic trade tensions, complicating the EU's strategic positioning [18][19]. - The article concludes with a warning that the EU may need to acknowledge a potential rupture in its relationship with the U.S., with the Greenland issue serving as a critical turning point [23][24].