AI主题基金大调仓！基金经理如何看待估值“泡沫”？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance and strategic adjustments of several funds heavily invested in the artificial intelligence (AI) sector as they release their Q4 2025 reports, highlighting both consensus and divergence among fund managers regarding future investment opportunities and risks in this sector [2][3][4]. Consensus and Divergence - Fund managers show a mix of agreement and disagreement on the future of AI investments, with some maintaining significant positions in high-performing stocks while slightly reducing their holdings [3][4]. - For instance, the China Europe Digital Economy Fund achieved a 143.07% increase in 2025, with notable increases in holdings of stocks like Shengyi Technology and Inspur Information during Q4 [4]. - Conversely, leading stocks in optical modules, such as Zhongji Xuchuang and Xinyisheng, faced reductions in holdings, indicating a shift in focus among fund managers [4]. Investment Focus Areas - By the end of Q4 2025, funds are increasingly concentrating on sectors like optical communication and liquid cooling, with companies like Yingweike and Fojing Technology leading in these areas [5]. - The AI sector is projected to create significant investment opportunities in hardware devices closely linked to computing power, with expectations for increased capital expenditure on optical and storage technologies [6]. Emerging Investment Opportunities - The rapid growth of AI is expected to drive demand for electricity, with fund managers noting a potential energy crisis due to the pace of AI data center construction outstripping traditional grid expansion [7]. - There is optimism about the potential for North American power infrastructure companies to benefit from increased investments in power facilities to support large-scale computing clusters [7]. Bubble Discussion - The article addresses the ongoing debate about the valuation of AI stocks, with some fund managers arguing that while the tech growth sector has seen a recovery in valuations, many leading companies do not exhibit bubble-like characteristics [8]. - Concerns about high valuations leading to increased volatility are noted, with fund managers emphasizing the need to monitor technological advancements and business model validations closely [9][10].