从李亚鹏到陈行甲，真正的慈善不必“锦衣夜行”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the contrasting public perceptions of two charitable figures, Li Yapeng and Chen Xingjia, highlighting how their actions and circumstances have influenced public opinion and support for their charitable endeavors [3][5]. Group 1: Li Yapeng's Situation - Li Yapeng's Beijing Yanzhen Angel Children's Hospital is facing a rental crisis, with over 25 million yuan in unpaid rent leading to a court ruling for eviction [3]. - In a 31-minute video titled "The Last Face," Li shared the hospital's achievements over 13 years, including over 11,000 cleft lip and palate surgeries, with around 7,000 performed for free on children from impoverished families [3]. - Following his appeal, the Yanzhen Angel Foundation received over 23 million yuan in donations from 340,000 netizens, showcasing public sympathy and support for his charitable work [3][4]. Group 2: Chen Xingjia's Case - Chen Xingjia, a former "internet celebrity" county party secretary, faced scrutiny over his reported salaries of 900,000 yuan and 730,000 yuan for 2023 and 2024, respectively, as the founder of the Henghui Public Welfare Foundation [4]. - In response to the controversy, Chen announced he would step down and no longer receive a salary from the foundation, while highlighting the foundation's recent achievement of a 5A rating from the Ministry of Civil Affairs [4]. - Following this, he was appointed as a senior consultant for New Oriental with a salary of 1.5 million yuan, indicating a significant increase in his compensation [4]. Group 3: Public Perception and Charitable Impact - The public's support for both Li and Chen reflects a belief that their charitable contributions and capabilities warrant recognition and reward, as evidenced by the donations and salary increases [5]. - The article emphasizes the importance of transparency and recognition in charitable work, suggesting that public figures in philanthropy should openly share their contributions to inspire others [7]. - It argues for a cultural shift in how charitable actions are perceived, advocating for a system where good deeds are acknowledged and rewarded, thus encouraging more individuals to engage in philanthropy [6][7].