中方重申：日本根本没资格要求“入常”！

Core Viewpoint - Japan is deemed unqualified to assume the responsibilities of maintaining international peace and security, and thus lacks credibility in the international community, particularly regarding its bid for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council [2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context and Current Stance - The UN Security Council is highlighted as the core of the international collective security mechanism, essential for upholding post-war international order and peace [2]. - Japan's militarism has not been fully addressed, with right-wing forces in Japan attempting to glorify its invasion history and deny historical atrocities such as the Nanjing Massacre and the forced conscription of "comfort women" [2]. - Japanese leaders have shown tendencies towards militarism, including visits to the Yasukuni Shrine and advocating for nuclear armament, which pose new threats to regional and global peace [2]. Group 2: China's Position and Support for Reform - China, as a permanent member of the Security Council, expresses its commitment to safeguarding the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, advocating for constructive roles in maintaining international peace [3]. - China supports necessary and reasonable reforms of the Security Council to enhance its authority and efficiency, emphasizing the importance of increasing representation and voice for developing countries [3]. - The reform of the Security Council is framed as a critical issue that should be addressed through a comprehensive approach, with a focus on new reform ideas [3].