2025年几家自动驾驶公司的采访总结

Core Algorithm - The industry has shifted towards end-to-end solutions, moving away from modular approaches, at least in public discourse [1] - The introduction of world models is prevalent, with some companies using them to generate training data, while others incorporate them into end-to-end models to enhance performance [1][8] - There is a divergence in opinions regarding the necessity of language models (VLA) in autonomous driving, with some companies arguing that language is not essential for driving tasks [1][11] Simulation and Infrastructure - The closed-loop systems have evolved from data-driven to simulation testing and training loops [2] - 3DGS is highlighted as a crucial technology for building simulation environments, as emphasized by Tesla at CVPR 2025 [5] - Infrastructure is critical, with companies like Xiaomi and Li Auto noting its benefits for development efficiency [3][14] Organizational Capability - Organizational ability is vital, as large autonomous driving teams face significant management challenges [4] - Team culture and collaboration are emphasized as essential for overcoming complex technical and management issues [5] Technical Choices Comparison - A comparison of various companies' technical choices reveals differing approaches to core technologies and the role of world models and simulation tools [9] - Companies like Li Auto advocate for a training loop that evolves from imitation to self-learning, while NVIDIA emphasizes interpretability and reasoning in AI [9] Key Non-Core Factors - R&D infrastructure and engineering efficiency are crucial for the success of autonomous driving technologies [14] - Simulation and synthetic data are becoming essential for addressing corner cases that real-world data cannot cover [14] - The scale of computing power and chip adaptation is critical, as autonomous driving is not just a software issue but also a hardware challenge [15] User Experience and Safety - User experience and safety are paramount, with companies like Xiaomi stressing the importance of balancing advanced technology with user concerns [17] - The need for a dual-stack safety mechanism is highlighted, ensuring that even aggressive end-to-end models have a fallback to traditional rule-based systems for safety [19]