突然暴雷！一黄金预定价平台兑付困难，投资者称涉资超百亿！官方回应

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the liquidity crisis faced by the Shenzhen-based gold pricing platform "Jie Wo Rui," highlighting the significant amount of unpaid funds exceeding 10 billion yuan and the operational challenges that have arisen as a result of this situation [2][3][7]. Group 1: Financial Situation - The total unpaid funds reported by investors have surpassed 10 billion yuan, with a preliminary tally indicating an unsettled amount of 246 million yuan [3][7]. - Investors have reported difficulties in withdrawing funds, with many applications being rejected or delayed, leading to a growing queue of over 30,000 people waiting for withdrawals [5][7]. - The platform has implemented new rules limiting daily withdrawal amounts to 500 yuan or 1 gram of gold, which has not alleviated the situation for many investors [7]. Group 2: Company Background - Jie Wo Rui is owned by Shenzhen Jie Wo Rui Jewelry Co., Ltd., established in 2014, primarily engaged in the wholesale of non-ferrous metals and ores [8]. - The company originally operated as a gold raw material trader in the Shui Bei area, sourcing gold from upstream suppliers and supplying it to downstream small merchants [8]. Group 3: Regulatory Response - The Shenzhen Luohu District government has formed a task force to address the operational irregularities of Jie Wo Rui, ensuring that the company fulfills its responsibilities and communicates with investors [9]. - The company has announced plans to apply for asset supervision and has committed to not evading its responsibilities, although the specific resolution plan is still under negotiation [7][9]. Group 4: Operational Risks - Industry experts have pointed out that Jie Wo Rui's operational model, which targets retail investors, lacks adequate risk control mechanisms, leading to significant exposure to financial risks [11]. - The platform's marketing strategies, which include promotions and high-yield incentives, have attracted investors who may not fully understand the risks involved [11]. - The operational model involves separating customer deposits and claiming to hedge risks in overseas markets, which raises concerns about the transparency and verification of these transactions [11][16].