4只石油基金，提示溢价风险

Core Viewpoint - Several public fund companies, including E Fund, GF Fund, Huaan Fund, and Harvest Fund, have collectively issued announcements regarding significant premiums in the secondary market trading prices of their oil and petroleum-themed funds, urging investors to pay attention to investment risks [1][2][3]. Group 1: E Fund Announcement - E Fund's oil securities investment fund (QDII) A-class RMB shares (Fund Code: 161129) have seen a secondary market trading price significantly higher than the net asset value (NAV), with the NAV at 1.1514 RMB on January 28, 2026, and a closing price of 1.340 RMB on January 30, 2026 [1]. - Investors are warned that purchasing at a high premium may lead to substantial losses, and if the premium does not effectively decrease, the fund may apply for temporary suspension of trading on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [1]. Group 2: GF Fund Announcement - GF Fund's Dow Jones U.S. Oil Development and Production Index Securities Investment Fund (QDII-LOF) (Fund Code: 162719) has experienced a significant premium in its secondary market trading price, deviating from the previous valuation date's NAV [2]. - The fund will suspend trading from February 2, 2026, at market open until 10:30 AM, with a potential for further suspension if the premium does not decrease [2]. Group 3: Huaan Fund Announcement - Huaan Fund's S&P Global Oil Index Securities Investment Fund (LOF) (Trading Code: 160416) has also reported a significant premium in its secondary market trading price, diverging from the previous NAV [3]. - Similar to GF Fund, it will suspend trading on February 2, 2026, until 10:30 AM, with the possibility of further actions if the premium persists [3]. Group 4: Harvest Fund Announcement - Harvest Fund's oil securities investment fund (QDII-LOF) (Fund Code: 160723) has seen its secondary market trading price exceed the NAV, indicating a significant premium [3]. - Investors are cautioned against blind investments, and the fund may take measures to suspend trading if the premium does not effectively decline [3].