FT中文网精选：对特朗普的误判可以休矣

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transformation of President Trump's foreign policy approach, suggesting that he is moving away from being perceived as a populist isolationist to adopting a more interventionist stance reminiscent of Cold War-era establishment figures [6]. Group 1: Trump's Foreign Policy - Trump's initial image as a peace-oriented leader who avoids unnecessary wars is being challenged by his actions during his second term, which indicate a more aggressive foreign policy [6][7]. - Contrary to the belief that Trump would not engage in foreign conflicts, evidence shows that under his administration, the U.S. has conducted military actions in seven countries, matching the total during Obama's eight-year presidency [8]. - The frequency of U.S. airstrikes has increased significantly, with over 620 airstrikes conducted in less than a year, surpassing the 555 airstrikes during Biden's four-year term [8]. Group 2: Public Perception and Reality - The public and experts initially viewed Trump as a peace advocate, believing he would not initiate wars and could effectively end ongoing conflicts [7]. - The ongoing conflicts, such as the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Iran tensions, have contradicted the narrative of Trump as a peacekeeper, as military actions have escalated during his presidency [8].