Core Insights - Moltbook claims to be an "AI social network" with over 1.5 million AI agents, but investigations reveal only about 17,000 verified human users, indicating a ratio of 88:1 between AI agents and real users [3][42] - The platform lacks mechanisms to verify whether an "agent" is an autonomous AI or a human-controlled script, leading to concerns about the authenticity of its user base [5][41] - Security vulnerabilities were discovered, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive data, including API keys and user information, raising questions about the platform's safety and integrity [12][19][31] Group 1: Platform Overview - Moltbook operates similarly to a Reddit-style forum, where users can share links with AI agents that autonomously register, post, and interact [6][7] - The platform's creation was attributed to "atmospheric programming," where the founder did not write any code but conceptualized the architecture, which AI then implemented [10][11] Group 2: Security Vulnerabilities - Security researcher Gal Nagli discovered that a hardcoded Supabase API key allowed access to the entire production database, exposing sensitive data [14][18] - The database contained over 4.75 million records, including API keys, user emails, and private messages, with no encryption or access control [28][31][36] - The ability to modify platform content was confirmed, allowing unauthorized users to alter posts and potentially manipulate the platform's integrity [37][40] Group 3: Industry Reactions - The discovery of vulnerabilities has sparked debate about the safety of atmospheric programming and the capabilities of AI agents, highlighting the need for careful security configurations [41][42] - Industry leaders have expressed mixed views, with some seeing the platform as a significant milestone in AI interaction, while others caution against the risks posed by seemingly conscious AI [43][45]
人均操控88个AI Agent?氛围编码造出来的Moltbook数据库被扒底,网友:连很多行为可能都是人类伪造的
猿大侠·2026-02-07 04:09