刚刚！关税，重大变数！特朗普，遭“罕见谴责”！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses significant changes in Trump's tariff policy, particularly regarding tariffs on Canadian goods and the potential withdrawal from the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) [2][4][8]. Summary by Sections - Tariff Resolution: On February 11, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution opposing Trump's tariffs on Canada with a vote of 219 to 211, marking a rare public rebuke of the President's policy by a Republican-majority House [2][4]. - Reasons for Tariffs: The Trump administration justified the tariffs by claiming Canada posed a "unique and extraordinary threat" to U.S. national security due to its failure to effectively curb cross-border drug trafficking. The tariffs included a 35% duty on various Canadian goods not exempted under the USMCA [5][6]. - Threats of Increased Tariffs: Trump has threatened to impose additional tariffs, including a 50% tariff on Canadian aircraft and a potential 100% tariff on Canadian goods if Canada reaches agreements with other countries [6][8]. - USMCA Uncertainty: Reports indicate Trump is privately considering withdrawing from the USMCA, which could destabilize trade relations with Canada and Mexico, affecting approximately $2 trillion in trade and services [8][9]. - Implications of Withdrawal: Any move to exit the USMCA could lead to the re-establishment of tariff barriers, increased inflationary pressures, and disrupt supply chains that have been integrated over the past thirty years. This could also have economic repercussions in the context of upcoming midterm elections [9]. - Negotiation Dynamics: The upcoming mandatory review of the USMCA, scheduled for July 1, is now seen as contentious rather than routine. If the agreement is renewed, it could remain effective for another 16 years; otherwise, a 10-year annual review mechanism will be triggered [9][10]. - Pressure on Canada and Mexico: Trump has demanded that Canada and Mexico make concessions beyond trade, including issues related to immigration and drug trafficking, indicating a preference for bilateral agreements over multilateral ones [10].