Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of expanding exit channels for merger and acquisition (M&A) funds, particularly through better utilization of these funds [1] - It is suggested to encourage M&A funds holding quality industrial resources to collaborate with upstream and downstream companies for M&A restructuring, with a recommendation to relax regulatory requirements on performance commitments, competition, and related transactions [1] - There is a call to recognize the reasonable exit demands of M&A funds and to further improve and promote tools like S funds and successor funds to provide compliant and smooth exit channels for M&A funds nearing the end of their duration [2] Group 2 - The article advocates for guiding and encouraging M&A funds to actively participate in the integration of key industries, particularly those with significant scale effects and urgent needs for upstream and downstream industrial upgrades, such as retail, supply chain, and modern services [2] - It highlights the need to continuously optimize and improve the policy system for M&A restructuring in listed companies, addressing common pain points such as "penetration review" and "competition" faced by M&A funds when they become significant shareholders in listed companies [2]
全国政协委员、中信资本控股有限公司董事长兼首席执行官张懿宸:正视并购基金合理退出诉求 完善并推广S基金、接续基金等工具
证券时报·2026-03-07 02:11