特朗普抱怨：盟友不热心

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict in the Middle East, particularly the war involving Iran, has led to significant geopolitical tensions and economic implications, especially concerning energy prices and supply routes in the Strait of Hormuz. Group 1: U.S. and Allies' Military Involvement - President Trump has called for U.S. allies to send naval vessels to ensure the safety of oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, but has faced resistance and lack of enthusiasm from several countries [1][2] - Germany's Chancellor Merz stated that Germany would not participate in military actions to protect oil tankers, emphasizing NATO's defensive nature rather than interventionist roles [3][4] - The UK Prime Minister Starmer indicated that restoring navigation in the Strait is not an easy task and that the UK will not be drawn into a broader Middle Eastern conflict [4][5] Group 2: Responses from Other Countries - Australia has also rejected Trump's proposal, with officials stating that the country is prepared for the economic crisis stemming from the Middle East conflict, citing fuel reserves sufficient for 37 days of gasoline, 30 days of diesel, and 29 days of aviation fuel [6] - Japan is cautious about sending naval vessels to the Middle East, with officials noting that any such decision would face high thresholds due to the ongoing conflict [6] - South Korea is monitoring the situation closely and will communicate with the U.S. before deciding on any military action, while civil groups in South Korea have expressed opposition to involvement in the conflict [7][8] Group 3: European Stance - France has ruled out sending naval vessels to the Strait, maintaining a purely defensive stance and indicating no plans to deploy its aircraft carrier [9] - The EU has expressed a desire to remain uninvolved in the conflict, with officials stating that it is not Europe's war and focusing on maritime security in the Red Sea instead [10]