手办圈炸了！中国工厂控诉知名日本厂商欠钱跑路，模型被放闲鱼拍卖

Core Viewpoint - Prime 1 Studio (P1S), a high-end statue manufacturer from Japan, is facing significant backlash due to a reported debt of 1.6 million RMB (approximately 230,000 USD) owed to a Chinese factory, leading to discussions within the collectible community about the company's financial practices and integrity [1][2][15]. Group 1: Company Background - P1S was established in 2012 and is known for producing high-quality, limited-edition statues based on popular culture characters from anime, games, and movies, earning the nickname "Rolex of the statue world" among collectors [1]. - The company has collaborated with various factories, including a Chinese factory that has worked with P1S for five years, producing popular figures such as Saber from "Fate/stay night" and Optimus Prime from "Transformers" [1][5]. Group 2: Payment Dispute - On February 5, 2026, P1S signed a recovery agreement to pay 230,000 USD (approximately 1.6 million RMB) for the retrieval of finished and semi-finished products, with payment due upon loading the goods [2]. - Despite P1S providing a bank remittance slip, the payment was not received by the factory by the promised date, leading the factory to self-fund employee salaries before the Chinese New Year [4]. - After multiple unsuccessful attempts to collect the debt, the factory decided to auction off production molds to recover losses, including molds for characters like Saber [4][5]. Group 3: Community Reaction - The auction of the molds has garnered attention, with collectors expressing interest in the quality of the molds and the potential for producing similar figures domestically [6][10]. - The situation has sparked significant discussion online, with many users criticizing P1S's handling of the situation and questioning the company's integrity [12][19]. Group 4: P1S's Response - On March 18, P1S issued a statement claiming no direct legal relationship with the factory and accusing them of auctioning copyright molds and making improper claims, while stating they are pursuing legal action [15]. - However, discrepancies were noted between P1S's statements on different platforms, leading to further outrage among domestic audiences who perceived a lack of transparency [17][18][19]. - The factory's shareholders responded with evidence supporting their claims regarding the contract and payment issues, including recorded phone conversations [20].