Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of New Era Energy & Digital, Inc. due to allegations of materially misleading business information issued by the company [1]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - New Era Energy & Digital's stock fell 6.9% on December 12, 2025, following a report from Fuzzy Panda Research that criticized the company's financial practices, claiming it spent 2.5 times more on stock promotions than on operating its oil and gas wells [3]. - The report also alleged that CEO E. Will Gray II has a history of mismanaging penny stock companies over approximately 20 years [3]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Investor Rights - Investors who purchased New Era Energy & Digital securities may be entitled to compensation through a class action lawsuit, with no out-of-pocket fees or costs due to a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action to seek recovery of investor losses and encourages affected investors to join the action [2]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked highly for the number of settlements [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a leading figure in the plaintiffs' bar [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Smart Digital Group Ltd. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased SDM securities between May 5, 2025, and September 26, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 16, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Details Against Smart Digital - Smart Digital is accused of being involved in a market manipulation and fraudulent promotion scheme, which included misinformation on social media and impersonation of financial professionals [5]. - The lawsuit claims that insiders used offshore accounts to facilitate the dumping of shares during a price inflation campaign, and that Smart Digital's public statements failed to disclose risks related to fraudulent trading [5]. - As a result of these actions, Smart Digital securities faced the risk of trading suspension by the SEC and NASDAQ, leading to misleading positive statements about the company's business and operations [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Varonis Systems, Inc. common stock about a class action lawsuit with a lead plaintiff deadline of March 9, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Varonis common stock between February 4, 2025, and October 28, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - Investors wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must file a motion with the court by the specified deadline [3]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Varonis made materially false and misleading statements regarding its ability to maintain Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) projections while transitioning customers to a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model [5]. - It is claimed that Varonis was not adequately prepared to convince existing users of the benefits of the SaaS offering, leading to reduced ARR growth potential [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the misleading statements resulted in investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Blue Owl Capital Inc. securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, of the February 2, 2026, lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Blue Owl securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 2, 2026 [2] - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Blue Owl made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant issues, including pressure on its asset base from BDC redemptions and undisclosed liquidity issues [4] - It is claimed that Blue Owl was likely to limit or halt redemptions of certain BDCs, and that the defendants downplayed the severity of these issues, leading to materially misleading statements about the company's business and prospects [4]

Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased CoreWeave, Inc. securities between March 28, 2025, and December 15, 2025, of the lead plaintiff deadline on March 13, 2026 [1] - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] Class Action Details - A class action lawsuit has been filed against CoreWeave, alleging that the company made false and misleading statements regarding its ability to meet customer demand and the risks associated with reliance on a single third-party data center supplier [4] - The lawsuit claims that these misstatements were likely to have a material negative impact on CoreWeave's revenue, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [4] Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, as many firms may not have the necessary experience [3] - Rosen Law Firm has a history of significant recoveries for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements [3]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Coupang, Inc. securities between August 6, 2025, and December 16, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Coupang securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by February 17, 2026 [3] - The lawsuit alleges that Coupang made false and misleading statements regarding its cybersecurity protocols, which allowed unauthorized access to sensitive customer information [5] Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering significant amounts for investors [4] - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, including a record settlement against a Chinese company [4] Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit claims that Coupang's inadequate cybersecurity measures led to a data breach that was not reported in compliance with SEC regulations, resulting in misleading public statements [5]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Klarna Group plc about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action related to Klarna's September 2025 IPO [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 20, 2026 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement contained false or misleading statements regarding Klarna's loss reserves, which were understated, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements since 2013 [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Alvotech due to allegations of materially misleading business information issued by the company [1] Group 1: Legal Action and Investor Rights - Shareholders who purchased Alvotech securities may be entitled to compensation through a class action without any out-of-pocket fees, facilitated by a contingency fee arrangement [2] - The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action to seek recovery of investor losses related to Alvotech [2] Group 2: Company Performance and Stock Impact - On November 2, 2025, Alvotech announced that the FDA issued a complete response letter for its Biologics License Application for AVT05, citing deficiencies from a pre-license inspection of its Reykjavik manufacturing facility [3] - Following this announcement, Alvotech's stock price dropped by 34% on November 3, 2025, and nearly 4% on November 4, 2025 [3] Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked highly for settlements since 2013 [4] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering significant amounts for clients [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Smart Digital Group Ltd. during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased SDM securities between May 5, 2025, and September 26, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 16, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Specifics - Smart Digital is described as a provider of digital marketing services, and the lawsuit alleges that the company made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant risks related to market manipulation and fraudulent trading [5]. - The lawsuit claims that insiders used offshore accounts to facilitate share dumping during a price inflation campaign, and that Smart Digital's public statements omitted risks of fraudulent trading, leading to investor damages when the truth emerged [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased F5, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the F5 securities lawsuit is from October 28, 2024, to October 27, 2025 [1] - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 17, 2026 [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013 [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering significant amounts for clients [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that F5 misrepresented its revenue outlook and growth potential while downplaying risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [4] - It is claimed that F5's optimistic statements about its security capabilities were misleading, as the company was facing a significant security incident that jeopardized its future prospects [4] - The lawsuit asserts that when the true information became public, investors suffered damages due to the misleading claims made by F5 [4]