Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Ibotta, Inc. securities about a class action lawsuit related to the company's initial public offering and subsequent performance issues, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for June 16, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action pertains to securities purchased pursuant to Ibotta's registration statement during the period from April 18, 2024, to February 26, 2025 [1]. - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting the law firm [3][6]. Group 2: Allegations Against Ibotta - The lawsuit alleges that Ibotta made false or misleading statements regarding its contract with Kroger, data measurement systems, revenue generation, and client budget exhaustion, which negatively impacted revenue forecasts [5]. - Specific claims include that Ibotta did not adequately warn investors about risks associated with its contract with Kroger and that its data measurement system was not providing accurate information [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

NEW YORK, May 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Bitfarms Ltd. (NASDAQ: BITF) between March 21, 2023 and December 9, 2024, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important July 8, 2025 lead plaintiff. SO WHAT: If you purchased Bitfarms securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Avis Budget Group, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on June 24, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Avis Budget securities between February 16, 2024, and February 10, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit claims that Avis Budget made false and misleading statements regarding its fleet rotation plan, which led to significant financial impairments and losses [5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering substantial amounts for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, achieving notable recoveries, including over $438 million in 2019 [4]. Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit alleges that Avis Budget's accelerated fleet rotation plan shortened the useful life of its vehicles, resulting in billions of dollars in impairment charges and negatively impacting financial results [5].

Core Viewpoint - Civitas Resources, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements regarding its oil production and financial condition during the specified class period from February 27, 2024, to February 24, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors of the July 1, 2025 deadline to become a lead plaintiff in the class action against Civitas Resources [1][2]. - Investors who purchased Civitas securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1][2]. Group 2: Allegations Against Civitas - The lawsuit claims that Civitas made materially false and misleading statements, failing to disclose significant reductions in oil production expected in 2025 due to declines in the DJ Basin and low TIL count [3]. - It is alleged that increasing oil production would require Civitas to incur significant debt and sell corporate assets, which would disrupt its financial condition and lead to workforce reductions [3]. - The lawsuit asserts that Civitas' public statements regarding its business and financial prospects were overstated, resulting in investor damages when the true details became known [3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements and being recognized for its success in the field [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased NAPCO Security Technologies, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on June 24, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased NAPCO securities between February 5, 2024, and February 3, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by June 24, 2025 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Case Background - The lawsuit alleges that NAPCO made false and misleading statements regarding its revenue outlook and growth potential, downplaying risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [5]. - It is claimed that NAPCO's optimistic margin growth goals and reassurances about hardware sales did not align with reality, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

NEW YORK, May 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Everus Construction Group, Inc. (NYSE: ECG) between October 31, 2024 and February 11, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), including investors who held MDU Resources Group, Inc. (“MDU Resources”) common stock as of October 21, 2024 and acquired Everus Construction common stock issued in connection with the spinoff of Everus Construction on or about October 31, ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on May 26, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Actinium securities between October 31, 2022, and August 2, 2024, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6] - The deadline to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff is May 26, 2025, with the lead plaintiff acting on behalf of other class members [3] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been ranked highly for securities class action settlements [4] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Actinium made false or misleading statements regarding the likelihood of FDA approval for its Iomab-B Biologics License Application [5] - Specific claims include that data from the Sierra Trial was unlikely to meet FDA guidelines, and that positive statements made by Actinium were materially misleading [5]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Avis Budget Group, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Avis Budget securities between February 16, 2024, and February 10, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by June 24, 2025 [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Avis Budget made false and misleading statements regarding its fleet rotation plan, which negatively impacted the value of its vehicles and led to billions in impairment charges [5]. - The claims suggest that Avis Budget's financial and business prospects were overstated, resulting in investor damages when the true information became public [5].

Group 1 - The Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. securities of a lead plaintiff deadline on May 27, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] - Investors who purchased Solaris Energy securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting the Rosen Law Firm [3][6] Group 2 - The lawsuit alleges that Solaris Energy made false and misleading statements regarding its acquisition of Mobile Energy Rentals LLC, including the lack of corporate history and diversified earnings [5] - It is claimed that Solaris Energy inflated profitability metrics and overstated the commercial prospects of the MER acquisition, leading to materially misleading statements about its business and operations [5]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Perpetua Resources Corp. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on May 20, 2025 [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Perpetua securities between April 17, 2024, and February 13, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by May 20, 2025 [3] - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4] - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4] Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Perpetua's management provided misleading information regarding the expected initial capital expenditure for the Stibnite Gold Project, downplaying the impact of inflation and other cost factors [5] - The misleading statements led investors to purchase Perpetua's securities at artificially inflated prices, resulting in damages when the true costs were revealed [5]