Core Viewpoint - The State Street SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) differ significantly in yield, sector exposure, and risk, with SPLB focusing on corporate bonds for higher income potential while SCHQ offers a Treasury focus at a slightly lower cost [1][2]. Cost and Size Comparison - SPLB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while SCHQ is slightly lower at 0.03% - The one-year return for SPLB is 6.47% compared to SCHQ's 4.17% - SPLB offers a higher dividend yield of 5.2% versus SCHQ's 4.6% - SPLB has a total assets under management (AUM) of $1.2 billion, while SCHQ has $902.5 million [3]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, SPLB experienced a maximum drawdown of 34.40%, while SCHQ faced a larger drawdown of 46.13% - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $706 in SPLB and $599 in SCHQ over the same period [4]. Fund Composition - SCHQ primarily tracks the long-term U.S. Treasury bond market, holding 98 positions with 91% in government securities, indicating low exposure to corporate credit risk [5]. - SPLB invests in nearly 3,000 long-term, investment-grade U.S. corporate bonds, providing broad issuer diversification and higher credit risk, with top holdings including Anheuser Busch InBev, Meta Platforms, and CVS Health [7]. Investment Implications - Investing in SCHQ offers high credit quality and serves as a hedge against equity market volatility, making it suitable for safety and capital preservation [9][10]. - SPLB, while riskier due to its corporate bond holdings, provides higher income potential, making it attractive for those seeking diversity and income generation [11][12].

Core Insights - Investors face a choice between higher yield and long-term resilience when selecting between the State Street SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and the iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) [1] Group 1: ETF Overview - Both SPLB and LQD focus on U.S. investment-grade corporate bonds, with SPLB targeting long-term maturities of 10 years or more, while LQD covers the entire investment-grade maturity spectrum [2] - SPLB has a lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared to LQD's 0.14%, and offers a higher dividend yield of 5.2% versus LQD's 4.34% [3] - SPLB has assets under management (AUM) of $1.1 billion, significantly smaller than LQD's AUM of $33.17 billion [3] Group 2: Performance Metrics - Over the past five years, LQD has experienced a maximum drawdown of 14.7%, while SPLB's drawdown was 23.31% [4] - An investment of $1,000 in LQD would have grown to $801.52, while the same investment in SPLB would have grown to $686.55 over five years [4] Group 3: Portfolio Composition - SPLB holds 2,953 investment-grade corporate bonds with a fund life of 16.8 years, with top positions including Meta Platforms, Anheuser Busch InBev, and CVS Health [6] - LQD has a broader portfolio with 3,002 holdings, including significant positions in BlackRock Cash Fund, Anheuser Busch InBev, and CVS Health [7] - LQD's broader maturity range allows it to better withstand market volatility, particularly during periods of rising interest rates [11]