当地时间1月4日，以色列总理内塔尼亚胡在内阁会议上表示，他刚结束对美国的"历史性访问"，并与美 国总统特朗普举行"非常重要的会晤"。内塔尼亚胡称，访问期间双方展现出高度理解与认同，并认为这 有助于进一步巩固以美双边关系及双方个人层面的联系。 （文章来源：央视新闻客户端） 在伊朗问题上，内塔尼亚胡表示，美以双方重申"零铀浓缩"的共同立场，并提出需要将约400公斤浓缩 铀移出伊朗，同时对相关地点实施严格监督。 内塔尼亚胡在讲话中还谈及委内瑞拉局势，表示以色列政府支持美国"恢复自由与正义"的决定与行动， 对特朗普的决定表示祝贺，并向执行行动的美军致意。 内塔尼亚胡还说，以色列警方正推进在内盖夫地区"恢复治理"的行动，以防止当地日益严重的暴力事 件，并称将于未来几天与国家安全部长本-格维尔赴当地察看进展。 在谈及加沙问题时，内塔尼亚胡称，特朗普明确强调"根本条件是巴勒斯坦伊斯兰抵抗运动（哈马斯） 解除武装"，并称这是其"20点计划"得以落实的"必要且基本条件"，在这一点上"没有让步、没有灵活空 间"。 ...

以防长称将在加沙建立定居点 遭多方批评 一名美国官员则表示，美方仍完全致力于"20点计划"，并希望各方遵守在"20点计划"框架下作出的承 诺。该官员称，以色列越是挑衅，阿拉伯国家就越不愿与其合作。 《以色列时报》报道称，美国白宫方面似乎对卡茨作出的澄清并不满意，觉得有必要进行回应。(完) 中新社北京12月24日电 综合消息：以色列国防部长卡茨当地时间23日就在加沙地带建立定居点发表言 论，并称以色列"永远不会离开加沙"，遭到多方批评。 卡茨当日表示，以色列将在"适当的时间"通过"适当的方式"，在加沙地带北部建立由军方支持的定居 点。 据《以色列时报》报道，卡茨当日言论与以总理内塔尼亚胡的表态存在矛盾。据悉，内塔尼亚胡曾多次 表示，以色列无意在加沙地带重建定居点。 报道称，卡茨此番言论也与美国此前提出的结束加沙冲突"20点计划"相矛盾。根据"20点计划"，以色列 将撤出加沙地带，不会占领或吞并该地区。 在卡茨发表相关言论数小时后，其办公室作出澄清，称以色列政府无意在加沙地带建立定居点，并表示 卡茨的言论完全是在谈论安全事务的背景下发表的。 综合路透社与《以色列时报》报道，卡茨当日言论遭到多方批评。以色列国防军前 ...

新华社耶路撒冷12月23日电（记者冯国芮 王卓伦）据以色列媒体23日报道，特朗普政府表示，以色列 国防部长卡茨有关在加沙地带建定居点的言论正在损害推进加沙和平的努力，并可能削弱阿拉伯国家与 以方的合作意愿。 本月13日，以色列空袭加沙地带北部加沙城，炸死一名巴勒斯坦伊斯兰抵抗运动（哈马斯）高级官员。 据以色列和美国媒体报道，此举没有事先通知美方。白宫方面认为以方违反停火协议，私底下严厉警告 内塔尼亚胡，要求不要损害特朗普的信誉、影响特朗普政府的外交努力。 责编：张青津、李萌 卡茨当天早些时候称，以色列将在"适当的时间"通过"适当的方式"，在加沙地带北部建立由军方支持的 定居点，作为未来发展更大规模民用定居点的基础，并且以军"永远不会离开整个加沙"。在以色列媒体 看来，卡茨这番话公然违背以总理内塔尼亚胡此前向美国总统特朗普所作承诺，即以色列最终应撤出加 沙地带，并确保"不会占领或吞并加沙"。 卡茨在发表上述言论数小时后，其办公室发表声明澄清，称以色列无意在加沙地带重新建立定居点。声 明说，卡茨是在"谈论安全事务的背景下"发表这番言论，并不涉及政府的定居点政策。 《以色列时报》报道，白宫显然对卡茨这份澄清声明并不 ...

（文章来源：央视新闻） 声明呼吁相关斡旋方要求哈马斯履行其在停火协议和美国总统特朗普提出的"20点计划"中所做的承诺，也就是哈马斯必须立即归还3名以方人员遗体，解除 武装，并使加沙地带彻底非军事化。 稍早前，巴勒斯坦方面消息称，以军再次对加沙地带多个地区发动空袭和炮击。随后，哈马斯发表声明，强烈谴责以色列军队在加沙地带持续违反停火协议 的行为，并呼吁国际斡旋方及美国政府立即采取行动，制止以色列破坏停火进程的企图。 当地时间22日，以色列总理办公室通过社交媒体发表声明称，巴勒斯坦伊斯兰抵抗运动（哈马斯）当天违反停火协议，派遣一名武装人员潜入以色列控制区 袭击以军士兵。作为回应，以色列打死了5名哈马斯高级武装人员。 ...

Core Points - The United States plans to invest approximately $500 million to build a large military base near the Gaza Strip, which will accommodate thousands of soldiers and support international forces operating in Gaza to help maintain the ceasefire [1][3] - This initiative marks a significant shift in the U.S. approach to involvement in the region, indicating a strong commitment to intervene in the Gaza situation and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict [3] - The investment may spark political controversy in the U.S., as many Republican lawmakers oppose expanding military presence abroad amid domestic budget pressures and voter fatigue with foreign interventions [3] Summary by Sections - **Military Base Construction** - The U.S. is moving forward with plans to establish a military base in Israel close to the Gaza border, with a budget of around $500 million [1] - The base is intended to support international forces in their operations in Gaza [1] - **U.S. Involvement and Political Implications** - Recent discussions between U.S. officials and the Israeli government have focused on this proposal, with site assessments already underway [3] - The establishment of the base signifies a major change in U.S. intervention strategy, reflecting a commitment to the region [3] - The potential for domestic political backlash exists, particularly among Republican lawmakers who are wary of increased military commitments abroad [3] - **International Forces and Governance in Gaza** - There are emerging tensions between the U.S. and Israel regarding governance in post-war Gaza, particularly concerning the role of Israel in decision-making processes within the U.S.-led Gaza Civil-Military Cooperation Center [3] - The composition and deployment of international forces in Gaza remain contentious issues [3][4] - The Israeli government is reportedly seeking a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. to grant its military more operational freedom in Gaza [4]

Core Points - The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have resumed the ceasefire agreement after conducting strikes on dozens of targets in response to Hamas's violations of the ceasefire [1][3] - Both parties are accusing each other of violating the ceasefire, with the U.S. stating that the ceasefire remains valid, while UN officials express concerns about its stability [1][8] Summary by Sections Israeli and Hamas Statements - The IDF stated that it has begun to re-implement the ceasefire after targeting "terrorist" sites, asserting that it will respond decisively to any further violations [3] - Hamas condemned the IDF's actions as a blatant violation of the ceasefire, claiming that the attacks are part of a series of Israeli violations [5] Casualties and Violations - Following the IDF's airstrikes, over 100 deaths have been reported in Gaza, with 197 incidents recorded since the ceasefire began, resulting in 194 Palestinian deaths, including approximately 60 children [5][12] - The IDF expressed dissatisfaction with Hamas's progress in returning the remains of Israeli personnel, which has contributed to rising tensions [7][16] International Reactions - The U.S. maintains that the ceasefire is still in effect, while UN officials describe the agreement as fundamentally flawed and precarious [8][12] - U.S. President Trump emphasized Israel's right to retaliate if attacked, while the Vice President acknowledged ongoing small-scale conflicts but affirmed the ceasefire's status [10] Future Negotiations and Conflict Dynamics - Experts suggest that the recent conflicts highlight the fragility of the ceasefire, with both sides preparing for potential future confrontations [14][17] - Israel appears to be testing the international community's tolerance for its military actions, while Hamas seeks to extend the ceasefire to strengthen its military capabilities [21][23]

Group 1 - The Israeli government has resumed military operations in Gaza after a brief ceasefire of 18 days, following an attack by Hamas on Israeli forces [2][5][12] - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu ordered immediate strikes on Gaza, leading to multiple airstrikes in the region, including near Shifa Hospital [4][8] - The Palestinian health department reported at least 9 fatalities due to the renewed Israeli airstrikes on October 28 [8][11] Group 2 - Hamas denied any involvement in the attacks on Israeli forces and emphasized its commitment to the current ceasefire agreement, calling for international pressure on Israel to cease its violations [9][10] - The U.S. Vice President stated that the ceasefire remains effective despite the renewed hostilities, indicating that Israel had notified the U.S. prior to the attacks [10][11] - Reports indicate that Israel has violated the ceasefire agreement over 125 times since its inception, resulting in numerous casualties [14][21] Group 3 - The second phase of the ceasefire agreement has not yet been reached, with ongoing discussions about demilitarization and the deployment of international forces in Gaza [18][20] - There are significant disagreements between Hamas and Israel regarding the composition of the proposed international forces [19][20] - Since the outbreak of the current conflict on October 7, the Palestinian health department has reported over 68,527 deaths and 170,395 injuries in Gaza [21]

Group 1 - The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) conducted a "precision strike" on a refugee camp in Gaza, resulting in one death and multiple injuries, highlighting ongoing tensions despite a ceasefire agreement [1][3] - The ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas has been marked by mutual accusations of violations and attacks since its initial phase began [1][3] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio acknowledged that such incidents are "normal" in the early stages of a ceasefire, indicating ongoing challenges in maintaining the agreement [3] Group 2 - The U.S. government is proposing the formation of an "international force" to monitor the Gaza ceasefire, seeking a United Nations resolution to authorize this initiative [5] - Discussions are ongoing with several countries, including Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey, regarding their potential involvement in the proposed international force [5] - The U.S. is emphasizing cooperation with Israel on key issues such as the return of captured Israeli personnel and the disarmament of Hamas, as part of a broader strategic plan [5][6]

Group 1 - The Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu stated that Israel will determine which troops are unacceptable for deployment to Gaza as part of an "international force" [2] - The U.S. plans to collaborate with Arab nations and international partners to form a temporary international stabilization force in Gaza, which will train and support vetted Palestinian police forces [2] - Netanyahu emphasized that both the U.S. and Israel are sovereign nations, asserting that Israel's security policy is independently controlled and that it will respond to attacks based on its own judgment [2]

Group 1 - The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) conducted a "precision strike" on a refugee camp in Gaza, resulting in one death and multiple injuries, amidst ongoing accusations of ceasefire violations by both Israel and Hamas [1] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio stated that such incidents are "normal" in the early stages of a ceasefire, acknowledging the challenges in maintaining the integrity of the agreement [2] - The U.S. government is proposing the formation of an "international force" to monitor the ceasefire, seeking a United Nations resolution to authorize this initiative, with discussions planned with various countries [2] Group 2 - The frequency of U.S. officials visiting Israel indicates the complexity of the situation regarding ceasefire violations, suggesting a lack of trust in Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu by U.S. officials [3] - The U.S. is actively engaging with countries like Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey regarding the proposed international force, although Israel has rejected Turkey's involvement [2]