The EU isn’t fighting “disinformation” — they’re terrified of dissent.Censor speech today, ban parties tomorrow, import millions who don’t share your values, then jail you for noticing.Keep cheering the Digital Services Act while your freedoms get quietly deleted.This isn’t “protecting democracy.”This is how continents die.Europe will be lost in a generation if the censorship train isn’t derailed — NOW.Wake up or watch your civilization get memory-holed.Elon Musk (@elonmusk):The EU should be abolished and s ...

Hong Kong’s government seems determined to control the political row around the catastrophe—a demonstration of its new intolerance for dissent https://t.co/aJG0tFlQkI ...

Whispers of dissent are growing among the Alawites in Syria. In recent months calls to arms have circulated among some in the sect https://t.co/dO10xFAxxk ...

Outrage over the catastrophe threatens to revive dissent that Beijing has sought to eradicate. https://t.co/MQTMgbRj7o ...

There is major dissent happening inside the Federal Reserve right now.I break down what is happening in my letter to investors this morning.Subscribe here to get it in your inbox: https://t.co/29uk453LoP ...

RT ZNO 🇺🇸 (@therealZNO)“Gatekeeping”“Normalizing”“Platforming”“Promoting”“Hygiene”Like the Wordflation of labels we’ve seen in the past to brand those who disagree with them, this is no different.It’s censorship wrapped in euphemisms so fragile minds can feel righteous while silencing dissent. ...

◦ Inflation 50 + Times | NO◦ Unemployment / Employment 25+ Times | NO◦ Recession | NO◦ Dissent | YES◦ AI / Artificial Intelligence | NO◦ Pandemic | YESEasy (@EasyEatsBodega):For those interesting in my plays in 26minI have now flipped off the NO - on DISSENT sold my shares at 57cSwept the order book at 69c for YES2 people Dissented the decision for a 0.25bps cut.I believe i just managed to scrounge up some free dollars. ...

Core Argument - The document argues that dissent and protest are fundamental to American progress and patriotism, citing historical figures like Thomas Paine, Frederick Douglass, Susan B Anthony, Rosa Parks, and Colin Kaepernick as examples [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14] - The document refutes the notion that protesting against government policies is un-American, asserting that it is a way to hold those in power accountable and strive for a more perfect union [1][15][17][18] Historical Context - The document highlights historical examples of dissent, such as Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" pamphlet, Frederick Douglass's fight against slavery, Susan B Anthony's fight for women's suffrage, and Rosa Parks's refusal to give up her seat on the bus, to illustrate the role of protest in shaping American history [3][4][5][6][7] Modern Protest - The document references Colin Kaepernick's kneeling during the national anthem as a modern example of protest against injustice and police brutality, emphasizing the sacrifices he made to stand up for what he believed in [10][11][12] Rebuttal of Criticism - The document directly addresses and refutes the criticism that protests like the "No Kings" rallies are anti-American, arguing that they are expressions of love for the country and a desire to improve it [1][15][16] Call to Action - The document encourages continued dissent and protest as a means of challenging authority, holding those in power accountable, and creating a better society for all [17][18]

Political Landscape & Potential Impacts - The analysis suggests a strategic use of chaos by the administration, potentially masking controversial actions [1][2] - A presidential memorandum (NPM7) is identified as a potential tool for suppressing political speech and dissent by broadly defining "domestic terrorism" [4][5] - The memo grants the attorney general wide authority to designate groups as domestic terrorist organizations, potentially leading to investigations of protesters, donors, and those affiliated with targeted groups [6] - The administration's focus on Antifa, despite its decentralized nature, raises concerns about the potential for broad targeting of dissent and anti-government sentiment [12][13] - Concerns are raised about the weaponization of the justice system and the politicization of the military, potentially leading to autocratic tendencies [19] Legal & Constitutional Concerns - The analysis highlights the lack of a legal mechanism to formally charge someone as a domestic terrorist, raising concerns about the administration's approach [20] - The memo's language is criticized for potentially criminalizing civil disobedience and dissent, undermining fundamental freedoms of speech and assembly [24] - The memo's provisions are compared to instances of government overreach, such as phone checks of travelers and arrests of students, suggesting a pattern of suppressing opposition [25] - The analysis argues that the administration is attempting to create a narrative of widespread political violence to justify quashing dissent [28] Geopolitical & Social Issues - The administration's deployment of troops to Portland is viewed as a potential precursor to broader actions based on the new memo [8] - The analysis suggests a pattern of targeting cities in blue states, raising concerns about political motivations [15] - The analysis highlights the potential for the administration to target progressive organizations and NGOs, particularly those involved in civil disobedience [23]

More than 2,500 protests have taken place in China in the first six months of this year, a 73% increase over the same period last year, according to one platform. Will the growing dissent build into anything more? https://t.co/r3jdAY6TUO ...