Core Insights - The Ministry of Justice released the "Administrative Review Work White Paper (2024)", highlighting significant trends in administrative disputes and resolutions in China [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Review Statistics - The number of new administrative review cases received by various levels of administrative review agencies reached 749,600 in 2024, a year-on-year increase of 94.7%, which is 2.5 times the number of first-instance administrative cases in courts [2] - The total number of concluded administrative review cases was 641,000, reflecting an 82.1% year-on-year growth [2] - Administrative review cases are predominantly concentrated in economically developed provinces, with 17 provinces receiving over 10,000 cases, accounting for more than 83.2% of the total [2] Group 2: Areas of High Administrative Disputes - The most frequent areas of administrative disputes are market regulation and public security, with the top five categories of cases being: market regulation (163,000 cases, 29.5%), public security (125,000 cases, 22.6%), natural resources (39,000 cases, 7.1%), human resources and social security (27,000 cases, 4.9%), and financial supervision (26,000 cases, 4.7%) [3][4] - In terms of administrative behavior, the most common cases involve complaint handling (161,000 cases, 29.2%), administrative penalties (130,000 cases, 23.5%), government information disclosure (105,000 cases, 19.1%), administrative inaction (48,000 cases, 8.7%), and administrative confirmation (22,000 cases, 4.0%) [3] Group 3: Resolution and Correction Rates - The direct correction rate for administrative reviews was reported at 12.1%, with 58,000 cases corrected through various means such as changes, cancellations, and confirmations of illegality [6] - A total of 168,000 cases were resolved through mediation and reconciliation, achieving a settlement rate of 26.3% [4] - After administrative review, 90.3% of cases did not proceed to litigation or petition processes, with a year-on-year increase of 13.5 percentage points in case resolution rates [4] Group 4: Focus on Enterprise-related Law Enforcement - Administrative review agencies have intensified efforts to supervise unlawful and improper law enforcement actions affecting enterprises, correcting over 6,500 such cases [5] - Specific instances include the correction of wrongful administrative penalties that saved enterprises over 10 million yuan [5] - The white paper emphasizes the importance of maintaining consistency in legal policies to support the construction of a unified market [5]

新华社北京7月1日电（记者 齐琪）记者1日从司法部获悉，2024年全国各级行政复议机关新收行政 复议案件74.96万件，同比增长94.7%，办结行政复议案件64.1万件，同比增长82.1%。经行政复议后， 有90.3%的案件未再进入诉讼或信访程序。 在强化行政复议监督依法行政效能方面，各级行政复议机关坚持有错必纠，充分发挥内部层级监督 优势，通过变更、撤销、确认违法等方式纠正违法或不当行政行为5.8万件，直接纠错率为12.1%。各级 行政复议机关坚持"抓前端、治未病"，针对执法共性问题制发行政复议意见书7114份，附带审查行政规 范性文件1387件，综合运用约谈、通报、决定书抄告等方式，系统规范行政执法行为，从源头上预防和 减少行政争议。 在规范涉企执法监督方面，白皮书提出，过去一年，各级行政复议机关加大行政复议监督违法和不 当涉企执法行为工作力度，纠正侵害企业合法权益违法和不当执法行为6500余件。同时，通过制发行政 复议意见书、建议书，推动解决涉企执法共性问题。邀请工商联、商会等共同参与行政复议案件调解， 通过调解、和解实质化解1.9万件，切实为企业纾困解难。 司法部发布的《行政复议工作白皮书（2024） ...

Astris Advisory Japan KK策略师指出，在过去五年中，每年7月日元均录得涨幅；过去六个月，由于全 球贸易摩擦以及特朗普呼吁美联储降息等因素导致美元承压，日元升值了9%。自2020年以来，日元每 年7月都上涨，平均兑美元上涨2.8%，成为同期表现最强劲的月份。日本央行的政策变化、8月暑假前 的仓位调整以及出口商将海外收入兑换成日元用于支付股息等多种因素共同推升日元。日元强势的主要 原因可能是美元的全面滑坡。在流动性下降且很多基金经理休假的情况下，减少风险敞口是合理的做 法。没有理由认为今年7月会有所不同，市场可能继续看到日元的强势表现。 高盛：将美联储下次降息预测提前至9月 凯投宏观：贸易紧张局势是亚洲经济体的主要风险 Lombard Odier：预计美元未来12个月持续走软 高盛分析师表示，将美联储下次降息的时间预测从12月提前到9月，反映出对当前经济状况和未来通胀 趋势的新评估。初步证据显示，关税对美国通胀的影响似乎比之前预计的小，而其他导致通胀下降的因 素则更为显著；美联储官员可能也持有相似观点，即关税对物价水平的影响是一次性的。美国人找工作 变得越来越困难，季节性因素以及移民政策的变 ...

Group 1 - The new Mineral Resources Law will be implemented starting July 1, 2025, emphasizing support for strategic mineral resources exploration, extraction, trade, and reserves to enhance capacity and optimize the industry [1] - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the National Energy Administration have announced reforms to improve the "getting electricity" service level, effective from July 1 [2][3] - The NDRC has issued a notice to reduce the baseline service fees for credit report inquiries by commercial banks and other institutions, expected to save users approximately 1.1 billion annually starting July 1 [4] Group 2 - The "Tax Payment Credit Management Measures" will take effect on July 1, enhancing the standards for correcting minor credit violations and establishing a gradual repair mechanism for unpaid taxes [5][6] - The new "Management Measures for Information Disclosure of Listed Companies" will be implemented on July 1, requiring companies to disclose significant risk factors that may adversely affect their core competitiveness and future development [7] Group 3 - A notification regarding the application of drug traceability codes in medical insurance and work injury insurance will be effective from July 1, requiring sales to scan codes for insurance fund settlements [8][9] - The "Labor Ability Appraisal Management Measures" will be implemented on July 1, focusing on convenience for applicants and reducing redundant submission of materials [10][11] Group 4 - The announcement to regulate new psychoactive substances, including nicotine-like substances, will take effect on July 1, aiming to prevent abuse and combat related criminal activities [12] - The Ministry of Finance has announced that Dalian and Hubei will implement a tax refund policy for overseas travelers starting July 1 [14][15] Group 5 - The new regulations for military recruitment in Tianjin will take effect on July 1, ensuring that new recruits enjoy benefits from the date of approval for enlistment [17][18] - The "Shanxi Province Rural Revitalization Promotion Regulations" will be effective from July 1, encouraging cooperation between farmers and agricultural enterprises to share value-added benefits [19][20] Group 6 - The "Zhejiang Province Urban Community Renewal Regulations" will be implemented on July 1, focusing on the orderly layout of public spaces and promoting minor renovations [22][23] - The "Hubei Province Heroes and Martyrs Protection Regulations" will take effect on July 1, protecting the environment and atmosphere of memorial sites [24][25] Group 7 - New regulations in Guangdong prohibit the forced purchase of school uniforms for students, effective from July 1 [26][27] - The "Hainan Province Measures for Strictly Regulating Administrative Inspections of Enterprises" will be implemented on July 1, aiming to reduce excessive inspections [28][29] Group 8 - The "Chongqing Parking Management Regulations" will take effect on July 1, mandating a minimum of 15 minutes of free parking time in government-regulated parking lots [30][31]

Core Points - The National Internet Information Office has issued the "Administrative Penalty Discretionary Power Benchmark Application Regulations," effective from August 1, 2025, aimed at standardizing administrative penalties and protecting the legal rights of citizens and organizations [1][12] - The regulations detail the criteria for administrative penalties, categorizing them into no penalty, reduced penalty, light penalty, general penalty, and heavy penalty, based on the nature and severity of the violation [1][3][5] Group 1 - The regulations are designed to ensure uniformity, fairness, and proportionality in administrative penalties, combining punishment with education [1][3] - Local internet information departments are allowed to develop their own discretionary benchmarks based on regional circumstances, with oversight from higher-level departments [2][10] - Specific circumstances for each category of penalty are outlined, including conditions under which no penalty or reduced penalties may be applied [5][6][8] Group 2 - The regulations emphasize the importance of considering various factors when determining the nature and severity of violations, including the method of violation, duration, and social impact [9][10] - The regulations stipulate that penalties must not exceed certain limits, with specific percentages defined for light, general, and heavy penalties [7][10] - The regulations will be implemented starting August 1, 2025, marking a significant change in the enforcement of internet-related administrative penalties [12]

Core Points - The National Internet Information Office has released the "Regulations on the Application of Discretionary Power in Administrative Penalties by Cyber Information Departments," effective from August 1, 2025 [1] - The regulations define the discretionary power in administrative penalties as a detailed and quantified enforcement standard based on various factors such as the nature of the violation, social harm, and the subjective fault of the parties involved [1] - The regulations emphasize principles such as legal uniformity, fairness, proportionality of punishment, and a combination of punishment and education in the application of discretionary power [1] Summary by Categories Administrative Penalty Discretion - The discretionary power is categorized into no penalty, reduced penalty, lighter penalty, general penalty, and heavier penalty, with specific applicable circumstances outlined for each category [1] - If a violation does not meet the criteria for no penalty, reduced penalty, lighter penalty, or heavier penalty, a general penalty should be imposed [1] Local Implementation - Local cyber information departments at various administrative levels are allowed to formulate their own discretionary power standards based on local conditions [1] - Higher-level cyber information departments are responsible for supervising the exercise of discretionary power by lower-level departments through inspections and evaluations of administrative enforcement cases [1]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Administrative Law Enforcement Coordination and Supervision Bureau in Linyi City aims to enhance the coordination and supervision of administrative law enforcement, ensuring it is more strict, standardized, fair, and civilized [1][3]. Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement System - Linyi City has focused on improving the quality of administrative law enforcement and standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement, completing a pilot for a four-level administrative law enforcement coordination and supervision system [2]. - The city has established "Administrative Law Enforcement Coordination and Supervision Offices" in all 156 town (street) judicial offices, detailing 99 responsibilities across city, county, and township levels [2]. - A new regulatory framework has been introduced, including the "Linyi City Enterprise Classification and Regulation Method (Trial)," which aims to create a classification standard system for enterprise regulation based on industry characteristics [2]. Group 2: Supervision and Inspection Mechanisms - Five major systems have been established to manage enterprise-related administrative inspections, ensuring that checks are only conducted according to set standards and plans [2]. - The government and discipline inspection commission have created a "dual special team" mechanism to address prominent issues in administrative law enforcement, resulting in the rectification of over 1,800 problems over four years [2]. - The "Joint Inspection Platform for Enterprises" has been developed, leading to a 35% year-on-year decrease in average monthly enterprise inspections in 2024 [2]. Group 3: Future Directions - The Linyi City Judicial Bureau plans to leverage the establishment of the new bureau to enhance its responsibilities and continue promoting strict, standardized, fair, and civilized law enforcement, providing strong legal support for high-quality economic and social development in the city [3].

开车出行也是个不错的选择 很多车友比较关注 高速公路免费通行的相关政策 小编今天为大家整理了 豫A/V/B/C/R车主 现在有车一族越来越多啦 最新高速免费政策 各位老司机们快快转发收藏啦~ 01 郑州市主城区与航空港区高速免费通行政策 免费站点 郑州市主城区与航空港 和早先免费路段相比，新增了机场、京港澳、郑民、商登、安罗5条高速公路87公里，新增了7个收费站（郑庵站、机场站北口、机场站南口、姚家站、岗 李站、韩寺站，机场东站），未来免费路段上新增的收费站，同样享受此政策。 图源：河南高速（下同） 区高速免费通 免费路段 郑州绕城高速公路（京港澳段、连霍段、西南绕城段组成）； 京港澳高速段（京港澳与西南绕城互通至新郑收费站段）； 机场高速段（郑州南收费站至机场高速与西南绕城互通段）； 郑栾高速段（郑州侯寨收费站至新郑西收费站段）； 郑少高速段（郑州西南收费站至少林收费站段）； 商登高速段（商登高速园博园收费站至商登郑少洛互通段）。 免费对象 安装有ETC套装的豫A、豫V牌照小型客车(9座及以下)。 郑开兰高速免费通行政策 行政策 免费站点 花园路站、柳林站、东三环北站、中牟站、开封西站、开封站、龙亭站、开封 ...

《治安管理处罚法》的上述修订，是对当前未成年人违法新形势和新情况的积极应对。过去的治安管理 处罚法规定的"拘留不执行"，体现了立法在感化、挽救未成年人方面的极大善意，在相当长的时期内发 挥了积极作用，这一点应该被承认和肯定。但是，随着社会情况的变化，尤其是数字时代的到来，未成 年人的生活环境发生了根本性改变，法律的目标和期待在实践中可能得不到实现，法律的善意也可能会 被利用，有的未成年人之所以多次违法屡教不改，就是巧妙地利用了这一规定，知道对自己的拘留只会 停留在纸面和文本中，不会真正实施。于是，法律的规定在实施中引发了道德难题或者伦理悖论，法律 的善意放任甚至助长了违法行为，背离了公众朴素的常识和正义感，引发了强烈的批评和非议。 在上述背景下，《治安管理处罚法》在未成年人拘留问题上进行了制度优化和完善，将过去简单的基于 年龄的"一放了之"，调整为根据实际情况的"个案处理"。对于初犯和不严重的违法行为，依然坚持"只 处罚不执行"的态度，但对行为性质恶劣、后果严重以及屡次再犯的不法少年，则通过实际执行拘留， 让违法少年为自己的错误付出代价，通过让其感受失去自由的痛苦，督促其改正错误，实现法律"治病 救人"的根本 ...

Core Viewpoint - Jiangyin Customs has imposed an administrative penalty of 18,000 RMB on Jiangsu Zhenjiang New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. for multiple instances of false declarations in import and export activities [1][5]. Group 1: False Declaration of Import Prices - Between March 2022 and March 2024, the company submitted false import price declarations, affecting national tax revenue. Specifically, from July 2022 to September 2023, the company entrusted multiple customs declaration companies to declare 79 shipments, resulting in underreported freight costs and a tax shortfall of 17,116.50 RMB due to unreported insurance fees totaling 76,201.04 RMB [3][4]. Group 2: Incorrect Tax Code Declaration - In October 2023, while handling the remaining materials from processing trade manuals, the company incorrectly declared six types of welded cast steel parts under the wrong tax code, impacting customs statistical accuracy. Although this did not affect tax collection, it involved a total value of 9,826,649.79 RMB [3][4]. Group 3: Misreporting of Processing Trade Consumption - From August 2021 to December 2023, the company failed to accurately report the actual consumption of 78 types of bonded materials due to internal miscommunication and management issues. This misreporting involved 2,544 items with a total value of 138,841.97 RMB, leading to a corresponding tax amount of 24,912.59 RMB [4][5]. Group 4: Penalty Details - The penalties imposed by Jiangyin Customs include: 3,500 RMB for false price declarations affecting tax revenue, 1,500 RMB for incorrect tax code declarations affecting statistical accuracy, and 13,000 RMB for failing to report processing trade consumption accurately, totaling 18,000 RMB [5][6]. Group 5: Company Background - Jiangsu Zhenjiang New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. was established in March 2004 with a registered capital of 94.22 million RMB. The company specializes in the design, research and development, production, and sales of port machinery, wind power generation components, electrolytic aluminum machinery, and engineering machinery steel structures. It was listed on the A-share market in 2017 under stock code 603507 [6].