People are worried that we won't keep saying what we want to say or that we'll be censored. But I'm going to cover the president's trip to the UK just like I normally would. Here we go.Well, guys, President Trump just wrapped up his three-day trip to the UK, and he looked incredibly handsome. As always, his tie was exactly the right length and his face looked like a color that exists in nature. While back here at home, his administration is pursuing a crackdown on free speech.And completely unrelated, I jus ...

And now joining us for more on it is House Minority Whip, Congresswoman Katherryn Clark of Massachusetts. Congresswoman, thank you for taking the time. Let's start with the funding fight. The House voting this morning on that short-term plan to keep the government running. Democrats are against that plan as Michael just laid out, but what's your leverage? Listen, Anna, it is good to be with you and we are minutes away from this vote being called and this is going to be a close vote, but it is not a close ca ...

🤔TaraBull (@TaraBull808):Remember when they called for the President of the United States to lose his free speech? https://t.co/DyWhmWiPZ6 ...

Is free speech under threat. Is the First Amendment under threat. Absolutely.I think since the beginning of this second Trump administration, the president and his advisers have taken a number of steps to use sort of every lever of power at their disposal to control the speech of private individuals, private companies and private institutions. And I think the Brennan Carr's statements on Wednesday is just the latest example of this administration using threats of regulatory oversight, denial of mergers and ...

Core Argument - The article discusses the perceived threats to free speech and the First Amendment under the current administration, highlighting actions taken to control speech by private individuals and companies [2][4][26]. Government Actions - The Trump administration has allegedly used regulatory threats and coercion to influence private companies, compelling them to censor speech that the administration finds objectionable [2][11][24]. - The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman's statements are cited as a direct threat to broadcasters, suggesting that failure to comply with government expectations could lead to regulatory scrutiny [10][11]. Case Examples - The suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show by Disney is presented as a case where backlash from the administration influenced corporate decisions, raising concerns about the implications for free speech [6][7][10]. - A historical case involving the National Rifle Association (NRA) is referenced, where the Supreme Court ruled that government pressure on private entities to suppress speech violates the First Amendment [18][19]. Legal Implications - There is potential for legal recourse through lawsuits challenging government actions that infringe upon free speech rights, with the possibility of cases reaching the Supreme Court [4][19][26]. - The complexities of such legal actions are acknowledged, particularly regarding the remedies sought and the financial motivations of involved parties [21][26]. Broader Implications - The article raises concerns about the chilling effect on media and public discourse, suggesting that the current environment could deter criticism of the government and undermine the principles of free speech [24][25][26]. - The potential for future administrations to use similar tactics against opposing media is highlighted, emphasizing the risks to free speech across the political spectrum [24][26].

President Donald Trump suggested that US broadcast networks should face scrutiny over their licenses if their content is overwhelmingly critical of him, and defended ABC’s decision to suspend late-night host Jimmy Kimmel’s show indefinitely over remarks about the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.“That’s something that should be talked about for licensing, too. When you have a network and you have evening shows, and all they do is hit Trump,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. “They’re lic ...

It is day 242 of the second Trump administration. Tonight, Donald Trump is back in Washington after a state visit to the UK and he returns home to a new firestorm of controversy after ABC pulled late night host Jimmy Kimmel off the air indefinitely. ABC made that decision following criticism from FCC chairman Brendan Carr as well as NextStar, who is a company that operates 28 ABC affiliate stations.And it was all about comments that Kimmel made concerning the suspect in Charlie Kirk's shooting. At least tha ...

Political Strategy & Accountability - The Democratic party is employing oversight and judiciary committees to hold the administration accountable [1][2] - A coordinated approach is being used to issue subpoenas and investigate potential wrongdoings [3][20] - The aim is to expose and hold accountable those carrying out potentially illegal orders, even if higher-ups evade prosecution [16][17] Cancel Culture & Free Speech - The Republican party is accused of engaging in cancel culture by targeting universities, comedians, and private businesses [4] - Concerns are raised about government overreach and the suppression of dissenting voices [10][11] - The FCC is allegedly using its regulatory power to intimidate media companies and stifle free speech [14][15] Political Polarization & Mobilization - The current political climate is compared to historical periods of fear and repression, such as the Palmer Raids and the McCarthy era [10] - There's a call to mobilize the American people to defend the fundamental right to free speech and equality [11] - Democrats are urged to project confidence and leadership in defending democracy and freedoms [21][22]

Tonight, protests outside Disney headquarters as fallout grows from the company's abrupt decision to indefinitely pull Jimmy Kimmel's late night show off the air. Condemnation swift from Democrats in Washington to Hollywood heavyweights. You can't go around firing somebody because you're fearful or trying to suck up to an authoritarian criminal uh administration in the Oval Office.That's just not how this works. But President Trump and many of his supporters praising the decision by ABC and its parent compa ...

Anyone anyone with the profound privilege of sitting in a chair like this one felt something shift over the last 16 hours. Because this afternoon it is abundantly clear to everyone, not just people who sit in chairs like this one, but every single American that the First Amendment in the hands of this current administration isn't what it used to be. It does not protect an individual's right to speak freely.That right endowed by the founders, enshrined in the constitution, fought for, bled for over the cours ...