今年2月莫迪去美国谈贸易翻倍，特朗普还答应卖F-35战机给印度，这种装备连美国盟友都未必能轻易拿到。印度是金砖国家成员，但这次行为明 显跟中国提议的"共同对抗美国霸凌"对着干。中国外长在巴西开会时还强调要维护多边贸易，结果印度直接单干。之前金砖要扩员，印度就怕自 己话语权被稀释，偷偷反对拖慢进度，现在又跟美国跑这么快。印度人自己好像也闹矛盾。印度去年军费全球前三，买的都是美国和法国装备。 美国副总统万斯前段时间，访问印度希望能尽快达成关税协议。 据环球网报道，金砖国家外长会晤近日在巴西里约热内卢结束。巴西外长维埃拉在会后举行的记者会上说，与会外长们就反对全球"关税战"达成 共识，坚决反对贸易保护主义维埃拉说："我们坚决反对贸易保护主义死灰复燃以及以环境为借口采取的一些非关税措施。我们认为世界贸易组织 改革对解决贸易争端至关重要。"会晤发表主席声明说，外长们严重关切违反世贸组织规则的、不公正的单边保护主义行径，包括滥施对等关税。 莫迪与普京（资料图） 巴西作为轮值主席国发布声明，未直接点名美国。但在座的基本都是这次特朗普关税战的见证者，到底说谁，大家也一清二楚。然而，俄罗斯当 年的短视，为了阻碍中国掌控金砖组织 ...

其中提到，中国始终按照相互尊重、和平共处、合作共赢的原则处理中美关系，致力于中美关系稳定、 健康、可持续发展。中国不惹事也不怕事，谈，我们大门敞开，打，中国也将奉陪到底，施压和威胁绝 不是同中国打交道的正确方式。维护发展权利是中国国家安全的红线之一，维护国家利益也是中国国家 安全的基本要求。正如白皮书指出的，中国不觊觎他国权益，不嫉妒他国发展，但决不放弃自身正当权 益，在原则问题上寸步不让。中国有决心有信心有能力应对美国关税冲击，致力于维护多边贸易体制， 维护国际公平正义。中国国家安全将变压力为动力，把应对美国冲击视为加快构建新安全格局、推进国 家安全体系和能力现代化的战略机遇。 ...

责编：罗晓霞 校对：高源 百万用户都在看 巴基斯坦， 重大突发！ 刚刚！普京，重大宣布！ 华尔街大举出手，什么信号？ 集体大涨！两大利好，重磅来袭！ 美国六大州，突然出手！贝森特发声，涉及对华关税 何立峰在会见世界贸易组织总干事伊维拉时指出：中方坚定支持多边主义和自由贸易，支持世界贸易组织在全 球经济治理中发挥更大作用 当地时间5月11日晚，国务院副总理何立峰在日内瓦会见世界贸易组织总干事伊维拉。 何立峰表示，以世界贸易组织为核心的多边贸易体制是国际贸易的基石，在全球经济治理中发挥着重要作用。 各方应在世界贸易组织框架下通过平等对话解决分歧和争端，共同维护多边主义和自由贸易，促进全球产业链 供应链稳定畅通。中国将继续全面深入参与世界贸易组织改革，支持世界贸易组织发挥全球贸易"稳定器"作 用，维护发展中成员正当权益，为应对全球共同挑战作出更大贡献。何立峰还应询介绍了中美经贸高层会谈有 关情况。 伊维拉表示，当前全球经济和贸易增长面临严峻挑战，世界贸易组织成员应共同捍卫开放和以规则为基础的多 边贸易体制，加强在国际贸易问题上的对话和合作，推动世界贸易组织在促进贸易自由化便利化和实现全球可 持续发展上发挥更大作用。 ...

何立峰：中方坚定支持多边主义和自由贸易 支持世界贸易组织在全球经济治理中发挥更大作用 伊维拉表示，当前全球经济和贸易增长面临严峻挑战，世界贸易组织成员应共同捍卫开放和以规则为 基础的多边贸易体制，加强在国际贸易问题上的对话和合作，推动世界贸易组织在促进贸易自由化便 利化和实现全球可持续发展上发挥更大作用。 据新华社，当地时间5月11日晚，国务院副总理何立峰在日内瓦会见世界贸易组织总干事伊维拉。 何立峰表示，以世界贸易组织为核心的多边贸易体制是国际贸易的基石，在全球经济治理中发挥着重 要作用。各方应在世界贸易组织框架下通过平等对话解决分歧和争端，共同维护多边主义和自由贸 易，促进全球产业链供应链稳定畅通。中国将继续全面深入参与世界贸易组织改革，支持世界贸易组 织发挥全球贸易"稳定器"作用，维护发展中成员正当权益，为应对全球共同挑战作出更大贡献。何立 峰还应询介绍了中美经贸高层会谈有关情况。 ...

Group 1 - The European perception of the United States has shifted due to aggressive actions taken by the new U.S. government, leading to a reevaluation of strategic dependencies and a push for greater autonomy in Europe [1][2] - The European Commission has imposed fines of €500 million on Apple and €200 million on Meta for violations of the Digital Markets Act, which has escalated tensions between the EU and U.S. [1][2] - A recent poll indicates that 41% of British citizens believe the U.S. is doing bad things in the world, a significant increase of 16 percentage points from the previous year, reflecting a growing anti-American sentiment in Europe [2] Group 2 - The roots of the transatlantic rift stem from diverging values and institutional principles, as highlighted by U.S. Vice President's critical remarks about European democracy and media freedom during the Munich Security Conference [2] - Concerns over security have intensified in Europe, particularly due to the U.S. negotiating with Russia over the Ukraine crisis without European involvement, raising fears about NATO's commitment to European security [2][3] - The trust in economic relations between Europe and the U.S. has eroded, with calls for the EU to rebuild international trade frameworks and reduce reliance on U.S. markets [3] Group 3 - Europe is increasingly viewed as needing to strengthen its strategic autonomy, with experts suggesting that the U.S. role in global trade may be overestimated [3] - The EU is focusing on markets outside the U.S., emphasizing the potential for "de-Americanization" rather than "de-globalization" if the U.S. continues to adopt a confrontational stance [3] - In the information technology sector, Europe is taking steps to reduce dependence on U.S. technology, including the establishment of sovereign cloud services and measures to protect officials from U.S. surveillance [4] Group 4 - Europe is committed to maintaining a multilateral trade system, opposing U.S. protectionism, and supporting the principles of the World Trade Organization (WTO) [4][5] - Cooperation with China is becoming a significant aspect of Europe's strategic adjustments, with calls for deeper ties as a natural choice given the substantial bilateral trade volume of over €800 billion [5] - The shift in European policy towards China is seen as a strong indication of its commitment to strategic autonomy, diverging from U.S. approaches [5]

Group 1: US-China Economic Talks - The high-level economic talks between China and the US held in Geneva resulted in substantial progress and important consensus [4] - Both sides agreed to establish a US-China economic consultation mechanism and clarify the leaders responsible for further discussions on economic issues [4] Group 2: Automotive Industry - In April, the retail sales of passenger cars in China reached 1.755 million units, marking a year-on-year growth of 14.5%, the highest growth rate for April in nearly a decade [6] - The cumulative retail volume for the first four months of the year was 6.872 million units, with a year-on-year increase of 7.9% [6] Group 3: Real Estate Market - The "single price land king" project in Shanghai's Xuhui Riverside achieved a sales amount of 6.988 billion yuan, with all 120 units sold out on the first day of opening [14] - The average price of the project was approximately 19.5 million yuan per square meter, reflecting strong demand in the luxury housing market [14] Group 4: Company Responses to Market Events - Huyuan Juice issued a statement denying negative rumors about the company, emphasizing its commitment to protecting its brand reputation [12] - Chengfei Integration announced that there had been no significant changes in its operational situation or external environment, addressing stock price fluctuations [15]

Group 1 - The multilateral trade deficit reflects the gap between domestic savings and domestic investment, and tax cuts for billionaires will exacerbate this deficit by reducing national savings [1][2] - The Trump administration's policies, including tax cuts and withdrawal from international tax agreements, are seen as a strategy to undermine established systems that have been in place for 250 years [1][3] - Empirical studies show that tax cuts for the wealthy do not significantly impact economic growth or unemployment rates but increase income inequality [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. has become a service-oriented economy, with key exports being tourism, education, and healthcare, which have been systematically weakened under Trump's policies [2][3] - The fear of stagflation has impacted stock and bond markets, with potential tax revenue decreasing by over 10% due to weakened enforcement and compliance [3][4] - The U.S. government's withdrawal from international tax cooperation and enforcement of anti-corruption laws indicates a deliberate pattern of dismantling frameworks aimed at combating tax evasion and money laundering [3][4] Group 3 - The rise of unregulated cryptocurrency markets under the Trump administration has contributed to the growth of the global illegal economy, with significant regulatory rollbacks [4][5] - The issuance of controversial stablecoins and the promotion of cryptocurrency by Trump and his associates reflect a broader attack on laws that threaten wealth accumulation [5][6] - Global cooperation has proven effective in addressing tax issues, as seen with the introduction of a global minimum tax rate by over 50 countries [5][6]

中国外交部5月11日举行中外媒体吹风会。在回答美国滥施关税相关问题时，外交部部长助理苗得雨表 示，美国把关税作为实施极限施压、谋取私利的武器，这是典型的单边主义、保护主义和经济霸凌行 径，是以牺牲世界各国的正当利益，服务美国的霸权私利。 中方始终坚决反对美方滥施所谓"对等关税"，采取了有力法律措施开展坚决斗争。中方将坚决维护自身 发展利益，捍卫国际公平正义，维护国际经贸秩序。我们愿同拉美国家加强沟通和协调，共同努力维护 多边主义，维护多边贸易体制。（央视新闻） ...

Core Viewpoint - The cultivation of global vision and economic insight among university students is increasingly important in the context of current international economic conditions, particularly trade wars [1][2][3] Group 1: Trade War and Economic Globalization - The trade war initiated by the U.S. aims to disrupt the existing international economic order and serves U.S. hegemonic interests, violating multilateral trade systems and World Trade Organization rules [3][4][5] - The U.S. government's imposition of tariffs is seen as a unilateral protectionist measure that undermines global economic stability and impacts supply chains [5][6][12] - The trade war is a reflection of the U.S.'s internal economic challenges and its attempt to shift some economic burdens onto other countries [9][13] Group 2: Educational Approach in Ideological and Political Courses - Ideological and political courses should clarify the basic facts of the trade war and engage students in analyzing its causes and long-term implications [4][8] - The integration of economic topics into ideological education is essential for helping students understand global dynamics and trends [6][7] - Teaching should include real-life examples and case studies to illustrate the impact of globalization and trade wars on local businesses and the economy [7][10] Group 3: Youth Engagement and Responsibility - It is crucial to instill a sense of mission and responsibility in youth, encouraging them to contribute to technological innovation and economic transformation in the face of trade challenges [9][14] - Students should be guided to connect their personal aspirations with national needs, particularly in the context of economic development and global cooperation [12][14] - The importance of critical thinking and independent analysis is emphasized to help students navigate complex international issues and avoid misinformation [8][11]

Core Points - The dialogue in Geneva highlighted the negative impact of U.S. tariffs on developing countries, emphasizing the need for solidarity and cooperation among these nations to address trade barriers imposed by the U.S. [1] - The WTO Secretary-General noted that current trade frictions could lead to a long-term decline in global GDP by nearly 7%, with particularly severe effects on developing and least developed countries [2] - Economic experts criticized the U.S. tariff policy as detrimental, arguing that it reflects a zero-sum mentality and could exacerbate economic uncertainty rather than resolve manufacturing challenges [3] Group 1 - The dialogue emphasized that U.S. tariffs undermine sustainable development agendas and violate the principles of a rules-based multilateral trading system [1] - Representatives from various countries called for global cooperation and dialogue as the only viable solution to address global challenges [1] - The meeting's extension indicated the urgency and importance of the discussions surrounding U.S. trade practices [1] Group 2 - The WTO's report stressed that if all economies pursue benefits at the expense of others, the outcome will be detrimental to all parties involved, highlighting the necessity of cooperative trade policies [2] - Chinese officials urged the U.S. to show sincerity in negotiations by preparing to correct its unilateral tariff actions [2] - Investors expressed relief regarding the high-level talks between the U.S. and China, as trade between the two major economies has nearly stagnated, raising concerns about potential shortages in the U.S. [2] Group 3 - Experts in Switzerland argued that the U.S. approach to tariffs is economically illogical and could disrupt resource allocation, leading to increased unemployment and rising prices [3] - The significance of the U.S.-China talks was underscored as a means to ease global trade tensions, which is a positive development for the world [3] - The Swiss perspective reflects a broader concern about the crisis facing the global multilateral trading system due to U.S. tariff actions [3]