美国总统特朗普：我通过威胁切断贸易，成功促使印度和巴基斯坦停止了冲突。 ...

报道称，诺实际上一直在国防部履行负责印太安全事务的助理国防部长的职责，曾两次陪同国防部长皮 特·赫格塞思出访亚洲。赫格塞思3月宣布对密克罗尼西亚联邦一些地区投资20亿美元，以加强基础设施 建设，就有诺从旁协助。他2024年10月曾率领美国国会代表团前往密克罗尼西亚联邦访问，讨论"第二 岛链"问题。 【文/观察者网 王一】本周早些时候，美国国防部提名曾在众议院"中国问题特别委员会"担任法律顾 问、炒作过"中国威胁论"的美籍韩裔官员约翰·诺（John Noh）担任负责印太安全事务的助理国防部长。 韩国《朝鲜日报》6月4日指出，该职务是五角大楼在亚洲地区的关键职位，负责监督美国在东亚、东南 亚的军事战略和联盟。在美国与中国关系紧张、盟友们正寻求美国明确其在该地区的长期立场的当下， 极具挑战性。 根据美国国防部网站披露的信息，诺毕业于斯坦福大学和布朗大学法学院，曾是一名美国驻阿富汗的陆 军军官。后来，他开始从事法律工作，在得克萨斯州出任助理检察官，负责贩毒案件。 在"中国问题特别委员会"期间，诺主要负责美国及其盟友在印太地区的战略，并在该地区开展以国防为 重心的合作。后来在特朗普宣誓就职当天，诺开始担任国防部负责东亚 ...

Group 1: Technology and Innovation - The core battlefield of the US-China rivalry is in the technology sector, particularly in areas like artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and 5G [2] - Despite US sanctions, China has made significant strides in technology self-sufficiency, exemplified by Huawei's development of the Kirin 9000s chip and the launch of the DeepSeek R1 AI model, which outperformed some US models [4][5] - China's commitment to increasing R&D investment in core technologies like semiconductors and AI is expected to enhance its competitiveness [5] Group 2: Trade Relations - The trade war initiated by the Trump administration in 2018 has not subsided, with tariffs imposed on hundreds of billions of dollars of Chinese goods [7] - China has responded to US tariffs by imposing its own tariffs on US agricultural and industrial products, showcasing its economic resilience [9] - The potential for negotiation and compromise remains, as evidenced by the temporary suspension of certain tariffs during Geneva talks [9] Group 3: Global Supply Chain and Manufacturing - The US has attempted to exclude China from global supply chains, but China's position as the "world's factory" remains strong due to its superior infrastructure and production efficiency [11][12] - In the electric vehicle sector, BYD is projected to surpass Tesla as the largest EV manufacturer by 2024, indicating China's growing influence in this market [13] Group 4: Military Dynamics - China's military modernization, including advancements in missile technology and aircraft, demonstrates its growing military capabilities [15] - The US continues to conduct military operations in the South China Sea, but both nations have shown restraint in escalating military tensions [17] Group 5: Overall Economic Outlook - The US faces challenges such as manufacturing hollowing out and rising social tensions, while China is steadily advancing its economic reforms and expanding its international relationships [19] - The strategic patience and resilience of China may lead to a potential shift in the balance of power, allowing it to break the US's dominant position in the future [19]

加拿大工会敦促国家抵御特朗普不断升级的关税威胁 金十数据6月4日讯，加拿大最大的公共部门工会呼吁联邦政府抵制特朗普总统对加拿大钢铝加征关税， 并引入投资保护措施。全国统一工会主席拉娜·佩恩说，"这些关税正在扼杀我们的钢铁、铝和汽车行业 的投资，我们已经看到了失业和经济不稳定的后果。"该工会希望对美国钢铝征收与50%的关税相匹配 的报复性关税，并希望采取新的边境措施，防止外国钢铁和铝在加拿大倾销。此外，该机构还希望暂时 停止向美国出口战略金属，并建立储备。 ...

编者按：5月31日，美国防长赫格塞思在香格里拉对话会上发表演讲，大肆渲染中国威胁， 就涉台、南海等问题发表消极言论。对此，我国外交部表示：赫格塞思无视地区国家求和平 谋发展的呼声，兜售阵营对抗的冷战思维，抹黑攻击中国，大肆渲染"中国威胁论"，充满挑 衅挑拨。中方对此强烈不满和坚决反对，已向美方提出严正交涉。 如何评判美国防长此番挑衅性言论？观察者网就此连线了国际问题学者、全球化智库 （CCG）副主任高志凯。 【对话/观察者网 唐晓甫】 观察者网：5月31日，新加坡香格里拉对话会上，美国国防部长赫格塞思首次登台发言。他在演讲中竭 力渲染"中国威胁论"，并称如果中国大陆试图"征服"台湾地区，将会带来"毁灭性后果"。你对此有何解 读？ 高志凯：赫格塞思在香格里拉对话会上关于台湾海峡两岸所发表的言论具有破坏意义，毫无建设性，但 我们一定要仔细琢磨他这番说法的真正用意。 我最近说过，赫格塞思在香格里拉对话会上所说的任何一句话也无法改变现实：世界上只有一个中国， 台湾是中国的一部分，中华人民共和国政府代表海峡两岸全体中国人民。无论他说什么、如何上蹿下 跳，或者编造各种各样的谎言，都改变不了这一法理事实和中国统一的大趋势。 ...

Core Points - The 22nd Shangri-La Dialogue was held in Singapore from May 30 to June 1, with a notable change in China's representation, sending a delegation from the National Defense University instead of a higher-level official [1][7] - U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's speech emphasized the "China threat," particularly regarding Taiwan and the South China Sea, which was met with strong rebuttals from the Chinese delegation [1][5] - The dialogue highlighted the contrasting perspectives on regional security, with U.S. officials advocating for increased defense spending among regional allies, while many attendees expressed skepticism about U.S. intentions and commitments [4][10] Group 1: U.S. Position - U.S. Defense Secretary Austin's remarks were characterized by a hegemonic mindset, aiming to provoke confrontation and promote U.S. interests in the Asia-Pacific region [3][4] - The U.S. is perceived to be pressuring regional allies to increase defense spending, effectively pushing them to purchase American military equipment [4][10] - Many attendees at the dialogue expressed disappointment with Austin's speech, viewing it as lacking substance and primarily focused on maintaining U.S. dominance without offering concrete security guarantees [10] Group 2: China's Response - The Chinese delegation, led by Major General Hu Gangfeng, firmly rejected the accusations made by the U.S., labeling them as unfounded and aimed at inciting conflict in the Asia-Pacific [1][5] - China's participation at a lower level this year was framed as a strategic choice, emphasizing constructive dialogue and mutual respect rather than a sign of diminished importance [7][8] - The Chinese response highlighted a commitment to peace and stability in the region, contrasting sharply with the confrontational tone of the U.S. [5][10]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Defense responds to negative remarks made by the U.S. Secretary of Defense regarding China, emphasizing that the Taiwan issue is an internal matter for China and asserting that the U.S. will ultimately harm itself with its actions [1] Group 1: Defense and Sovereignty - The Chinese military is committed to defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and will resolutely counter any attempts at "Taiwan independence" and external interference [1] - The Chinese government asserts that its determination and capabilities to protect its interests are strong and reliable [1] Group 2: Regional Stability - The South China Sea is described as one of the busiest and safest international shipping routes, with China advocating for dialogue and cooperation with relevant countries to resolve disputes [1] - The U.S. is portrayed as a major threat to regional peace and stability, accused of creating unrest in the South China Sea by forming alliances and stirring conflict [1]

问：据报道，5月31日，美国防长赫格塞思在香格里拉对话会上发表演讲，大肆渲染中国威胁，就涉台、 南海等问题发表消极言论。请问中方对此有何评论？ 答：赫格塞思无视地区国家求和平谋发展的呼声，兜售阵营对抗的冷战思维，抹黑攻击中国，大肆渲 染"中国威胁论"，充满挑衅挑拨。中方对此强烈不满和坚决反对，已向美方提出严正交涉。 6月1日，外交部网站发布外交部发言人就美国防长赫格塞思在香格里拉对话会上涉华消极言论答记者 台湾问题纯属中国内政，任何外国无权干涉。美方不要妄想把台湾问题当作遏制中国的筹码，勿要玩火。 中方敦促美方切实恪守一个中国原则和中美三个联合公报，停止为"台独"势力撑腰打气。南海的航行和飞 越自由从来都不存在任何问题。中国在南海问题上始终坚持同有关国家通过对话协商妥善处理分歧，坚持 依法依规维护领土主权和海洋权益。美国才是破坏南海和平稳定的最大因素。 问。 中方敦促美方切实尊重地区国家维护和平稳定的努力，停止蓄意破坏地区和平稳定环境，渲染冲突对抗、 加剧地区局势紧张。 事实上，美国才是世界上名副其实的霸权国家，是破坏亚太地区和平稳定的最大因素。美国为维护自身霸 权，推进所谓"印太战略"，在南海地区部署进攻性 ...

Core Points - The recent press conference held by the Ministry of Defense highlighted the activities of China's aircraft carriers, the U.S. "Iron Dome" system, and the Shangri-La Dialogue, which have drawn significant media attention [1][3][10] Group 1: Aircraft Carrier Activities - The movements of China's aircraft carriers, including the Liaoning and the Fujian, have been closely monitored, with specific focus on the Liaoning's recent training exercises in the East China Sea [3][4] - The Japanese Self-Defense Forces reported that the Liaoning conducted carrier-based aircraft takeoff and landing drills closer to Japan, prompting a response from the Japanese government [3][4] - The Chinese Ministry of Defense emphasized that the Liaoning's activities are in accordance with international law and are not aimed at any specific country, urging Japan to adopt a more rational perspective [3][5] Group 2: Fujian Aircraft Carrier - The Fujian, China's first catapult aircraft carrier, is undergoing sea trials, which are essential for its development, although no specific timeline for its commissioning was provided [5][6] - Military experts suggest that the complex electromagnetic catapult technology used in the Fujian requires extensive testing to ensure reliability before it can be officially commissioned [6] Group 3: U.S. "Iron Dome" System - The U.S. plans to invest $175 billion in the "Iron Dome" missile defense system, which aims to protect against various missile threats and is expected to be operational within three years [7] - The deployment of this system has raised concerns about escalating an arms race in outer space, contradicting international treaties aimed at preventing the militarization of space [6][7] Group 4: Shangri-La Dialogue - China will send a delegation from the National Defense University to participate in the Shangri-La Dialogue from May 29 to June 2, aiming to engage in constructive discussions with other nations [10][11] - The Ministry of Defense expressed openness to communication with the U.S. military and emphasized the importance of mutual respect and cooperation in addressing regional security issues [10][11]

美国总统特朗普怒斥华尔街有关他最终不愿落实极端关税威胁的说法，称他的反复横跳是为了争取贸易 让步的战略手段。"这叫谈判，"特朗普5月28日表示，并补充说作为谈判的一部分，他会故意"将数字定 得高到离谱"，然后再"稍微下调一点"。特朗普在椭圆形办公室的一次活动中被问到所谓的"TACO"交 易。这种交易是指投资者在他发出关税威胁后趁市场暴跌把握机会，预测他最终会退缩，股市会回升。 ...