NB Private Equity Partners Limited Total Voting Rights St Peter Port, Guernsey 2 July 2025 NB Private Equity Partners Limited (“NBPE” or the “Company”) Total Voting Rights Total Voting Rights In accordance with DTR 5.6.1R, NB Private Equity Partners Limited (“NBPE” or the “Company”) notifies the market of the following: Class of ShareNumber in issue as at 30 June 2025Voting Entitlement pursuant to the Articles of IncorporationNumber held in Treasury as at 30 June 2025Voting Rights as at 30 June 2025Class A ...

Changing the ownership structure of the South African Reserve Bank could generate fears among investors about expropriation and create more uncertainty about property rights, according to the National Treasury https://t.co/qQlMyBkZUF ...

Political Strategy & Legislative Action - The Democratic party is employing delay tactics, including introducing approximately 500 amendments, each providing 5 minutes of debate, to postpone the vote and raise public awareness [1] - The strategy involves constituents contacting Republican representatives to influence their vote against the bill [1] - The ultimate goal is to defeat the bill entirely and start over with a bipartisan solution [1] Bill's Content & Impact - The bill includes approximately $170 billion for immigration enforcement, with around $45 billion allocated for new detention centers and nearly $30 billion for ICE [2] - The bill is projected to cause approximately 17 million people to lose their healthcare coverage [1][2] - Concerns are raised about the potential for increased immigration enforcement activities, described as "kidnapping" and "human trafficking," impacting communities nationwide [3] Healthcare Implications - The speaker expresses strong opposition to the bill, arguing it will negatively impact healthcare access, particularly for vulnerable populations like individuals with disabilities relying on Medicaid [2] - The speaker criticizes the perspective that the potential loss of healthcare for millions is considered "minutia," emphasizing the human cost [1][2]

Civil Rights Enforcement - The Justice Department showed a lack of interest in enforcing civil rights laws, with approximately 70% of colleagues feeling this way [1] - The administration allegedly weaponized civil rights laws against the people they were designed to protect [1] - The department is accused of using Title Six to act on reverse discrimination cases with thin evidence [1] - The department is accused of engaging in pressure campaigns without thorough investigation [1] Investigation of Minneapolis Police Department - An investigation into the Minneapolis Police Department after George Floyd's murder revealed systemic violations in use of force and first amendment rights [1] - The new administration rescinded the investigative findings related to the Minneapolis Police Department and a troubling pattern of excessive force in Memphis [1] Integrity and Non-Partisanship - The administration prioritized loyalty over the oath to the Constitution [9][10] - The administration sought pathways to achieve desired outcomes regardless of legality [10]

Legal Dispute - Lululemon is suing Costco for allegedly copying its designs [1] - The lawsuit claims Costco produced and sold unauthorized duplicates of Lululemon's athleisure clothing [1] - Lululemon alleges Costco is infringing on its intellectual property rights [1] Company Response - Costco has not yet responded to requests for comment [1]

Core Viewpoint - Lululemon is suing Costco for allegedly selling unauthorized and unlicensed apparel that imitates its products, claiming this undermines its brand reputation and goodwill [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Lululemon alleges that Costco's pants, priced at $10, infringe on its ABC men's pants, which retail for $128 [2]. - The lawsuit claims that Costco's Kirkland Signature sweatshirts, sold for $8, copy Lululemon's Scuba hoodies priced at $118 [3]. - Lululemon asserts that Costco misleads customers into believing these imitations are produced by the original supplier [4]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Financial Implications - The company is seeking to recover financial losses through unspecified damages and a court order to prevent Costco from selling the infringing products [7]. - Lululemon has previously taken legal action against copycats, including a lawsuit against Peloton in 2021, which was settled in 2022 [7]. - The company recently reduced its full-year forecast due to a challenging macroeconomic environment, citing increased costs and competition [8]. Group 3: Market Response - Following the news of the lawsuit, Lululemon's shares increased by 2.2%, although the stock has declined by 36% year-to-date [8].

Information on share capital and voting rights June 2025 Statement made in accordance with article L. 233-8 II of the French commercial Code and articles 221-1 2 ° f) and 223-16 of the AMF Regulations. July 1st, 2025 Statement made by: Nexans S.A.Registered office : 4 Allée de l’Arche - 92400 CourbevoieRCS Nanterre 393 525 852Regulated market of Euronext Paris (Compartment A) DateTotal number of sharesTotal number of voting rightsTheorical (1)Exercisable (2)June 30th, 202543,753,38043,753,380<td style="wid ...

Aung San Suu Kyi’s latest incarceration has attracted much less attention from international human-rights activists than her previous imprisonments https://t.co/FTnTrlmDM6 ...

From @WSJopinion: Rulings on parental rights and pornography sites show the Supreme Court’s sharp liberal-conservative divide on cultural issues https://t.co/joPBtaVE8F ...

This video is of one of the latest Immigration Enforcement raids here in the Southern California area. This is the Cypress Park Home Depot in Los Angeles, and I was on scene just minutes after this happened. You can see the agents, heavily armed in tactical gear, going to pick up day laborers.The video I obtained from volunteers that were on the scene. They're part of a large community self-defense coalition that has been monitoring these activities by federal agents all across Los Angeles County. One of th ...