Core Viewpoint - The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a leading investment option for exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the U.S. equity market, with significant assets and low expense ratios, making it attractive for long-term investors [1][4][10]. Group 1: ETF Overview - SCHD is a passively managed ETF launched on October 20, 2011, and is sponsored by Charles Schwab, with assets exceeding $69.99 billion [1]. - The ETF aims to match the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which focuses on high dividend yielding stocks with a strong record of dividend payments [7]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Large cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations above $10 billion, are generally more stable and exhibit predictable cash flows compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, which typically have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, have historically outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance, although growth stocks may excel in strong bull markets [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - SCHD has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.06%, positioning it among the least expensive ETFs in its category, and it offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 3.81% [4]. - As of August 11, 2025, SCHD has gained approximately 0.25% year-to-date and 4.36% over the past year, with a trading range between $24.32 and $29.53 in the last 52 weeks [8]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Consumer Staples sector, comprising about 19.8% of the portfolio, followed by Energy and Healthcare [5]. - Texas Instruments Inc (TXN) is the largest holding at approximately 4.33% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 40.3% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - SCHD holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating strong expected returns based on various factors, making it a compelling choice for investors interested in the Large Cap Value segment [10]. - Other comparable ETFs include the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), with VYM having $62.20 billion in assets and VTV at $139.70 billion, both with competitive expense ratios [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) provides broad exposure to the Small Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with a focus on companies that typically have higher growth potential but also higher risk [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Overview - VTWG is a passively managed ETF launched on September 22, 2010, and is sponsored by Vanguard [1]. - The fund has accumulated over $1.01 billion in assets, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in its category [1]. - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.1%, making it one of the least expensive options available [4]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Small cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations below $2 billion, are generally considered to have higher growth potential compared to larger companies, albeit with increased risk [2]. - Growth stocks, which VTWG primarily invests in, are characterized by faster growth rates, higher valuations, and above-average sales and earnings growth [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Information Technology sector, comprising about 22% of the portfolio, followed by Healthcare and Industrials [5]. - Individual holdings include Slbbh1142 at approximately 1.19% of total assets, with Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Fabrinet (FN) also among the top holdings [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - VTWG aims to match the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index, which includes companies with higher price/book ratios and growth rates [7]. - As of August 8, 2025, the ETF has gained about 1.32% year-to-date and approximately 14.35% over the past year, with a trading range between $163.60 and $229.76 in the last 52 weeks [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 1.15 and a standard deviation of 23.07% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a higher risk profile [8]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - VTWG holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Small Cap Growth segment [9]. - Other comparable ETFs include the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) with $11.67 billion in assets and the Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) with $19.21 billion, each with different expense ratios [10]. Group 6: Market Trends - Passively managed ETFs are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11].

Core Viewpoint - The WisdomTree U.S. MidCap ETF (EZM) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment of the U.S. equity market, with assets exceeding $772 million, making it a mid-sized ETF in this category [1] Group 1: ETF Overview - Launched on February 23, 2007, EZM is a passively managed ETF sponsored by WisdomTree [1] - The ETF targets mid cap companies with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, which are perceived to have higher growth prospects compared to large cap companies while being less risky than small cap firms [2] Group 2: Financial Metrics - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.38%, which is competitive within its peer group [4] - It offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.33% [4] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Energy sector, with the top three sectors being Energy, Industrials, and Materials [5] - The top 10 holdings account for approximately 107.03% of total assets under management, indicating a concentrated investment strategy [6] Group 4: Performance Analysis - EZM aims to match the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Index, having gained about 0.7% year-to-date and 10.18% over the past year as of August 7, 2025 [7] - The ETF has traded between $51.81 and $68.19 in the past 52 weeks [7] - It has a beta of 1.07 and a standard deviation of 20.67% over the trailing three-year period, categorizing it as a medium risk investment [8] Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - EZM holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating a moderate outlook based on expected returns, expense ratios, and momentum [9] - Other comparable ETFs include the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) with $13.43 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.23%, and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) with $18.16 billion in assets and a lower expense ratio of 0.07% [10] Group 6: Investment Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like EZM are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is a significant player in the Mid Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with over $13.43 billion in assets, and aims to provide broad exposure to this sector [1]. Group 1: ETF Overview - IWS was launched on July 17, 2001, and is passively managed by Blackrock [1]. - The ETF targets mid-cap companies with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, balancing stability and growth potential [2]. Group 2: Value Stocks Characteristics - Value stocks, which IWS focuses on, typically have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates [3]. - Historically, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance, although growth stocks may excel in strong bull markets [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expenses for IWS are 0.23%, which is competitive within its peer group, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.57% [4]. - IWS aims to match the performance of the Russell MidCap Value Index, with a year-to-date return of approximately 4.18% and a one-year return of about 11.37% as of August 7, 2025 [7]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising about 17.7% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Real Estate [5]. - Coinbase Global Inc Class A (COIN) represents about 0.72% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 6.08% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Risk and Alternatives - IWS has a beta of 1.00 and a standard deviation of 17.35% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. - Alternatives to IWS include the First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE), with respective assets of $8.36 billion and $18.16 billion [10].

Core Viewpoint - The iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is a passively managed fund that aims to provide broad exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $727.04 million, making it an average-sized ETF in this category [1] Group 1: Fund Overview - Launched on June 28, 2004, IMCV is sponsored by Blackrock and focuses on mid-cap companies with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, which are seen as having higher growth prospects compared to large-cap companies while being less risky than small-cap firms [1][2] - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.06%, making it one of the least expensive options in its category, and it offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.5% [4] Group 2: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 19.8% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Utilities [5] - Capital One Financial Corp (COF) is the largest individual holding at approximately 2.41% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 12.21% of total assets under management [6] Group 3: Performance Metrics - IMCV aims to match the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, with a year-to-date return of approximately 5.32% and a one-year return of about 12.7% as of August 6, 2025 [7] - The ETF has a beta of 0.95 and a standard deviation of 16.7% over the trailing three-year period, indicating effective diversification with around 286 holdings [8] Group 4: Alternatives and Market Position - IMCV carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a reasonable option for investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment [10] - Other alternatives in the market include the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) with $13.44 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.23%, and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) with $18.18 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.07% [11]

Core Viewpoint - The ALPS (OUSA) ETF offers broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $804.12 million since its launch in July 2015 [1] Group 1: Large Cap Value Characteristics - Large cap companies typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion, characterized by stability and predictable cash flows, resulting in lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Value stocks generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates, but have historically outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance [3] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.48% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.33%, aligning with peer products [4] - OUSA aims to match the performance of the FTSE US Qual / Vol / Yield Factor 5% Capped Index, having gained approximately 2.46% year-to-date and 12.04% over the past year as of August 6, 2025 [7] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest allocation is to the Financials sector at about 26.6%, followed by Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary [5] - Microsoft Corp. constitutes approximately 5.74% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 43.56% of total assets under management [6] Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - OUSA has a beta of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 13.53% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile with effective diversification across 101 holdings [8] - Alternatives include Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have significantly larger asset bases and lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10] Group 5: Bottom Line - Passively managed ETFs like OUSA are favored by both institutional and retail investors for their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is a large-cap value ETF that aims to provide broad exposure to the US equity market, with significant assets under management and a focus on dividend-paying stocks [1][11]. Group 1: ETF Overview - Launched on November 8, 2005, SDY has over $20.17 billion in assets, making it one of the largest ETFs in its category [1]. - The ETF is passively managed and sponsored by State Street Investment Management [1]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Large-cap companies typically have market capitalizations above $10 billion, offering more stability and reliable cash flows compared to mid and small-cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, which SDY focuses on, generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, but they also exhibit lower sales and earnings growth rates [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - SDY has an expense ratio of 0.35% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.58% [4]. - The ETF has gained approximately 5.64% year-to-date and 5.23% over the past year, with a trading range between $121.58 and $144.00 in the last 52 weeks [8]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest sector allocation is to Industrials at about 21%, followed by Consumer Staples and Utilities [5]. - Microchip Technology Inc accounts for approximately 2.49% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 17.82% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Risk and Alternatives - SDY seeks to match the performance of the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, which includes companies that have consistently increased dividends for at least 20 years [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 0.78 and a standard deviation of 14.28% over the trailing three years, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. - Alternatives to SDY include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article compares Global Industrial (GIC) and W.W. Grainger (GWW) to determine which stock represents a better undervalued investment opportunity for investors in the Industrial Services sector [1]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - GIC currently holds a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while GWW has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - The Zacks Rank system emphasizes companies with positive earnings estimate revisions, suggesting that GIC is likely experiencing a more favorable earnings outlook compared to GWW [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - GIC has a forward P/E ratio of 16.94, significantly lower than GWW's forward P/E of 23.04, indicating that GIC may be undervalued relative to GWW [5]. - The PEG ratio for GIC is 1.06, while GWW's PEG ratio is 2.44, further suggesting that GIC is a more attractive value option when considering expected earnings growth [5]. - GIC's P/B ratio stands at 4.18, compared to GWW's P/B of 10.97, reinforcing the notion that GIC is undervalued based on its market value relative to book value [6]. - These valuation metrics contribute to GIC's Value grade of B, while GWW has a Value grade of C, indicating a stronger value proposition for GIC [6]. Group 3: Conclusion on Investment Opportunity - Given the improving earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics, GIC is positioned as the superior value option in the current market [7].

Core Viewpoint - The First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is a passively managed ETF that aims to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with significant assets under management and a focus on dividend-paying companies [1][7]. Group 1: ETF Overview - RDVY was launched on January 7, 2014, and has accumulated over $15.46 billion in assets, making it one of the larger ETFs in its category [1]. - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.48% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.44% [4]. - It seeks to match the performance of the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers Index, which includes companies with a history of paying dividends [7]. Group 2: Market Characteristics - Large cap companies, typically with market capitalizations above $10 billion, are considered more stable with predictable cash flows and lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, which RDVY focuses on, generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, and while they have lower sales and earnings growth rates, they have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 36.5% of the portfolio, followed by Information Technology and Industrials [5]. - Meta Platforms Inc. (META) accounts for approximately 2.3% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 22.2% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - As of August 1, 2025, RDVY has gained approximately 7.84% year-to-date and 9.92% over the past year, with a trading range between $51.60 and $64.37 in the past 52 weeks [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 1.07 and a standard deviation of 18.88% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - RDVY carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a sufficient option for investors seeking exposure to the Large Cap Value area [9]. - Alternative ETFs in this space include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) with $69.21 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.06%, and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) with $139.05 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.04% [10]. Group 6: Investor Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like RDVY are increasingly favored by retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $256.19 million, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in this category [1]. Group 1: Mid Cap Value Characteristics - Mid cap companies, with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, are perceived to have higher growth prospects compared to large cap companies and are considered less risky than small cap companies, making them stable and growth-oriented investments [2]. - Value stocks typically exhibit lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates, but have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets, although they may underperform during strong bull markets [3]. Group 2: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expenses for RFV are 0.35%, which is competitive with most peer products, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.21% [4]. - RFV aims to match the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index, having gained approximately 1.81% year-to-date and 3.75% over the past year, with a trading range of $97.97 to $131.23 in the last 52 weeks [7]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Consumer Discretionary sector, comprising about 26% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Financials [5]. - Concentrix Corp (CNXC) represents about 4.55% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 30.93% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - RFV has a beta of 1.17 and a standard deviation of 22.3% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a higher risk profile, but it diversifies company-specific risk with around 84 holdings [8]. - Alternatives to RFV include the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE), which have significantly larger asset bases of $13.45 billion and $18.17 billion, respectively, with lower expense ratios of 0.23% and 0.07% [11]. Group 5: Investment Trends - There is a growing trend among retail and institutional investors towards passively managed ETFs due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12].