投资咨询业务资格:证监许可【2012】31号 ITG国贸期货 | | | | | 聚酯数据日报 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | 国贸期货研究院 | | 投资咨询号: Z0017251 | 2025/6/26 | | | | 能源化工研究中心 | 陈胜 | | 从业资格号:F3066728 | | | 指标 | 2025/6/24 | 2025/6/25 | 变动值 | 行情综述 | | | INE原油(元/桶) | 518. 6 | 508. 6 | -10.00 | 成交情况: | | SC | PTA-SC(元/陣) | 1007. 3 | 1094. 0 | 86. 67 | PTA: PTA行情下跌,地缘局势缓和,市场预估原油续 跌,PTA行情下跌。PTA现货货少,现货基差仍然较强 | | | PTA/SC(比价) | 1.2673 | 1. 2960 | 0. 0287 | | | | CFR中国PX | 859 | 849 | -10 | | | PX | PX-石脑油价差 | 217 | 263 | 46 | | | | PTA主力 ...

行业 原油日报 日期 2025 年 6 月 26 日 021-60635738 lijie@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3031215 021-60635737 renjunchi@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3037892 028-8663 0631 penghaozhou@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3065843 021-60635740 pengjinglin@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3075681 021-60635570 liuyouran@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F03094925 研究员：李金（甲醇） 021-60635730 lijin@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3015157 021-60635727 fengzeren@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F03134307 能源化工研究团队 研究员：李捷,CFA（原油沥青） 研究员：任俊弛（PTA、MEG） 研究员：彭浩洲（工业硅碳市场） 研究员 ...

Core Viewpoint - The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran could lead to significant disruptions in global oil supply, causing oil prices to surge and impacting economies worldwide [2][4][5]. Geopolitical Impact - The attack on Iran's nuclear facilities has heightened tensions in the Middle East, with global attention on Iran's possible retaliation against U.S. military bases [2]. - Iran's parliament has suggested closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for one-third of the world's oil shipments, which could severely disrupt the global oil supply chain [2]. Economic Consequences - If the Strait is closed, oil prices could rise to $130 per barrel, significantly impacting countries like China, which imports 553 million tons of crude oil annually, costing approximately 2.3 trillion yuan (about $325.2 billion) [5][6]. - The potential increase in oil prices would lead to higher domestic prices in the U.S., putting pressure on the economy and possibly affecting government policies [5]. Affected Countries - Israel is expected to be minimally affected due to its reliance on non-maritime oil supplies and strong economic resilience [4]. - China, Japan, South Korea, and India are among the countries that would face significant economic losses and supply chain disruptions if the Strait is closed [8]. - Middle Eastern oil-producing countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE would oppose the closure, as it would hinder their ability to profit from oil sales despite potential price increases [8][10]. Strategic Considerations - Iran's decision to close the Strait may backfire, as it heavily relies on oil exports for revenue, and such a move could lead to military intervention by the U.S. to reopen the Strait [10][12]. - The analysis suggests that the closure of the Strait would be detrimental to nearly all countries involved, both oil producers and consumers, with China being particularly vulnerable due to its dependence on maritime oil transport [10][12].

Group 1 - Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire on June 24, alleviating market concerns over tensions, leading to a decline in international oil prices [1] - NYMEX crude oil futures for August fell by $4.14 to $64.37 per barrel, a decrease of 6.04% [1] - ICE Brent crude oil futures for August dropped by $4.34 to $67.14 per barrel, a decrease of 6.07% [1] - China's INE crude oil futures for the main contract 2508 fell by 16.3 to 553.6 yuan per barrel, with a night session drop of 51.3 to 502.3 yuan per barrel [1] Group 2 - Trump stated on his social media platform that China can continue purchasing oil from Iran and expressed hope that China would also buy oil from the U.S. [2] - The White House clarified that Trump's comments do not indicate a relaxation of U.S. sanctions, emphasizing that the focus is on encouraging imports of U.S. oil rather than Iranian oil [2] - Historically, the U.S. has imposed sanctions on several Chinese refineries and ports for importing Iranian oil [2] Group 3 - By March 2025, China's oil purchases from the U.S. are projected to decrease by 90% year-on-year, from a peak of 29 million barrels per month to approximately 3 million barrels per month [4] Group 4 - In response to Trump's comments, China's Foreign Ministry stated that it will take reasonable energy security measures based on its national interests [5]

美、布两油短线走高0.5美元，现分别报65.91美元/桶和66.92美元/桶。 ...

据外交人士透露，会谈内容可能涉及乌克兰拟采购的新防空系统、对俄制裁以及国际油价上限 等关键议题。 据央视新闻， 当地时间6月25日，美国总统特朗普与乌克兰总统泽连斯基在荷兰海牙举行会 谈 。 这是特朗普4月以来，与泽连斯基的首次面对面会谈。 ...

1) Will US intervention continue, and how will regional dynamics be impacted? Following the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, Pres. Trump warned that more targets remain if Iran fails to back down. Iran vowed retaliation, and Israel is on high alert after intercepting missiles from Iranian proxies. Key Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar, have called for restraint amid fears of regional escalation and threats to oil infrastructure. We are watching for signs of further escalation and how they may ...

Group 1 - Oil prices are attempting to rebound after experiencing a sell-off due to easing tensions in the Israel-Iran conflict [1] - The market focus has shifted back to fundamentals, with traders questioning whether oil prices can regain upward momentum from current levels [1] - Prior to the recent escalation in conflict, oil prices had already been on an upward trend since April [1]

关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、陈达飞、李欣越、王茂宇 联系人 | 李欣越 摘要 6月以来，伊以冲突升温的背景下，伊朗一度威胁封锁霍尔木兹海峡。伊朗进行海峡封锁的可行性、可能 性与潜在影响？本文分析，可供参考。 一、封锁"霍尔木兹"的可能性？两重约束下可能性较低，市场也并不"买单" 近期，伊朗再度威胁要封锁霍尔木兹海峡。 6月13日，以色列针对伊朗发起"Rising Lion"行动，伊朗随即 展开报复。6月22日，伊朗议会通过封锁霍尔木兹海峡的决议，只差最高国家安全委员会做出批准。6月 24日，伊以宣布停火，但停火后双方仍有摩擦，冲突尚未完全平息。 伊朗封锁霍尔木兹海峡具有较高可行性，但面临经济约束与海湾国家的压力。 一方面，伊朗深受滞胀困 扰，封锁海峡对伊朗财政收入有明显冲击；另一方面，伊拉克、沙特等海湾国家高度依赖石油开采，贸 然封锁也会加深与其他中东邻国的隔阂。这或成伊朗封锁海峡的主要掣肘。 6月24日伊以宣布停火后，市场对封锁海峡的担忧已明显退坡。 1）Polymarket隐含的伊朗2025年封锁海 峡的可能性已由53%回落至17%。2）在伊以宣布停火后，油价已跌至6月12日伊以冲突爆发 ...

Core Viewpoint - The premium space created by geopolitical tensions has been fully absorbed, leading to a significant drop in SC crude oil prices, raising questions about whether this is a short-term adjustment or a long-term trend [1] Group 1 - Analysts warn that the impact of geopolitical factors on oil prices has not been completely factored in, suggesting potential for further price stabilization [1]