Estonia’s defense chief said any decision to withdraw US troops from Europe would be discussed with NATO https://t.co/yCDKOoKrEw ...

lmao as if what Ukrainians think has any bearing whatsoever on who the NATO-luminati decides Ukraine’s president will be — a headline like this is just them revving up a justification so whoever astroturfed head of state gets installed next looks like it came “from the people”Chay Bowes (@BowesChay):I hate to say I told you so, but.. https://t.co/JLx0H2X6Iy ...

But I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him. You know, we had a deal done four times and then you go home and you see he just attacked a nursing home.Yes. Or something in Kiev. I said, "What the hell was that all about?" Do you trust him.I trust almost nobody. We made last week is amazing. The uh you know the 5% nobody thought that was possible.And it amounts to over a trillion dollars a year. I think NATO is now becoming uh the opposite of that. I do think it was passed and it was very unfair be ...

Geopolitical Implications - Trump's NATO weapons deal sparks anger from the MAGA wing, suggesting potential shifts in US foreign policy and defense spending [1] - The phrase "'This is not our war'" indicates a potential isolationist stance, which could impact international relations and defense alliances [1]

And we've made a deal today, and I'm going to have Mark speak about it, but we've made a deal today where we are going to be sending them weapons, and they're going to be paying for them. We, the United States, will not be having any payment made. Uh, we're not buying it, but we will manufacture it and they're going to be paying for it.Uh, our last meeting of a month ago is very successful in that they agreed to 5%, which is more than a trillion dollars a year. So they have a lot of money and they these are ...

Defense Industry & International Relations - The United States will provide weapons to unspecified nations, with those nations paying for them [1] - The US will manufacture the weapons, and the recipient nations will bear the cost [1] - A previous meeting resulted in an agreement for 5%, equating to over 1 trillion dollars annually from wealthy nations [1] - These wealthy nations are strongly committed to this arrangement [2] - The US expresses reluctance to increase its financial commitment [2] - The US will supply NATO with its highest quality weaponry [2]

President Trump meets with the Secretary General of NATO Mark Rutte on Monday. For access to live and exclusive video from CNBC subscribe to CNBC PRO: https://cnb.cx/42d859g » Subscribe to CNBC TV: https://cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision » Subscribe to CNBC: https://cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC » Watch CNBC on the go with CNBC+: https://www.cnbc.com/WatchCNBCPlus Turn to CNBC TV for the latest stock market news and analysis. From market futures to live price updates CNBC is the leader in business news worldwide. Con ...

Geopolitical Implications - US prepares to send new American weapons to Ukraine [1] - Weapons will be sent via purchases from NATO allies [1] - Trump plans to make a "major statement" on Russia [1]

Geopolitical Landscape - Iceland, a founding member of NATO, has historically depended on the United States for its defense [1] - Europe is rearming, and the United States is pressuring countries that are lagging in defense spending [1] - Iceland is feeling increased pressure related to defense contributions [1]

Even as the Labour prime minister has shepherded Britain back into the European fold, nannied Donald Trump and backed Ukraine and NATO, the crisis at home has only deepened https://t.co/Qb1KqRYLJT ...