Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the misleading use of trademarks by companies, which often leads to consumer confusion and potential exploitation of their purchasing decisions [1][2][3]. Group 1: Misleading Trademarks - Companies are using trademarks that create confusion, such as "一品牛肉干" which is actually a pork product, misleading consumers into thinking they are purchasing beef [1]. - Examples include "小尾花黑猪肝" which misleads consumers into believing they are buying a premium product when it is just regular pork liver [2]. - The use of descriptive terms in trademarks, like "六个核桃" or "手打"挂面, does not guarantee the product's quality or characteristics, leading to consumer misconceptions [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Issues - The article highlights that many misleading trademarks have passed regulatory scrutiny, indicating potential flaws in the trademark examination process [5][9]. - The distinction between registered and unregistered trademarks is emphasized, with unregistered trademarks being easier to misuse without oversight [4]. - There is a call for improved regulatory frameworks to prevent misleading trademarks from being registered and used in the market [10][11]. Group 3: Consumer Impact - Consumers often find it difficult to seek redress when misled by trademarks, as the burden of proof lies heavily on them [8][10]. - The article notes that misleading trademarks not only harm consumers but also disrupt fair market competition, potentially driving honest businesses out of the market [8]. - There are instances where consumers have paid significantly more for products due to misleading branding, such as "壹号土" black pork ribs priced much higher than regular options [7]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - The article suggests that a multi-faceted approach is needed to address the issue, including better regulatory practices and consumer education [10][11]. - It advocates for a collaborative effort among regulatory bodies, industry associations, and consumers to create a more transparent and fair market environment [11]. - The establishment of a credit commitment system for trademark registration is proposed to penalize those who obtain trademarks through deceptive means [11].

本文来自微信公众号：APPSO （ID：appsolution），作者：APPSO，原文标题：《一句隐藏提示词引爆学术圈！明星教授被曝"骚操作"让 AI 给好评，刚 刚发文反思》，题图来自：AI生成 谢赛宁随后承认疏忽，称并不知情，表示自己未能履行好导师职责。根据他的描述，起因于一位日本访问学生借用了其他研究者在社交媒体上开玩笑提出 的"提示词插入"做法，误以为可用以应对AI审稿机制。 在一篇详细的回应帖中，谢赛宁写道： 谢谢你让我注意到这件事。说实话，我之前真的没有意识到这个问题，直到最近这些帖子在网上传播开来。我绝不会鼓励我的学生做出这种行 为——如果我是领域主席（Area Chair），凡是有这种提示词的论文，我一定会直接拒稿。 不过话说回来，对于任何有问题的投稿，所有合著者都要承担责任，这点没有借口。这次事件也提醒了我，作为导师，我不仅要检查最终的 PDF文件，也应该认真查看整个投稿文件。在此之前，我确实没有意识到这方面的必要性。 我想花点时间分享一下我们过去一周内部彻查后发现的情况——所有内容都有日志和截图为证，如有需要可以提供。 1.背景 我以为用AI工具给论文降AIGC率已经够离谱了，但今天的学 ...

只需0.02秒，"黄牛"就能抢到一个热门医院的专家号。普通患者花上几个星期都抢不到专家号，有不法 分子却一年能挂号5000余次。 贩卖医院号源的"黄牛"也称"号贩子"。为解决老百姓就医难的问题，近日，江苏南京警方在多地实施集 中抓捕，成功端掉3个非法入侵医院挂号系统的"黑客黄牛"团伙，抓获犯罪嫌疑人22人，涉案金额超200 万元。 经查，不法分子通过特制软件批量抢占医院专家号号源后，再以高价转卖给急需救治的患者，或者 以"占坑洗号"的方式，将部分热门专家号炒至1000余元。这些乱象的背后，究竟隐藏着一条怎样的利益 链条？记者进行了深入探访。 专家号"秒光" 患者找"黄牛"需大幅加价 去年底，家住江苏省扬州市宝应县的曲先生病了，需到南京就诊。他在网上搜索发现，江苏省某三甲医 院的一名医生正好擅长治疗他患的疾病。 这家医院的微信公众号每天下午6点准时放号。曲先生定好闹钟，卡着时间点来抢号，可连着抢了一星 期，每次结果都是"秒光"。 无奈之下，曲先生只好在网上找"黄牛"来代办。据曲先生回忆，2024年12月24日，他在网上添加了一名 微信昵称为"医院帮帮"的"黄牛"。对方告诉他，支付300元的代办费，便可以帮忙挂到 ...

Group 1 - The refinancing market is significantly more active than the IPO market, with 26 refinancing applications accepted compared to only 2 IPO applications during March-April 2025 [1][3] - The IPO market shows signs of recovery with 2 companies receiving acceptance for their initial public offerings, 4 companies passing the review process, and a total fundraising amount reaching 7.952 billion yuan [3] - The structural characteristics of the capital market are reflected in the urgent need for listed companies to seek funding through refinancing, while the pace of new IPO applications remains slow due to strict regulatory standards [3] Group 2 - Two anonymous whistleblower cases have been disclosed by regulatory authorities, highlighting clear violations related to IPO companies Yunfeng New Materials and Ankaite [4] - The first case involves deficiencies in the management of research and development materials at Yunfeng New Materials, which is linked to the real estate industry, revealing issues with internal control and material tracking [4][5] - The second case concerning Ankaite indicates incomplete rectification of historical issues, with irregularities in the sales of waste materials and funds being transferred to the personal accounts of actual controllers [4][5]

Core Viewpoint - A U.S. federal judge has canceled the trial scheduled for June 23 regarding the Boeing 737 MAX crashes, which resulted in the deaths of 346 people in two separate incidents involving Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Incident Overview** - The crashes occurred in October 2018 and March 2019, involving Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines respectively [1] - Both incidents were linked to safety design flaws in the new software system of the Boeing 737 MAX [1] - **Regulatory and Compliance Issues** - Boeing allegedly concealed risks associated with the software system during the certification process with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) [1] - The company also failed to enhance pilot training related to the software system [1]

美国参议员沃伦和桑德斯表示，特朗普必须堵住附带权益漏洞。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report emphasizes the growing importance of "threat intelligence" in the context of increasing cybersecurity threats, shifting from passive to proactive security strategies [1][2][3] Market Overview - The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the threat intelligence market in China, including market size, key players, and future trends [1][2][37] - It highlights the significant growth in cyber threats, with a 76% increase in the number of victims of large-scale ransomware attacks and a 102% increase in attack frequency in certain industries [3][6] Development Insights - Future trends in the threat intelligence industry are explored, focusing on three main areas: international expansion of intelligence, AI large models, and vulnerability intelligence [2][70][74] - The report discusses the evolution of threat intelligence in compliance, technology, and application, indicating potential market opportunities [2] Background on Cyber Threats - The global landscape of cyber threats is characterized by an increase in both the number of attackers and the frequency of attacks, with significant impacts on various industries [3][6][11] - The digital transformation of enterprises is expanding their exposure to cyber threats, necessitating more comprehensive and timely protective measures [6][11] Threat Intelligence Definition and Value - Threat intelligence is defined as a high-level capability that enhances the proactive and timely defense of security products, allowing for real-time collection and analysis of global threat information [16][19][22] - The value of threat intelligence lies in its ability to improve proactive defense capabilities and enhance overall security operations for enterprises [22] Comparison of Domestic and International Development - The development trajectory of the threat intelligence industry in China is similar to that of overseas markets, but it lags in speed and maturity due to a later start [24] - Differences in security needs have led to variations in the integration of threat intelligence products between domestic and international markets [24] Business Models in China's Threat Intelligence Industry - The market primarily utilizes two approaches: direct application and consumption of threat intelligence data and platforms, and integration with security monitoring and response products [27] - The report outlines three types of pure intelligence products and various integration methods that form comprehensive products [27] Product Capabilities and Competitiveness - Key product capability indicators include accuracy, richness, and timeliness, while vendor competitiveness is driven by data and technology [30] - The ability to collect and analyze security big data is identified as a core competitive advantage for companies in the threat intelligence sector [30] Characteristics of Major Vendors - Major vendors in the threat intelligence space are differentiated by their foundational data, service experience, and business characteristics, leading to unique product capabilities [33] - The report provides a comparative analysis of five major vendors, highlighting their strengths and market positions [35] Market Size and Growth - The threat intelligence market in China experienced a short-term decline due to the pandemic, with a projected market size of 1.61 billion yuan in 2024, reflecting a slight decrease from 2023 [37][38] - The report anticipates a steady growth phase for the industry, driven by increasing security demands and product integration [38][41] Competitive Landscape - The market is characterized as low-concentration and oligopolistic, with leading firms like 微步在线, 腾讯安全, and 奇安信 establishing competitive advantages through differentiated capabilities [41] - The integration of new technologies such as AI and big data into threat intelligence is expected to drive competition and innovation in the industry [41] Vendor Solutions - Major vendors like 微步在线, 奇安信, and 腾讯安全 offer comprehensive threat intelligence solutions, leveraging advanced technologies to enhance security measures [45][58] - These solutions include various products and services aimed at improving threat detection, response, and overall security posture for enterprises [48][55][61]

【环球网报道 记者 赵建东】综合《纽约时报》、美国广播公司（ABC）等多家美媒消息，当地时间16 日凌晨，美国路易斯安那州新奥尔良市一所监狱10名囚犯通过凿开牢房墙壁越狱。当地警方称，这 些"持械且危险"的在逃囚犯可能获得了狱方内部人员的协助。截至目前，已有两名囚犯被捕，仍有八人 在逃。 报道称，越狱大约发生在凌晨00:23左右，监控画面显示，囚犯们从监狱装卸区的门逃出后，翻越围墙 并穿过州际公路。警方从现场调查发现，涉事牢房的墙壁被凿出一个"仅能一人挤过"的矩形洞口，紧邻 洞口的金属马桶和洗手池被整体拆下。洞口上方还留有涂鸦：一张吐舌头的笑脸及挑衅文字"太容易 了，笑死"。 当地警方称目前已有两名囚犯被捕。其余在逃囚犯可能仍藏匿新奥尔良，警方已联合联邦调查局、司法 警察等多部门展开追捕。新奥尔良警察局长柯克帕特里克警告，这些逃犯均为暴力犯罪者，部分人面临 谋杀指控，其中一名逃犯因2018年狂欢节枪击案被判谋杀罪。警方已转移部分受害家庭至安全地点，并 呼吁民众提供线索，强调"包庇逃犯将面临指控"。 据当地媒体报道，警长赫特森去年10月就曾表示，该监狱关押约1500人，远超市议会设定的1250人上限 及900人 ...

天眼查资料显示，启明信息技术股份有限公司，成立于2000年，位于长春市，是一家以从事软件和信息 技术服务业为主的企业。企业注册资本40854.8455万人民币。通过天眼查大数据分析，启明信息技术股 份有限公司共对外投资了9家企业，参与招投标项目1753次，财产线索方面有商标信息30条，专利信息 426条，此外企业还拥有行政许可15个。 吉林省启明安信信息安全技术有限公司，成立于2010年，位于吉林市，是一家以从事软件和信息技术服 务业为主的企业。企业注册资本8000万人民币。通过天眼查大数据分析，吉林省启明安信信息安全技术 有限公司参与招投标项目78次，专利信息5条，此外企业还拥有行政许可2个。 金融界2025年5月17日消息，国家知识产权局信息显示，启明信息技术股份有限公司；吉林省启明安信 信息安全技术有限公司申请一项名为"一种基于攻击图的资产漏洞修复优先级评估方法"的专利，公开号 CN119996056A，申请日期为 2025 年 3 月。 专利摘要显示，本发明公开了一种基于攻击图的资产漏洞修复优先级评估方法，包括以下步骤：S1.对 所有资产进行探测，并对探测到的资产进行漏洞扫描；S2.对探测到的资产进行 ...

Core Viewpoint - Jiangxi Biological has distributed a total of 126 million yuan in dividends from 2023 to 2024, which accounts for 80.25% of its net profit during the same period, raising concerns about financial sustainability before its IPO [1][2]. Financial Performance - Jiangxi Biological reported revenues of 142 million, 198 million, and 221 million yuan over the past three years, with corresponding profits of 26.468 million, 55.481 million, and 75.14 million yuan, totaling 157 million yuan in profit [2]. - The company achieved gross profits of 107 million, 134 million, and 155 million yuan, with gross margins of 75.4%, 67.8%, and 70.3% respectively [2]. Dividend Distribution - The company declared dividends of 10 million yuan in May 2023 and 76 million yuan in October 2023, followed by an additional 40.1 million yuan in September 2024, leading to a cumulative dividend payout of 126 million yuan [2]. Shareholding Structure - The controlling shareholder, Jing Yue, holds approximately 76.64% of the voting rights through Hainan Zhizheng and Qianhai Tianzheng [2]. Expenditure Analysis - Jiangxi Biological's sales expenses from 2022 to 2024 totaled 94.62 million yuan, with over 70% allocated to promotional activities, primarily for academic conferences and hospital promotions [3]. - In contrast, R&D expenditures have significantly decreased, with a 43.5% year-on-year drop in 2024 to 13.68 million yuan, representing only 6.33% of revenue, which is below the industry average of 15%-20% [3]. R&D and Quality Control Issues - The company’s R&D spending in 2024 was less than half of its distribution costs, indicating a concerning imbalance favoring marketing over research [3]. - Jiangxi Biological has faced penalties for producing substandard drugs, including a fine of 1.33 million yuan in 2018 for producing defective tetanus antitoxin, highlighting ongoing quality control issues [3]. - The company's MSCI ESG rating is only CCC, significantly below the industry average of BB, reflecting its quality management challenges [3].