There is no global parliament to pass rules that reflect the will of 8bn people. Instead, international law is about finding a balance between universal values and national interests, and it is hard to reach a consensus or enforce laws https://t.co/7MaCfkpQoe ...

International Relations - France joins other countries in recognizing Palestine as a State [1] - The recognition's meaning is explored in the context of international law [1] - The question of whether Palestine is a State under international law is raised [1]

Some legal experts worry that the International Court of Justice risks undermining its own authority—and international law more broadly—by issuing such a sweeping ruling on an issue that cuts to the heart of political trade-offs within countries https://t.co/QxrMkN56Sb ...

International Relations & Diplomacy - Brazil champions international law and diplomatic dispute settlement [1] - Brazil does not adopt an "à la carte" approach to international law [1] - Brazil is described as a country without enemies [1]

Constitutional & Legal Issues - The Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war, while the President serves as commander-in-chief during a declared war [2] - Significant legal debate exists regarding what constitutes a "war" domestically, considering duration and goals [2][3] - International law considerations include assessing intelligence to determine if military action was a defensive maneuver, involved an imminent threat, and was a proportional response [3] - The White House is limiting intelligence sharing with Congress, raising concerns about transparency and oversight [4] Checks and Balances & Congressional Oversight - Concerns are raised that the current administration believes Congress has no role in reviewing executive actions, mirroring arguments made in courts [6] - Traditionally, presidents from both parties have briefed Congress on intelligence matters, highlighting the current administration's deviation from this practice [7][8] - Congress has been abdicating its responsibility regarding war powers since World War II, the last time a formal declaration of war occurred [13] - The lack of accountability after military action, specifically regarding providing information to assess the legality under international law, is a key concern [23] International Law Considerations - Under international law, a country can act in self-defense or collective self-defense if there is imminent harm, the action is necessary, and the response is proportional [21][22] - Determining whether a military strike violates international law requires access to pre-strike intelligence [23]

Defense Spending & NATO - NATO aims to reach 5% defense spending target, requiring difficult decisions from member states [5] - The challenge lies in justifying defense spending during peacetime [5] - NATO Secretary General is working to keep European countries united on defense spending [6] - Discussions include opening financial possibilities for member states to spend more and promoting joint procurement [7] - The 2% of GDP spending pledge by 2024 was not met by all countries [9] - The summit's primary goal is to secure agreement on moving to 5% of defense spending [10] - Article 5 of NATO is clear: an attack on one is an attack on all [13] Geopolitical Issues & Ukraine - Every new war diverts attention from ongoing conflicts, such as the one in Ukraine [17] - The EU has supported Ukraine's military with €24 billion in 2024, exceeding last year's support [18] - The EU is pursuing an 18th package of sanctions against Russia [18] - Discussions are planned regarding the use of Russian frozen assets to aid Ukraine [19][20] International Relations & Trade - The EU is working towards a trade deal with the United States by July 9th [20] - Canada's potential relationship with the EU is being considered, despite geographical challenges [21][22]

Geopolitical Stance - The Islamic Republic of Iran strongly condemns the United States' military aggression against its nuclear facilities [1] - Iran views the U S action as a grave violation of the UN charter and international law [1] - Iran asserts its right to defend its sovereignty and security against U S military aggression and actions of the Israeli regime [2][3] Accusations and Responsibility - Iran holds the U S administration fully responsible for the consequences of its actions [2] - Iran accuses the U S of colluding with the "genocidal Israeli regime" in the attack [2] Sovereignty and Independence - Iran states it will never compromise its independence and sovereignty [2]

Nuclear Program & International Law - Peaceful nuclear facilities are under full IAEA monitoring [1] - Attacking nuclear facilities is banned under international law [1] - Israel's attacks on nuclear facilities are considered grave war crimes [1] - The country claims the right to defend its territorial integrity, national sovereignty, and security [1] - A meeting with Americans was scheduled for June 15th to resolve issues related to the peaceful nuclear program [2] - The attack is viewed as a betrayal of diplomacy and a blow to international law and the UN system [2]

International Law & Security - US intelligence and IEA suggest no unequivocal evidence of Iran building a nuclear bomb, questioning the legality of potential conflicts [1] - The discussion raises concerns about the future of international human rights law and the conduct of warfare in the absence of evidence-based declarations of war [1] - The erosion of an international norms-based world order rooted in law is leading to escalating "forever wars" [2] US Policy & Legislation - Questions arise regarding the relevance and application of the US War Powers Act, specifically the 45-90 day provision [2]