Just now on the central economic policy of this Trump administration in a huge blow to the White House and its agenda and a big win I would say for everyone else. A federal appeals court has just ruled that Trump's sprawling tariffs are unlawful and invalid. Of course, the president has been obsessed with imposing his willy-nilly tariffs on Americans. In fact, it has been the central plank of his entire economic agenda.Now, it has been wildly unpopular. It's pulling underwater. It is costing consumers and c ...

[Music] What do you mean by being voiceless. Anybody answer. For someone it was a metaphor. For me, it was a reality.I was a kid who was being bullied for my ex existence, for my speech, for my whole life sitting at a backbench like you. Even though there were many powerful lessons which I learned, but there's something missing yet. Not courage, not sympathy, not anger, the knowledge, the access to knowledge.And we all have that knowledge. Do we. I don't think so.If we do so, why do we do that. But there's ...

In Germany, a new law risks stoking social tensions by asking youth to fight for a system that shows little signs of working for them. https://t.co/6SNtDo0cx2 ...

Legal Landscape - Two new laws have transformed the legal landscape in Hong Kong [1] - These are difficult times in ill-charted territory for judges in Hong Kong [1]

Legal & Regulatory - A federal judge has blocked a Texas law requiring the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms [1] Education - The Texas law mandated the display of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms [1]

Geopolitical Analysis - China's governance, led by engineers, excels in construction, while the US, led by lawyers, excels in rule-making [1]

So Paxton was just on Fox this past hour to respond to you calling him out on X earlier, saying he is lying, trying to silence you. Here's what he had to say back. >> The judge gave him a direct order, which was you can no longer fund raise.And in his rally, he clearly violated that order. It's not even questionable. So look, we're just following the law. He is not following the law.And that's where his problems lie, not with me. My job is to enforce the law and that's exactly what I plan on doing. >> So, t ...

Legal & Regulatory - A new Swedish law will criminalize paying for live porn on websites [1] - The law does not criminalize those who perform the online sex acts [1] Industry Perspective - There are better ways to regulate sex work than the new Swedish law [1]

Legal & Regulatory - A new Swedish law will criminalize paying for live porn on websites [1] - The law does not criminalize those who perform the online sex acts [1] Industry Implication - The article suggests there are better ways to regulate sex work than the new Swedish law [1]

Core Argument - The legal system prioritizes adherence to rules and procedures over the pursuit of truth, potentially leading to unjust outcomes [1] - The introduction of AI in the judiciary could improve efficiency but also risks perpetuating existing biases present in historical data [5][6][7] - AI should be used to support the judiciary by handling simple cases and administrative tasks, freeing up judges to focus on complex cases requiring human judgment and empathy [9][10][14] AI in Judiciary - Some countries are already implementing AI in their judicial systems for tasks such as case classification, analysis, and even generating draft judgments [3][4] - Estonia is testing an AI system for resolving small civil disputes up to 7,000 EUR, while the US uses AI to assess recidivism risk [4] - AI's ability to quickly analyze vast amounts of data can improve efficiency, but its reliance on historical data can lead to biased outcomes [5][9] Concerns and Limitations - AI algorithms learn from past data, which may contain biases and prejudices, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes [5][6][7] - Justice requires empathy, compassion, and responsibility, qualities that AI currently lacks, making it unsuitable for making final judgments in all cases [19] - Human judges are essential for considering the context and nuances of individual cases, ensuring that justice is served in a fair and equitable manner [14][15][17][18] Call to Action - Society needs to actively participate in the debate and decision-making process regarding the implementation of AI in the judiciary to ensure that it aligns with human values and principles [22] - It is crucial to define the boundaries of AI's role in the legal system, determining which cases are suitable for AI resolution and which require human judgment [20][21]