Nuclear weapon
Search documents
What's really left of Iran's nuclear program? #politics #iran #shorts
Bloomberg Television· 2025-06-23 17:57
Nuclear Program Status - US strikes reportedly damaged Iran's declared nuclear sites, including the uranium enrichment facility at Fordo [1][2] - The strikes have disrupted Iran's ability to produce new uranium at inspected facilities [3] - Approximately 9,000 kg of enriched uranium is unaccounted for, including 400 kg nearing weapons-grade levels [3] International Oversight - International inspectors have been unable to monitor Iran's enriched uranium stockpile for over a week [4] - There are concerns that the missing uranium could be moved to a clandestine site for further enrichment [4]
NATO Chief: U.S. Strikes on Iran Didn’t Violate International Law | WSJ News
WSJ News· 2025-06-23 16:25
long agreed that Iran must not develop a nuclear weapon allies have repe Iran to meet obligations under the nonpreration treaty my biggest fear would be Iran to own and be able to use and deploy a nuclear weapon stringle hold on Israel on the whole region and other parts of the world and that is why NATO has said Iran should not and this is a consistent position of NATO internation US. ...
Europe, NATO Brace for Iran’s Response After US Strikes
Bloomberg Television· 2025-06-23 06:05
Geopolitical Landscape & Diplomatic Stance - European leaders emphasize de-escalation and diplomacy as the primary solution to Middle East tensions, suggesting military action is not the answer [1] - While initially supportive of Israeli strikes, some European leaders are now expressing reticence [2] - A key message remains that Iran should never be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons [3] - The EU stresses the importance of respecting international law, potentially a tacit criticism of US actions [4] US Foreign Policy & European Concerns - The debate centers on whether US airstrikes were preemptive (based on imminent danger) or preventative (based on a longer-term threat), raising concerns internationally and domestically [5][6] - Europe fears alienating the US, especially with ongoing concerns about Ukraine, trade wars, and the presence of American troops in Europe [7] - Europe worries that US involvement in the Middle East will divert American resources from Europe, forcing Europe to act alone [9][10] NATO Implications - Discussions at the upcoming NATO summit will likely focus on how the Middle East situation impacts Europe [8] - A key consideration is the potential weakening of Russia if Iran is weakened, due to the drone supply relationship [9]
Trump says he doesn't want to fight #iran #politics
Bloomberg Television· 2025-06-20 19:13
It's possible that you're going to have to fight for them not to have nuclear. I don't want to fight either. I'm not looking to fight.But if it's a choice between fighting and them having a nuclear weapon, you have to you have to do what you have to do. Maybe we won't have to fight. Don't forget, we haven't been fighting.I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final. I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, you know, because things change. I mean, especially with war. Things ...
President Trump sets a two week deadline for decision on Iran strike
CNBC Television· 2025-06-20 13:44
Let's get to Israel Iran tensions and the White House still awaiting word about what the president is thinking on this matter about doing. Megan Cassell is in Washington with the latest. Megan, what do you hear.Hey, good morning guys. So, the biggest headline here is the President Trump saying yesterday that he'll decide within two weeks whether or not the US military will join Israel in its attacks against Iran. And I'll say guys, the president regularly sets these twoe deadlines for something to happen.he ...
Trump Says Iran Should Have Made a Nuclear Deal Earlier | WSJ News
WSJ News· 2025-06-18 15:35
Geopolitical Stance on Iran - The US government official neither confirms nor denies the possibility of striking Iranian nuclear facilities [1] - The US government official suggests Iran is facing significant challenges and expresses a willingness to negotiate, questioning why negotiations didn't occur sooner to avoid "death and destruction" [1] - The US government official indicates that previous attempts at negotiation with Iran failed at the last minute, leading to consequences [2] - The US government official states that it's "very late" for Iran to be talking now [3] Potential Threats and Future Actions - The US government official emphasizes the unacceptability of a hostile country, particularly Iran, possessing nuclear weapons capable of causing widespread destruction [5][6] - The US government official suggests that the coming week will be significant, potentially involving actions related to Iran [5] - The US government official acknowledges progress has been made but refrains from declaring victory, highlighting the complexities and potential negative outcomes of war [4] Views on Iranian People - The US government official expresses compassion towards the Iranian people, describing them as "incredible," "smart," and "energetic," particularly those from New York and Washington [3][4]
President Trump says he is still weighing a U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear sites
CNBC Television· 2025-06-18 14:55
That's some equipment. I'll tell you what. Look at that.That's some beautiful equipment. That's. There's nothing like America.Have a good time, Mr. . >> Mr. . President.Have you given answer questions about whether you are moving closer. You believe the U.S. Is moving closer to striking Iranian nuclear facilities. Where's your mindset on that.>> I can't say that. Right. You don't seriously think I'm going to answer that question.Will you strike the Iranian nuclear component. And what time exactly, sir. Sir, ...
Gen. Wesley Clark: I'd strongly encourage the U.S. not to simply bomb Iran's Fordo nuclear facility
CNBC Television· 2025-06-18 12:40
Reports say President Trump is considering a potential US military strike on Iran after he posted yesterday demanding Iran's unconditional surrender. Joining us right now is retired four-star Army General Wesley Clark who served as NATO Supreme Allied Commander for Europe. He's the chairman and CEO of Wesley K. Clark, an associates consulting firm. And and and sir, thank you for being with us today. General Clark, h how do you read all of the signs that we've all been trying to get our arms around and figur ...
Israel sees Iran conflict as an existential question, says The Atlantic Council CEO Fred Kempe
CNBC Television· 2025-06-17 18:52
Geopolitical Crisis & International Relations - The G7's effectiveness is questioned due to the president's early departure during a geopolitical crisis [2][3] - The US signals to Iran that it must either accept a deal to prevent nuclear weapon development or face potential military action from Israel and the US [4][5] - US officials estimate Iran is days away from assembling the fissile material needed for a nuclear bomb, but months away from delivering a weapon [8] - Israel views preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons as an existential matter, while the US, though not seeing it as existential, is committed to preventing Iran from obtaining such weapons [9] - The US and Israel are closely aligned regarding Iran [10] US Foreign Policy & Power Dynamics - The president's early departure from the G7 is partly a power play, demonstrating his focus on urgent matters like Iran [11][12] - Trade is a lower priority for the US president compared to the Iran situation [12][13] - The US president prioritizes the Iran issue as an urgent matter [13] Military & Security - The Fordo nuclear installation is under consideration for potential military action by the US, requiring B2 bombers with 30,000-pound bombs [5] - Iran's defenses and proxies are weakened, making them unable to successfully strike Israel due to Israel's strong defenses [7]
Trump Says He Wants ‘a Real End’ to Israel-Iran Conflict
WSJ News· 2025-06-17 15:13
We're not looking for a ceasefire. I didn't say I was looking for a ceasefire. We were looking for better than a ceasefire. What specifically is better than a ceasefire.What are you looking for here. An a real end, not a ceasefire. And then so something that will be permanent.Yeah. Or or uh giving up entirely. Is that okay too.Are you close there. Is are you possible. Is that possible in the next 24 hours.Certainly possible. We'll come down so hard if they do anything to our people. We'll come down so hard ...