Political Interference & Distraction - The analysis suggests that Donald Trump is attempting to distract from the Epstein investigation by pointing fingers in multiple directions [1] - The report mentions concerns that the government, with the Department of Justice, may engage in nefarious activities to support false narratives [8] - The document indicates a concern that taxpayer money is being wasted on "fool's errands" [8] Election Integrity & Gerrymandering - The report highlights the undisputed interference of Russia in the 2016 election [3] - The analysis points out the issue of extreme gerrymandering in Texas and other states, potentially leading to a one-party state [14][16] - The document mentions efforts to deny a quorum in Texas to prevent a "complete ripoff against political democracy" [18] - The report notes that Texas is dismembering and dismantling a majority Hispanic district, potentially signaling the end of the Voting Rights Act [23] Republican Party Division - The analysis suggests a division within the Republican party regarding the release of the Epstein files [11] - The report mentions that some California Republicans are upset about mid-decade redistricting, understanding they may be next on the "chopping block" [25] Justice Department Concerns - The document expresses concern over the loyalty of Justice Department appointees to Donald Trump rather than the Constitution [13][14] - The Senate confirmed Janine Piro as a top federal prosecutor for DC, who is described as an election denier [12][13]

Russian Interference in 2016 Election - The intelligence community assessment concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, aiming to harm Hillary Clinton and help Donald Trump [3][7] - The assessment did not include any judgment on whether Russian influence operations impacted the election outcome [5] - The assessment did not include any reference to collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, focusing instead on Russian actions [6] - Subsequent reviews, including a bipartisan Senate Select Committee review, endorsed the assessment's conclusions [7] The Steele Dossier - The Steele Dossier played no role in the intelligence assessment's findings or conclusions [2] - A short summary of the Steele Dossier was included as an annex to the assessment document at the insistence of the FBI [2] Current Administration's Actions - The Trump administration, including DNI Gabbard and CI Director Radcliffe, has been accused of mischaracterizing the assessment's conclusions [4] - Referrals have been made to the Justice Department accusing members of the Obama administration of lying about the assessment [9][10] - The Justice Department is reportedly considering these referrals, potentially forming a strike force to investigate [12][13] Concerns and Rebuttals - There are concerns that Trump loyalists in key positions could attempt to punish individuals regardless of the evidence [15] - Former intelligence officials stand by the assessment and deny any conspiracy [14][16] - The current situation is seen as potentially giving Putin cover and impacting intelligence community professionals [17][18]

Note the date. Here the FBI is organizing an investigation into “Trump’s Russia connections” on THE VERY SAME DAY, July 28 2016, that Hillary Clinton approved “a proposal to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.” https://t.co/NSKdZeXRbQGeorge Papadopoulos (@GeorgePapa19):DEVELOPING: Newly declassified Strzok texts detail open “counter intelligence” investigations BEFORE crossfire hurricane https://t.co/2Pvs1IreFB ...

Welcome back. Joining me now is Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Senator Graham, welcome back to Meet the Press.>> Thank you. >> Thank you for being back. So, let's start with the Epstein files.Let me ask you the question I've asked everyone. You've just heard my conversations. Do you think that the Jeffrey Epstein files should be released in full, Senator.>> Yeah, I like what the speaker said. But I'm I'm on board with Speaker Johnson to release as much as you can, protecting victims th ...

RT Shawn Ryan (@ShawnRyan762)"I just have to stress this point. This was attempted against Donald Trump when he won the 2016 election, when the Russiagate predicate came out about social media interference... When the CIA came out and said there was Russian interference on US social media and there were Russian bots and trolls, and our team and Sputnik were supporting Trump, they tried to get Congress to not certify the election result on the basis of Russian interference in the election."@MikeBenzCyber ...

brutal to watch, not even the FBI or CIA believed this bullshit as these assholes were citing them to spew thisL A R R Y (@LarryOConnor):"Nobody ever said 'the Russians hacked the election!'"Except, of course, they ALL said "the Russians hacked the election" 👇 https://t.co/w50F9lQN9i ...

The UK government didn’t breach voters’ rights by failing to investigate alleged Russian interference in elections, Europe’s top human rights court ruled, rejecting a legal challenge brought by three former lawmakers https://t.co/EDP936TABO ...