Governance by smart contractWhat DAOs mean for trust and coordination.Read more 👇https://t.co/QvJ2tT2wcC ...

COMMENT: The smart contract enables BUIDL and VBILL holders to exchange their tokenized assets for RLUSD 24/7, expanding access to stable on-chain transfers and DeFi strategies.BSCN (@BSCNews):RIPPLE PARTNERS WITH SECURITIZE TO ENABLE RLUSD SMART CONTRACT FUNCTIONALITY FOR BLACKROCK AND VANECK TOKENIZED FUNDS- @Ripple and @Securitize have announced a new smart contract integration that allows holders of BlackRock’s BUIDL and VanEck’s VBILL tokenized treasury funds to https://t.co/XM6W7m0xuo ...

Partnerships and Integrations - Ripple 与 Securitize 合作，为 BlackRock 的 BUIDL 和 VanEck 的 VBILL 代币化基金启用 RLUSD 智能合约功能 [1][5] - Securitize 将 RLUSD 集成到 XRP Ledger (XRPL) 中，进一步扩大 XRPL 生态系统和 Ripple 企业区块链解决方案的效用 [4] RLUSD Features and Adoption - RLUSD 旨在供机构使用，以 1:1 的比例由高质量的流动资产支持，接受严格的储备管理和第三方证明，确保稳定性和监管清晰度 [3] - RLUSD 自 2024 年底推出以来，在 DeFi 平台、跨境支付和流动性池中的市值已超过 7 亿美元 [3] Tokenized Asset Management - Securitize 管理着超过 40 亿美元的代币化资产，将此次集成视为机构级代币化产品实现可编程流动性和实时结算的突破 [4] - BlackRock 和 VanEck 等领先资产管理公司发行的代币化基金获得了更大的灵活性和合规性，为数字资产经济带来了更多的机构采用 [5] Smart Contract Functionality - 智能合约使 BUIDL 和 VBILL 持有者可以 24/7 全天候将其代币化资产兑换为 RLUSD，从而扩大了对稳定的链上转移和 DeFi 策略的访问 [2] - RLUSD for BUIDL 现已上线，VBILL 支持将在未来几天内推出 [2] Timeline - 该集成于 2025 年 9 月 23 日公布，标志着 RLUSD 首次嵌入 Securitize 的代币化平台 [2]

🚨JUST IN: @RIPPLE PARTNERS WITH SECURITIZE TO ENABLE RLUSD SMART CONTRACT FUNCTIONALITY FOR BLACKROCK'S BUIDL AND VANECK'S VBILL TOKENIZED FUNDS ...

L2 Technology & Security - Base is presented as a model Ethereum L2, designed to improve user experience while leveraging Ethereum's security [1] - Base is categorized as non-custodial under L2beat's Stage 1 definition, ensuring users retain control over their funds [1] - Ethereum L1 smart contract logic guarantees user fund safety, even in scenarios where the L2 shuts down or operator censorship occurs [1] Industry Perspective - Vitalik Buterin's statement highlights the importance of decentralized security in L2 solutions [1] - The discussion addresses misconceptions about L2beat's role, emphasizing its function beyond mere compliance [1]

Core Insights - Anatoly Yakovenko, co-founder of Solana Labs, is among the wealthiest individuals in the cryptocurrency sector, with his wealth primarily derived from his holdings in SOL and equity in Solana Labs [1][5][7] Company Overview - Solana Labs was founded in 2018 by Yakovenko, Raj Gokal, and Greg Fitzgerald, aiming to create a more efficient blockchain platform that could overcome Ethereum's performance limitations [4][7] - The company raised $20 million in its Series A funding round in 2020 and $314 million in a private token sale in 2021, although specific ownership details remain undisclosed due to its private status [6] Wealth and Holdings - Yakovenko's net worth is largely tied to his SOL holdings, with an estimated 136,000 SOL valued at nearly $33 million as of September 19 [5] - His equity stake in Solana Labs is estimated to be between 1-5%, with a possibility of retaining a larger founder share of 10-25% [6] Market Dynamics - The price of SOL has seen significant increases since April, driven by expectations of ETF approvals, which could further elevate the cryptocurrency's value [2][7] - The approval of spot SOL ETFs is anticipated to attract substantial capital inflows, similar to the $100 billion worth of BTC acquired by major funds since the launch of U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in 2024 [9] Investment Activities - Yakovenko is also an active angel investor, supporting various startups both within and outside the Solana ecosystem, including companies like Ellipsis Labs and Blockcast [8]

Core Insights - The integration of emerging technologies such as blockchain and the Internet of Things (IoT) with Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is transforming digital marketing strategies, enhancing brand visibility and credibility [1][14] - The fusion of these technologies presents both opportunities and challenges for companies aiming to leverage GEO for improved marketing outcomes [14] Blockchain and GEO Optimization - Blockchain enhances content credibility by providing a trust ecosystem, which increases user trust in brands when content is verified through blockchain [3][4] - The immutable nature of blockchain ensures data authenticity, allowing companies to record content creation processes and sources, thus improving the reliability of information used by AI models [4][11] - Blockchain can combat misinformation and plagiarism by establishing a transparent content traceability system, ensuring original creators are identified and verified [4][5] IoT and GEO Optimization - IoT provides contextual data that drives content innovation, enabling companies to understand user behavior and preferences more accurately [6][10] - The integration of IoT data allows for precise content targeting, enhancing user engagement and experience through tailored marketing efforts [10][12] Opportunities from Technology Integration - The combination of blockchain and IoT significantly enhances GEO effectiveness, allowing AI models to deliver more relevant and valuable information to users, thereby increasing brand exposure [7][9] - New marketing models can emerge from this integration, utilizing blockchain's trust mechanisms and IoT's data to create personalized marketing campaigns [8][9] Challenges of Technology Integration - Companies face technical barriers, including the need for skilled personnel and the high costs associated with implementing blockchain and IoT technologies [11][12] - Data privacy and security concerns arise from the extensive user data collected by IoT devices, necessitating robust privacy protection measures [12][14] - The lack of standardized protocols for integrating blockchain and IoT with GEO optimization can lead to compatibility issues and hinder effective implementation [13][14]

Core Viewpoint - The payment solutions for Web3 projects are centered around decentralization, trustlessness, and native asset circulation, leveraging blockchain technology for direct value transfer between users while ensuring transaction transparency and security through smart contracts [1]. Comparison Dimensions - Traditional payments rely on centralized institutions (e.g., banks, payment gateways) as intermediaries, requiring user authorization for fund processing, while Web3 payments utilize blockchain consensus mechanisms (e.g., PoW/PoS) for transaction validation without intermediaries [3]. - Traditional payments involve fiat currencies or platform equivalents, whereas Web3 payments utilize cryptocurrencies (e.g., ETH, USDT, native tokens) [3]. - Settlement in traditional payments can take T+1 to T+3 days with potential cross-border fees (1%-3%), while Web3 payments offer real-time settlement post-block confirmation, typically within minutes, with fees determined by the blockchain (e.g., Ethereum gas fees) [3]. - Traditional payment systems require bank card binding and real-name authentication (KYC), resulting in lower privacy, while Web3 allows interaction through wallet addresses without real-name requirements, although some scenarios may still require compliance with KYC [3]. - Traditional payments have fixed payment logic, while Web3 enables programmable payments through smart contracts for conditional payments, profit sharing, and automatic refunds [3]. Payment Mechanisms - Users can pay directly with supported cryptocurrencies (e.g., ETH, BTC, SOL) through blockchain wallets (e.g., MetaMask, Trust Wallet), with transaction records stored on-chain, ensuring complete decentralization [4]. - Stablecoins (e.g., USDT, USDC) pegged to fiat currencies are used as payment mediums, suitable for e-commerce and subscription services where price stability is essential [5]. - Users can directly purchase cryptocurrencies (e.g., USDT, ETH) with fiat currencies (e.g., USD, EUR) through compliant fiat exchange services, addressing the "lack of cryptocurrency" issue for users [6]. - Smart contracts can define payment rules (e.g., "automatic rewards upon task completion," "automatic deductions upon subscription expiration"), enabling automated processes without human intervention [7]. Key Considerations - Web3 payment solutions focus on blockchain-native assets (cryptocurrencies/stablecoins) for direct value transfer from users to projects, with developers needing to select appropriate payment mediums based on project types (e.g., NFT trading, DeFi services, Web3 games) [8]. - User experience (ease of wallet connection), compliance requirements (KYC/AML), and security measures (contract audits) are critical factors for developers [8]. - For scenarios with a high proportion of novice users, integrating fiat on-ramp solutions (e.g., MoonPay) can lower entry barriers, while high-value transactions necessitate enhanced smart contract audits and risk controls [8]. - The ultimate goal is to establish a trustless, efficient, and globally accessible payment ecosystem [8]. Asset Types - Main chain currencies include Ethereum (ETH), Bitcoin (BTC), Solana (SOL), and Polygon (MATIC), used for paying on-chain interaction fees (e.g., gas fees) or as universal transaction mediums [9]. - Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies pegged to fiat currencies (e.g., USDT, USDC, DAI), providing relative price stability (1 USDT ≈ 1 USD) to mitigate price volatility risks in transactions [9]. - Project native tokens are exclusive tokens issued by Web3 projects (e.g., Uniswap's UNI, Axie Infinity's AXS), used for ecosystem incentives (e.g., transaction fee discounts, governance voting) [9]. Payment Integration - Wallet connections can be established using libraries like Web3.js, Ethers.js (Ethereum ecosystem), or Solana Web3.js, allowing user authorization and transaction signing [9]. - Key points include handling gas fees (typically paid by users in the payment currency) and monitoring transaction confirmation status through TxHash [9]. - Decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms can facilitate low-cost, real-time cross-border transfers, replacing traditional SWIFT remittances [9]. Compliance and Security - Anti-money laundering (AML) and KYC regulations may require Web3 projects to verify user identities for large transactions (e.g., over $10,000) or high-risk users [9]. - Tax implications may arise from cryptocurrency transactions, necessitating user self-reporting of capital gains [9]. - Security risks include loss or theft of private keys, vulnerabilities in smart contracts, and potential scams through phishing websites [9].

RT Evoq Finance ⚡ (@Evoq_Finance)Urgent AnnouncementIt is with deep regret that we share this unfortunate news with our community. While we have not yet identified the exact cause, Evoq’s contract appears to have been hacked for unknown reasons.1. Please do not deposit any assets into wallet addresses that have supplied to Evoq until further notice.,2. If you have any tokens approved for the Evoq contract at, 0xF9C74A65B04C73B911879DB0131616C556A626bE, please revoke them immediately using the link below: ht ...

RT Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io (@EliBenSasson)Why Cairo *will* overcome Solidity with time.An erroneous claim folks make against Cairo, the first 100% STARK-friendly smart contract lanuage goes like this: There are way more Solidity developers than Cairo developers, and way more Dev tools for Solidity, and this gap will only widen.But this logic is flawed. According to it, there would never be any new programming language that's the new thing. Pascal, Basic, C, C++, Rust, Python, are all languages that in ...