RT Youssef (@0xYoussef_)In the pursuit of transparency, public blockchains built a “glass cage”, trapping the very users they were meant to set free.By broadcasting transactions to a permanent digital ledger, these chains enable targeted censorship, allowing third parties to monitor, flag, and block specific users.@Zcash restores the original cypherpunk vision through a Layer-1 blockchain designed to function as "encrypted money," seamlessly integrating Bitcoin’s fixed supply with end-to-end privacy via zer ...

Epstein Files Release & Transparency - The DOJ released heavily redacted Epstein files, facing criticism for slow and incomplete disclosure despite legal requirements [1][2] - The released files contained previously public information, offering limited new insights into Epstein's connections [2][12] - A photo of President Trump with unidentified females was temporarily removed from the DOJ website, sparking controversy [3][4] - The DOJ stated the photo was removed due to potential victim concerns and later restored without redaction after review [5][7] - Lawmakers are considering action against Attorney General Pam Bondi for not fully releasing the documents [8][9] Legal & Political Implications - The release is mandated by the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act, requiring classified documents to be posted within 30 days [7][8] - Congressman Ro Connor and Republican Thomas Massie are considering inherent contempt against Pam Bondi for non-compliance [7][9] - The DOJ claims to believe in equal justice and will bring charges against those involved in trafficking and exploitation [10] - The Trump administration defends its actions, citing victim protection and legal privileges as reasons for redactions [4][5] - Concerns are raised about the DOJ's transparency, with accusations of being forced into compliance and not fully adhering to the law [18][20]

Epstein Files Transparency Act Concerns - The Epstein Files Transparency Act is facing criticism due to redactions and missing files, raising concerns about transparency [1] - Victims of Epstein are seeking the release of all information to clear their names, particularly a 60-count indictment and an 82-page memo [1] - Some lawmakers are considering actions like impeachment or prosecution for those obstructing justice in the release of the files [1] DOJ Transparency and Accountability - Concerns are raised about the trustworthiness of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Attorney General in handling the Epstein case [1] - Questions arise regarding potential cover-ups and lack of straightforwardness in the release of documents [1] - Lawmakers are considering introducing articles of impeachment against Pam Bondi [2] Document Release and Legal Privileges - The DOJ's review of documents is ongoing, with redactions for victim protection deemed appropriate [3] - The assertion of privileges, such as work product privilege and attorney-client privilege, is being used to withhold information, including prosecution memos and draft indictments [4][5][6] - The client in attorney-client privilege is questioned, with concerns that it may be serving President Trump rather than the public [6] Concerns Regarding Full Disclosure - Todd Blanch's commitment to releasing all documents, including those with Donald Trump's name, is questioned [8] - There are concerns about deliberate choices being made to avoid full transparency and explanation to the American people [9] - The House oversight Democrats are working closely with victims to identify missing files and ensure accountability [2]

Government Transparency & Legal Compliance - The Trump administration is facing criticism for the incomplete release of the Epstein files, potentially violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act [1][4][5] - At least 16 files have disappeared from the DOJ's Epstein web page, including a photograph of Donald Trump [1][2] - The Justice Department had a legal obligation to release the full files, with exceptions only for victim identification and child sexual abuse materials [4] - Congressman Ro Connor suggested impeachment is an option for those obstructing justice regarding the Epstein files release [9][10] - The justification provided for redactions in the released files was deemed unsatisfactory, with concerns about the volume of redactions without explanation [18][19] Political Implications & Reactions - Some Republicans privately express frustration with Donald Trump's handling of the Epstein files issue, fearing it harms the party [7] - There is speculation that the Epstein fight may have contributed to some Republican colleagues leaving Congress [13][14] - Vice President JD Vance questioned the US government's interest in keeping Epstein's clients secret [5] - Congressman Massie highlighted Vance's question, suggesting a lack of transparency [5] Allegations & Suspicions - Allegations exist that Donald Trump knew about underage girls being trafficked from Mara Lago by Jeffrey Epstein [17] - The refusal to fully release the Epstein files raises questions about why Donald Trump is allegedly covering up information [8][16][20]

RT Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie)CompareLanguage of Epstein Files Transparency Act directing DOJ to provide internal communications regarding their decisionsVersusDOJ letter to Congress asserting privilege to omit materials related to decisions, because they weren’t specified by lawTHEY ARE FLAUNTING LAW https://t.co/O8ydW5XOnq ...

Tonight, questions for the Department of Justice around their initial release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. More than a dozen photos that were available on the DOJ site Friday have disappeared without explanation, including a photo of President Donald Trump, one of the few examples of Trump appearing in the documents release. NBC News has asked DOJ why the files were deleted and have not heard back.It comes as the Department of Justice released never-beforeseen grand jury testimony, including from a witness ...

Let's bring in Lisa Phillips, Jeffrey Epstein survivor and host of the From Now On podcast. So Lisa, welcome. Um, what is your reaction to the first batch of materials released by the DOJ.Is it what you expected. >> Um, it's not what I expected. There the survivors, we uh supported uh Connor and Massie to come out to DC on numerous occasions.Um, we're doing all the work that we can and we just feel like the Epstein Transparency Act was a failure. Uh, it didn't comply with legislation. It failed in our book. ...

Compliance & Transparency - The DOJ is accused of not fully complying with the law regarding the release of Epstein files, despite bipartisan pressure [2][3] - Concerns are raised about heavy redactions in released documents, with Democrats warning they will use all available tools to ensure 100% compliance [5][14] - The DOJ's initial approach involved lowering expectations before releasing documents, leading to skepticism about their transparency [3][4] - The released files are not easily searchable, hindering public access to information [18][23][24] - The search functionality on the DOJ website is reported to be flawed, with searches for key terms like "Trump" and "Epstein" yielding minimal results [25][27][28] Legal & Political Implications - The Trump administration is questioned regarding its honesty and compliance with the law, particularly in comparison to its enforcement of laws on others [10] - The DOJ's actions are seen as potentially setting up a legal defense in case they are taken to court for non-compliance with the Epstein Transparency Act [12][13] - Congress members express dissatisfaction with the level of transparency and plan to take action to ensure all documents are released and redactions are justified [19][34][35] - The DOJ is accused of violating the law by not releasing all files and presenting them in a way that is not easily searchable [31][32] - There are concerns that the DOJ is selectively releasing files to protect certain individuals and cast aspersions on political enemies [74] Content of Released Files - The released documents include grand jury materials, photos, court documents, videos, and audio tapes [3][6] - Some of the released material includes documents already in the public record, such as court documents and testimony from Ghislaine Maxwell [32][33] - Photos of Bill Clinton with Epstein have been released, prompting a statement from Clinton's spokesperson denying any wrongdoing [47][48][49][64] - There are reports of politically exposed people and government officials' names appearing in the files, but some faces and names are redacted, raising questions about the consistency and legality of the redactions [68][69][87] - The total amount of files that the DOJ likely has in their possession is estimated to be 300 gigabytes of data, with only about 10% released so far [59][60]

I have two great guests joining me here to kick off the show. Andrew Weissman is the former general counsel at the FBI. Julie K.Brown is an investigative reporter for the Miami Herald, responsible for breaking the Epstein story wide open all the way back in 2018. There are no two people I'd rather be talking to at the start of the show tonight. I'm so grateful to to both of you.I Andrew, let me just start with you. I I know you've been pouring through these documents, the the ones that have been released, t ...

Investigation Overview - The release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein has occurred, revealing photos of prominent figures like Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, Richard Branson, and Mick Jagger [2][3] - A significant portion of the released material is redacted, raising concerns among members of Congress regarding the reasons for these redactions and whether they comply with the law [5][6] - The Department of Justice (DOJ) faces scrutiny over the completeness and timeliness of the document release, with accusations of non-compliance with congressional mandates [11][12] Congressional Actions - The House Oversight Committee postponed a deposition related to the Epstein case to early January [8] - Republicans on the House Oversight Committee still want Bill and Hillary Clinton to be deposed [9][10] - Members of Congress are questioning whether the DOJ is fully complying with the law regarding the release of Epstein-related documents [11][13] Transparency Concerns - Concerns are raised about the lack of transparency from the DOJ regarding the redactions in the released documents [14] - There are calls for Todd Blanch or Pam Bondi to provide a timeline for the full release of information and explanations for the redactions [14] - Some lawmakers believe the DOJ is not being fully transparent with the Epstein files [10][15]