Legal & Political Landscape - A judge issued a new nationwide block against Trump's order seeking to end birthright citizenship [1] - The block is meant to comply with the Supreme Court's opinion [1]

Legal & Political - A judge issued a new nationwide block against Trump's order seeking to end birthright citizenship [1] - The block is meant to comply with the Supreme Court's opinion [1]

Legal Challenges - Immigrant-rights groups and Democratic-led states are challenging President Trump's limits on birthright citizenship [1] - Initial legal victories were upended by a Supreme Court decision, leading to strategy changes [1] Political Implications - The challenge to birthright citizenship limits has significant political implications [1]

But there is still a mom somewhere. And I remember going into the hospital to have my first baby and you have a thousand and1 concerns. And I was lucky enough as a US citizen who had her baby in 2016 that one of my concerns was not is my baby going to be stateless because I live in a country where the government has decided that this no longer applies at arch and. ...

The Justice Department told a judge that the government won’t apply Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship to affected immigrants before July 27, when the Supreme Court’s 30-day pause on the directive expires https://t.co/nETxVL9gbp ...

A judge overseeing a challenge to Donald Trump’s restrictions on automatic birthright citizenship asked the US government to confirm it won’t seek to deport impacted children during the Supreme Court’s 30-day pause on the directive https://t.co/rv5spsnBUn ...

The fate of birthright citizenship in America is still up in the air. But judges’ power to block the president’s agenda has been curtailed https://t.co/mSOeG0zY3e ...

Legal & Judicial Analysis - The Supreme Court's ruling on birthright citizenship cases is criticized for potentially creating a two-tiered legal system across the country [9] - The Supreme Court's decision is seen as limiting the power of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions against unconstitutional actions [5][14] - The strategy involves pursuing class action lawsuits to challenge the government's position on birthright citizenship [6] - A proposal is made to establish a three-judge court to handle nationwide injunctions, aiming for fair-minded judges and fast-track appeals to the Supreme Court [8] Political Implications - The decision is perceived by some as an attempt to appease Donald Trump and undermine the power of equity in the courts [15] - Concerns are raised about the potential for rights to be taken away in states with right-wing Republican Attorneys General [11] - The administration is accused of avoiding the merits of the birthright citizenship case and attempting to rewrite the history of the 2020 election [4][7][22] - The firing of federal prosecutors who worked on the January 6th investigations is criticized as part of a "gangster state administration" [21] Historical Context - Birthright citizenship has been established in America since 1868 [7] - Historically, judges have only been impeached for bribery, income tax evasion, kickbacks, and political corruption, not for their opinions [18] - Donald Trump lost the 2020 election by more than 7 million votes (306 to 232 in the electoral college) [22]

Yesterday's Supreme Court decision was a huge win for President Trump, not just regarding his efforts to end automatic birthright citizenship, but in concentrating more power into the presidency. The 63 ruling from the conservative supermajority supreme court limited the ability of lower courts to issue issue nationwide injunctions. One of the key tools that the judicial branch had in its checks and balances on an executive branch that they believe is exceeding its lawful authority.Trump herald heralded the ...