RT dewmap (@separ8)The “What is spam?” debate is the exact same psychological pattern we saw in the “What is a woman?” discourse.Confusion elevated into a virtue, uncertainty marketed as intelligence, and basic definitions suddenly treated as controversial.It’s the same mechanism, just wrapped in a Bitcoin skin.Core didn’t just drift technically.They turned conceptual fog into a badge of sophistication. And they’ve managed to convince wide-eyed new developers that this fog represents some kind of higher phi ...

YupDogeDesigner (@cb_doge):Remember that 𝕏 was the only platform that refused the secret censorship deal the EU offered while other platforms accepted it. https://t.co/ejFEI4dn5L ...

TrueMario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal):🚨🇪🇺 THE EU DOESN’T JUST WANT TO CENSOR EUROPE… THEY WANT TO CONTROL WHAT YOU SAY, NO MATTER WHERE YOU LIVEThe European Union isn’t satisfied with silencing speech in France, Germany, or the Netherlands, now they’re trying to police global conversations through their dystopian https://t.co/Dhn24rKV1q ...

Freedom of Speech & Censorship - X Corp alleges the European Commission offered an illegal secret deal involving censorship to avoid fines, a deal X Corp claims to have rejected [1] - X Corp asserts the EU imposed a "crazy fine" not only on the platform but also personally on Elon Musk [1] - X Corp believes restricting freedom of speech is a sign of "the bad guys" [1] EU Criticism & Sovereignty - X Corp expresses a negative view of the EU, describing it as a "bureaucratic monster" and a "bureaucracy slowly smothering Europe to death" [1] - X Corp advocates for the abolition of the EU and the return of sovereignty to individual countries [1] - X Corp suggests the people of Europe should withdraw from the EU to regain their sovereignty [1] - X Corp proposes that the leader of the EU should be elected by the people, not appointed by a committee [1] Potential Consequences - X Corp warns that without freedom of speech, the West will fall [1] - X Corp invokes the "Streisand Effect," implying the EU's actions will have unintended consequences [1]

RT Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger)Europe’s €140M fine on X isn’t censorship, it claims. But it is. Europe is pursuing the same censorship-by-proxy strategy used in the US from 2020 - 22. The reason is that free speech on X, particularly around mass migration, has exposed Europe’s civilizational suicide. https://t.co/WSq6MEB9KG ...

Surefire way to figure out who the bad guys are is by looking who wants to restrict freedom of speechCamus (@newstart_2024):Elon Musk just dropped the most important litmus test for freedom you’ll hear all year:“You can tell the good side from the bad side by who wants to restrict freedom of speech. The side that censors? That’s the Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini playbook. Censorship + big government = https://t.co/UfOvvOEzws ...

RT Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers (@UnderSecPD)The DSA is a cynical "censorship tariff" on American tech companies, designed to suppress speech and extract funds through anklebiting fines. The EC claims today's levy is about bluechecks – @elonmusk dares apportion them to users that European bureaucrats dislike – algorithms, and ads. In reality, a strange civilizational death drive stalks Europe. It makes misguided leaders dismantle their own nuclear power plants, deluge their own cities with hosti ...

RT Erik Dale 🇳🇴 (@EuroDale)NO ONE can claim in good faith that the EU champions freedom & democracy anymore.This censorship demand? Bureaucratic tyranny we only know about because X published the letter instead of quietly complying like the other platforms did.#FreeEurope from Brussels' chokehold 🇪🇺🚫 ...

The timeline of EU censorshipDogeDesigner (@cb_doge):How the EU has targeted Elon Musk and 𝕏 over the years:→ June 2023: The EU audited 𝕏’s safety systems and flagged weaknesses in handling hate speech and disinformation.→ October 2023: The EU issued a warning letter accusing 𝕏 of spreading misinformation during the Israel https://t.co/nYF5y3DrG3 ...

💯Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger):You say it's not about censorship ("content moderation") but it is. You want to censor who gets verified. And you want X to give government-picked "researchers" special access to data so they can demand censorship. The Twitter Files revealed your censorship-by-proxy scam. ...