Legal and Ethical Concerns Regarding Military Actions - Questions persist regarding the legal basis for 22 strikes, raising concerns about adherence to the law [3][4][11] - The legality, intended use, and handling of survivors in these operations are under scrutiny [19] - Concerns exist about potential war crimes and the need for complete information to make a determination [9][10] Government Oversight and Transparency - Frustration exists within Congress regarding the information provided by the administration about the strikes [22] - There are reports that JAG officers (法律专家) were not present to explain the legal rationale behind the strikes [22] - The role of the intelligence committee in overseeing these operations is being questioned [18][21][24] - The need for transparency and public access to evidence, such as the video of the second strike, is emphasized [10] Strategic Implications and Policy - The strategic value of the 22 strikes is questioned, particularly in relation to the stated goal of stemming drug flow [11][12] - Concerns are raised about the consistency of the president's policies, citing the pardon of a Honduran drug trafficker [13] - The potential weaponization of the Department of Justice is a concern [16] Political Dynamics - Republican colleagues initially expressed concerns about the strikes but later changed their stance after watching a video [17] - There are differing views on whether the intelligence committee adequately addressed concerns about the strikes [21][24] - A congressman's past engagement with the Maduro government is contrasted with the current US military approach [25]

The question at hand is actually can the president of the United States unilaterally de declare criminal cartel drug organizations as foreign terrorist threats and therefore have the authority to use the armed forces to strike them. That is the question on the table when it comes to the two survivors hit 40 or 50 minutes later. Obviously they weren't trying to flip the boat. Obviously they couldn't defend themselves.Obviously, there's no radio. Uh it was a termination of all aboard strike. But back off that ...

The Trump administration is not backing down on its strategy of lethal but legally questionable strikes on suspected drug trafficking vessels, even amid all the scrutiny surrounding the double tap strike on a boat back in September. With some lawmakers still wanting more clarification and answers from the Pentagon yesterday, the Defense Department announced it carried out another lethal strike on a suspected vessel in the Eastern Pacific, killing four so-called narot terrorists on board. Like all the other ...

Allegations of Wrongdoing and Misconduct - The report focuses on allegations against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, including ordering a second strike on shipwrecked individuals [3][8] - Hegseth is accused of using a private signal chat for sensitive military plans, potentially compromising DoD information [11][12] - Allegations of past misconduct, including accusations of abuse and sexual assault, are highlighted [17] Controversial Boat Strike Incident - The core issue is a drone strike that killed individuals described as drug traffickers, but questions arise about the justification for a second strike on survivors [2][3] - Lawmakers who viewed the full video expressed concerns, describing the victims as shipwrecked and incapacitated [6] - Congressman Smith stated that the individuals were sitting on a capsized boat for 45 minutes to an hour before the second strike [20] - The justification for the strike, that the survivors could return to the fight or that cocaine was still under the boat, is questioned [21][22] Political and Public Scrutiny - The White House is perceived as trying to shift blame for the incident to Navy Admiral Bradley [9] - Republican Senator Tillis stated that the buck has to stop with the Secretary of Defense [9] - There are calls for the video of the strike and the legal justification for such strikes to be made public [23][24] - Congressman Smith believes Hegseth should testify before Congress and the American people to justify his actions [25]

[Music] How do you get a pardon from President Trump. Turns out a nice letter will help. That is what the former president of Honduras and convicted drug drug trafficker did.Writing quote, "Your excellency, just as you, President Trump, I have I have suffered political persecution, targeted by the Biden Harris administration, not for any wrongdoing, but for political reasons." Joining us, Axios White House reporter Mark Caputo. This is your scoop. Uh what exactly did the Honduran president say in this lette ...

So, it goes without saying that Donald Trump's entire pretext for everything that's happening in the Caribbean is his so-called war on narco terrorists. It is the pretext for the extrajudicial strikes on alleged drug boats. Extrajudicial according to Rand Paul, who's been uh upset about them since they started happening.And yet Donald Trump's pardon power has now extended to make perfectly clear to everyone in this country and around the world that he doesn't actually care about combating drug trafficking. ...

Allegations of Unlawful Military Action - The report suggests a potential unlawful second strike on survivors, conflicting with official statements and raising questions about adherence to the law of war [8][10] - The White House's explanation appears inconsistent with initial reports and Pete Heg's statements, potentially implicating Admiral Bradley [3][11] - The legality of the initial strike is questioned, as designating an organization as a terrorist group does not automatically justify lethal targeting under international law [18][19] - Concerns are raised about military personnel potentially receiving unlawful orders, referencing the Department of Defense Law of War manual's example of firing on shipwrecked individuals [23][24] Discrepancies in Official Narrative - The claim of 11 people on the boat is inconsistent with typical drug smuggling operations, which prioritize cargo space and security with fewer individuals [13][14] - The assertion that the boat carried fentanyl, a drug primarily sourced outside South America, contradicts known facts about fentanyl trafficking [15][16] - The administration's narrative deviates from facts, potentially indicating an unlawful operation [17] Calls for Investigation and Transparency - The report advocates for a United States Congress inquiry involving various parties, including the Secretary of Defense, SEAL team leader, and Southcom commander [6] - The military is urged to provide legal justification and evidence for the operation to ensure troops are confident in the lawfulness of their missions [21][22]

Joining me now is the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Virginia Democrat Mark Warner. Senator, I want to begin with this reporting that the military conducted a second strike on what the administration claims was a drug carrying boat from Venezuela after the initial strike failed to kill all on board. That's according to a US official and a source familiar with the action.What is your reaction to this reporting. >> My reaction is why are we waited 3 months to get this information. Uh, I've r ...

Drug lord El Chapo's son pleads guilty in US drug trafficking case https://t.co/442Lkc7vhf ...

All right, joining us now, former assistant US attorney Sean P. Murphy, who previously worked in the transnational organized crime section at the US Attorney's Office District of Puerto Rico, former Pennsylvania Congresswoman Susan Wild, national security correspondent for NPR, Greg Meyer, and former Secretary of the Air Force, and current senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, Frank Kendall. Um, Greg, I I guess I'll start with you on this.That disconnect, I think, is really jarring. On the one ...