Core Viewpoint - The management of Jiaoda Onlly (交大昂立) has accused five former executives of illegal insurance purchases and refunds, leading to significant financial implications for the company [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against Former Executives - The company purchased a total of 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.54 million USD) in group annuity insurance from Tianan Life in October 2016 and paid 12.84 million yuan (approximately 1.8 million USD) in insurance premiums to Pacific Life from January to June 2018, with the insured being the five former executives [2]. - The five former executives refunded a total of 3.79 million yuan (approximately 0.53 million USD) from Tianan Life and 13.145 million yuan (approximately 1.83 million USD) from Pacific Life, totaling 16.937 million yuan (approximately 2.36 million USD) in refunds [2]. - The company’s assistant president stated that the approval process for these insurance payments lacked necessary documentation, suggesting potential illegalities in the refund process [2]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Financial Impact - In December 2024, the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning regarding the company’s inaccurate disclosure of executive compensation in its annual reports for 2016 and 2018 [3]. - The company filed a civil lawsuit against the five former executives for damages amounting to approximately 21.04 million yuan (approximately 2.9 million USD) but later withdrew the lawsuit before the court hearing [3]. - The chairman indicated that the actions of the former executives resulted in a loss of approximately 21 million yuan (approximately 2.9 million USD) to the company, leading to a criminal report filed with the local police [3][4]. Group 3: Business Operations and Client Relationships - The company disclosed that it had significant sales to Hefei Sanzi Yang, totaling 5.1575 million yuan (approximately 0.72 million USD) and 3.1611 million yuan (approximately 0.44 million USD) in the second and third quarters of 2024, respectively, making it the largest customer during that period [5]. - However, by the fourth quarter of 2024, Hefei Sanzi Yang was no longer listed among the top ten customers, and the CEO of Sanzi Yang resigned from the board of Jiaoda Onlly [5][6]. - The chairman mentioned that the company has identified better business opportunities, leading to the cessation of collaboration with Sanzi Yang [6].

为应对数字时代日益严峻的个人信息保护挑战，特别是社会高度关注的人脸识别技术应用安全，7月9 日，"个人信息保护法规政策宣讲活动"在广州举行。本次活动由广东省委网信办指导，广州市委网信 办、广东省网络数据安全与个人信息保护协会、中国电子技术标准化研究院联合主办，吸引了来自机关 单位、科研院所、企业及社会组织的百余位代表参与。 宣讲会上，有关专家对《个人信息保护合规审计管理办法》《人脸识别技术应用安全管理办法》进行详 细解读与现场答疑。 广东省网络数据安全与个人信息保护协会负责人表示，希望携手更多的企业、机构、平台、专家，一同 为广东打造"全国领先、衔接国际"的个人信息保护高地提供支撑，一起赋能广东经济社会高质量发展， 助力优化国际营商、旅居与就业环境。 有与会代表指出，此次宣讲会通过案例分析、条文对照的方式，让企业对个人信息保护工作的底层逻辑 和操作路径有了更透彻的理解，为后续扎实推进各项工作提供了极具价值的行动指南。也有与会代表表 示，会后将以法规政策为指引，切实筑牢数据安全防线。 此次宣讲活动由广州市信息安全测评中心、广州市网络安全产业促进会、广州互联网协会协办。 采写：南都研究员 李伟锋 实习生 朱恺熙 ...

Group 1 - The company establishes an information disclosure management system to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, protecting the rights of shareholders and other stakeholders [1][2][3] - Information disclosure is a continuous responsibility of the company, requiring timely, truthful, and complete reporting to all investors without selective disclosure [2][3][4] - Major events that could significantly impact the company's securities must be disclosed immediately, including asset changes, management changes, and legal issues [4][5][6] Group 2 - The company must disclose information regarding changes in its name, registered capital, and other significant corporate changes promptly [5][6] - The company is required to monitor unusual trading activities and media reports that may affect its securities, ensuring timely communication of relevant information [6][7] - The responsibilities of the board of directors and senior management include ensuring the accuracy and completeness of disclosed information and adhering to disclosure timelines [15][16][17] Group 3 - The company must provide annual, semi-annual, and quarterly reports within specified timeframes, ensuring that financial statements are audited by qualified firms [9][10][11] - In case of significant performance changes, the company must issue performance forecasts and disclose any abnormal trading activities related to its securities [9][10][11] - The company must maintain a record of compliance with disclosure responsibilities and ensure that all relevant personnel are trained on these obligations [19][20][21]

中央网信办举报中心7月9日公布的数据显示，2025年6月，中央网信办举报中心指导全国各级网信举报 工作部门、主要网站平台受理网民举报色情、赌博、侵权、谣言等违法和不良信息1849.6万件，环比增 长1.1%、同比下降7.2%。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The actual controller of Yongjin Co., Ltd., Cao Peifeng, is under criminal investigation for insider trading and has been granted bail pending trial, which may not affect the company's daily operations or financial status [2][3][4]. Company Overview - Yongjin Co., Ltd. was established in 2003 and is headquartered in Lanxi City, Zhejiang Province. The company primarily focuses on cold-rolled stainless steel and has diversified investments in various sectors, including titanium alloy materials and new energy battery shell materials [3]. - As of the end of Q1 2025, Cao Peifeng and her husband, former chairman Yu Jiqun, collectively hold approximately 43% of the company's shares [3]. Insider Trading Case - Cao Peifeng is facing criminal charges due to significant insider trading activities related to Yongjin Co., Ltd. The Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau had previously imposed administrative penalties on her, totaling over 6 million yuan [2][6]. - The insider trading involved two transactions during sensitive periods, resulting in a profit of approximately 550,000 yuan and a loss of about 670,000 yuan [6][7]. - The total penalties imposed on Cao Peifeng amounted to approximately 640 million yuan, including the confiscation of illegal gains and fines [7]. Market Impact - Following the announcement of the investigation, Yongjin Co., Ltd.'s stock price fell by 2.39%, closing at 17.55 yuan per share, with a market capitalization of approximately 6.4 billion yuan [8].

深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司 （2025年7月） 第一章 总则 深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司 信息披露管理制度 第一条 为规范深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）信息披 露行为，加强信息披露事务管理，保护投资者合法权益，根据《中华人民共和国 公司法》（以下简称《公司法》）、《中华人民共和国证券法》《上市公司信息披露 管理办法》《深圳证券交易所创业板股票上市规则》（以下简称《上市规则》）等 法律、行政法规、部门规章、规范性文件及《深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司章程》 （以下简称《公司章程》）的有关规定，结合公司的实际，制定本制度。 第二条 本制度所称信息披露，是当发生或即将发生可能对公司股票及其 衍生品种的交易价格产生较大影响或者对投资决策有较大影响的信息或事项时， 根据法律、法规、规范性文件的规定及时将相关信息的公告文稿和相关备查文件 报送深圳证券交易所登记，并在深圳证券交易所的网站和符合中国证监会规定条 件的媒体发布。 第三条 本制度所称信息披露义务人，是指公司及其董事、高级管理人员、 股东、实际控制人以及法律、行政法规、中国证监会和深圳证券交易所规定的其 他承担信息披露义务的主体。 第二章 信息披露的基 ...

深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司 第一章 总则 第一条 为进一步加强深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）重 大信息内部报告工作，保证公司内部重大信息的快速传递、归集和有效管理，及 时、准确、全面、完整地披露信息，维护投资者的合法权益，根据《中华人民共 和国公司法》《中华人民共和国证券法》《上市公司信息披露管理办法》《深圳 证券交易所创业板股票上市规则》《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 2 号——创业板上市公司规范运作》以及《深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司章程》 （以 下简称《公司章程》）等有关规定，结合公司实际，制定本制度。 第二条 公司重大信息内部报告制度是指当出现、发生或即将发生可能对公 司股票及其衍生品种交易价格产生较大影响的情形或事件时，按照本制度规定负 有报告义务的单位、部门、人员，应当在第一时间将相关信息向公司责任领导、 董事会秘书进行报告的制度。 第三条 本制度适用于公司各部门及子公司。 第二章 重大信息报告义务人 深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司 重大信息内部报告制度 第四条 本制度所称报告义务人为： （一）公司及其子公司的董事、监事、高级管理人员； （二）公司各部门负责人、子公司负责人； （ ...

深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司 内幕信息知情人登记管理制度 深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司 第一章 总则 第一条 为进一步规范深圳市优优绿能股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）内幕 信息管理行为，加强公司内幕信息保密工作，维护公司信息披露的公开、公平、 公正原则，保护广大投资者的合法权益，根据《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下 简称《公司法》）、《中华人民共和国证券法》（以下简称《证券法》）、《深圳证券 交易所创业板股票上市规则》 《上市公司监管指引第 5 （以下简称《上市规则》）、 号——上市公司内幕信息知情人登记管理制度》等有关法律法规以及《深圳市优 优绿能股份有限公司章程》 （以下简称《公司章程》）规定，结合公司的实际情况， 特制定本制度。 第二条 董事会是公司内幕信息的管理机构，董事会秘书为公司内幕信息保 密工作负责人，董事会办公室为公司内幕信息的监督、管理、登记、披露及备案 的日常工作部门。 （三）公司订立重要合同、提供重大担保或者从事关联交易，可能对公司的 资产、负债、权益和经营成果产生重要影响； （四）公司发生重大债务和未能清偿到期重大债务的违约情况； （五）公司发生重大亏损或者重大损失； （六）公司生产经营的 ...

Market Overview - The A-share market saw all three major indices rise in the morning but experienced a significant drop in the afternoon, with a total trading volume of 1.53 trillion yuan, an increase of 528 billion yuan compared to the previous trading day [1] - Over 3,300 stocks in the market declined, with market focus on sectors such as diversified finance, Kimi concept, banking, medical services, and cultural media [1] Stock Performance - A total of 53 stocks hit the daily limit up, with 18 stocks on consecutive limit up days, and 30 stocks failed to close at the limit, resulting in a limit up rate of 64% (excluding ST and delisted stocks) [3] - Notable stocks included: - Huayin Power: 7 consecutive limit ups - Huaguang Huaneng: 5 consecutive limit ups - New Zhonggang: 4 consecutive limit ups - Jin'an Guoji: 5 consecutive limit ups in the PCB sector [3][4] Key Stocks and Their Metrics - **Huayin Power (600744)**: Price at 8.11 yuan, up 10.04%, with a trading volume of 17.747 million and a turnover rate of 10.98% [4] - **Jin'an Guoji (002636)**: Price at 15.09 yuan, up 9.99%, with a trading volume of 1.08 million and a turnover rate of 0.99% [4] - **Forest Packaging (605500)**: Price at 12.07 yuan, up 10.03%, with a trading volume of 4.35 million and a turnover rate of 8.90% [4] - **Huaguang Huaneng (600475)**: Price at 16.73 yuan, up 9.99%, with a trading volume of 9.03 million and a turnover rate of 5.96% [4] Institutional Trading - The top three net buying stocks on the daily leaderboard were: - Kuaijingtong: 318 million yuan net buy - Tongguan Copper Foil: 200 million yuan net buy - Dazhihui: 197 million yuan net buy [6] - The top three net selling stocks were: - Yihua New Materials: 119 million yuan net sell - Rifa Precision: 114 million yuan net sell - Zhongyi Technology: 89.41 million yuan net sell [7] Sector Highlights - **Kuaijingtong**: Recently entered the Japanese market, enhancing its position in the cross-border e-commerce sector [9][10] - **Tongguan Copper Foil**: Notable for its production capabilities in the PCB copper foil sector, with a new project recently launched [18] - **Dazhihui**: Engaged in significant asset restructuring, with a focus on financial information services [17] Trading Dynamics - The trading dynamics showed a significant interest from institutional investors, with notable net purchases in stocks like Dazhihui and Kuaijingtong, while some stocks like Wangzi New Materials faced net selling [25][27]

在后营销时代，信息流通的方式和内容相较于传统营销阶段发生了显著变化。从信息失真到渠道的多样化，这些变化都深刻影 响着企业的营销策略，也让消费者的行为模式发生了一些变化。下面就让我们来具体剖析下这其中的一些细节。 三、企业信任度下降 由于虚假信息和夸大概念的增多，目前企业的信任度下降在市场上已经是个大风向。消费者对于品牌的信任度下降，导致营销 信息的传播门槛明显提升，用户不再轻易相信一些推广内容。如何重塑品牌与用户之间的信任感，已经成为又一重要议题。 一、虚假信息多 相较于传统媒体时代，虚假信息的传播速度和范围远超以往。社交媒体、短视频平台等新兴渠道的兴起，使得不实信息能够被 迅速扩散，甚至引发公众恐慌或误导消费决策。对于传播出去的内容，企业还是需要保证其真实度，以免影响到品牌信誉。 二、夸大概念多 为了博取流量，很多品牌在做宣传时都会刻意夸大一些概念，从而为品牌打造独特的卖点。但这种夸大概念本身也是种虚假宣 传，再加上用户与品牌之间的认知差距，也就导致很多用户会感觉购买的商品货不对板。这种营销方式不仅误导消费者，还可 能触犯相关法律法规，导致企业面临法律风险。 四、用户更强调自身认知 在后营销时代，面对繁杂的 ...