Core Viewpoint - The UN Secretary-General António Guterres expressed deep shock over the escalating military conflict between Israel and Iran, calling for immediate de-escalation and ceasefire [1] Group 1 - Guterres emphasized that any new military intervention could have severe consequences, affecting not only the parties involved but also threatening regional and global peace and security [1] - He condemned the unnecessary loss of life, civilian casualties, and destruction of homes and critical infrastructure during the conflict [1] - Guterres reiterated that diplomatic means are the only viable solution to address Iran's nuclear program and regional security issues [1] Group 2 - The Secretary-General reaffirmed that the UN Charter is the cornerstone of maintaining international peace and urged all member states to fully comply with the Charter and international law, including international humanitarian law [1]

Core Viewpoint - The EU, along with the foreign ministers of the UK, France, and Germany, expressed concerns over the escalating tensions in the Middle East and emphasized the need for restraint to avoid further escalation [1] Group 1 - The EU and the foreign ministers of the UK, France, and Germany held a phone call with the Iranian foreign minister [1] - All parties reiterated their willingness to contribute to a diplomatic solution regarding the Iranian nuclear issue [1] - There was a collective call for all parties to return to diplomatic negotiations to reach a consensus solution [1]

Group 1 - Vietnam faces a critical deadline on July 9, 2025, where failure to reach an agreement with the U.S. could result in a 46% tariff on key exports such as textiles and electronics [1] - The negotiations are influenced by U.S. efforts to disrupt Chinese supply chains, compelling Vietnam to sign agreements that would reduce tariffs to 20%-25% in exchange for blocking Chinese transshipment [1][3] - In 2024, 12% of Vietnam's $123.5 billion trade surplus with the U.S. was derived from goods that were transshipped from China, indicating a significant reliance on this trade route [1] Group 2 - The U.S. has implemented strict measures, including requiring Vietnam's customs system to connect to the U.S. traceability database, which tracks sensitive goods from raw materials to finished products [3] - Vietnam has imposed anti-dumping duties of 19.38%-27.83% on Chinese steel, effectively severing the transshipment channel [3] - New regulations require that at least 55% of the value of products must be added locally in Vietnam to qualify for lower tariffs, posing challenges for manufacturers who primarily rely on Chinese components [3][5] Group 3 - Vietnam is attempting to balance its economic ties with China while enhancing its relationship with the U.S., a strategy referred to as "bamboo diplomacy" [5] - Following the signing of agreements, the U.S. unexpectedly raised tariffs on Vietnamese steel to 50%, leading to significant order cancellations for local aluminum companies [5] - The textile industry in Vietnam is heavily dependent on Chinese materials, with 60% of fabrics sourced from China, making it difficult to comply with new regulations [5] Group 4 - Chinese companies are adapting by establishing production facilities in Vietnam while retaining core technology in China, indicating a shift in the supply chain dynamics [7] - The construction of the China-Laos railway and the development of the Lancang-Mekong economic belt are efforts to bypass U.S. maritime blockades [8] - Southeast Asian countries are responding to U.S. pressures by tightening customs regulations, impacting companies like Apple, which plans to relocate a significant portion of its production out of Vietnam [8] Group 5 - The overall impact of these trade tensions is detrimental to all parties involved, with Vietnamese manufacturers struggling to maintain profitability under the new tariff regime [10] - U.S. companies, including Nike and Apple, are warning that increased costs will ultimately be borne by American consumers [10] - The complexities of global supply chains mean that tariffs may not effectively block goods, as companies find ways to navigate through technology and market strategies [12]

Core Points - The conversation between UAE President Mohammed and Russian President Putin focused on the strategic partnership between the two countries and the serious impact of the latest situation in the Middle East on regional and global security [1] - Both leaders discussed efforts to contain the situation and end the escalation, emphasizing the importance of restraint and dialogue to avoid further threats to security and stability [1] - They expressed support for all efforts aimed at achieving a diplomatic solution [1]

Group 1 - The core point of the article revolves around China's rejection of Russia's proposal to increase oil supply through Kazakhstan, which surprised many in the energy sector given the historically smooth energy cooperation between China and Russia [1][3][5] - The rejection is attributed to increased transportation costs of 15-20% and significant pipeline construction expenses due to the longer route from Russia to China via Kazakhstan [7][8] - China prioritizes energy security and prefers direct pipelines from the China-Russia border for better control and efficiency, reflecting a strategic approach to energy diplomacy [10][30] Group 2 - Following the rejection of the oil proposal, China Nuclear Group announced plans to build Kazakhstan's second nuclear power plant, leveraging Kazakhstan's vast uranium reserves [12][14] - Kazakhstan's energy landscape is shifting, as the country has relied heavily on coal for electricity, which is expected to face a significant power shortage by 2025 [14][16] - The nuclear project represents a more valuable opportunity for Kazakhstan compared to transit fees from oil, highlighting China's comprehensive capabilities in nuclear energy [33][34] Group 3 - The diplomatic engagement between China and Kazakhstan is characterized by high-level receptions and a desire for cooperation, contrasting with Mongolia's missed opportunities due to indecision [21][23] - Kazakhstan's strategy of balancing relations with both Russia and China demonstrates a pragmatic approach to foreign policy, as seen in its decision to allow both countries to participate in nuclear projects [26][28] - China's energy diplomacy is evolving towards a more nuanced and pragmatic approach, focusing on specific project economics, safety, and controllability rather than binary choices [30][34]

据《以色列时报》18日报道，伊朗常驻联合国代表团针对特朗普关于"伊朗主动接触华盛顿"的说法表 示："从未有任何伊朗官员在白宫门前俯首乞怜。""伊朗不会在胁迫下谈判，不会在胁迫下接受和 平。"代表团强调，"伊朗将以威慑应对威胁，以对等手段回应一切敌对行动。"(环球时报) ...

伊朗驻联合国代表团：伊朗将以反威胁应对任何威胁，以对等措施应对任何行动。 ...

他周二在Truth Social上写道，"我们确切地知道所谓的'最高领袖'藏在哪里"，"我们不会把他干掉，至少 现在不会……我们的耐心正在消耗殆尽。" 伊朗最高领袖阿亚图拉·阿里·哈梅内伊（Ayatollah Ali Khamenei）周三在一份由电视主播宣读的声明中 称，伊朗不会接受美国总统特朗普要求的"无条件投降"。 这是自上周五以色列开始轰炸伊朗后，哈梅内伊首次公开发声——他在伊朗国家电视台网站播出的讲话 中强调，伊斯兰共和国不会屈服于外部强加的和平或战争。 "了解伊朗、伊朗民族及其历史的智者，绝不会用威胁性语言与这个民族对话，因为伊朗民族不会投 降，"他表示，"美国人应当知道，任何美军军事干预都必将伴随不可挽回的损失。" 周三，在以色列战机连夜轰炸德黑兰后，数千民众逃离这座城市。以色列军方宣布，50架以军战机连夜 袭击德黑兰约20个目标，包括导弹原材料生产地、零部件及制造系统站点。 一位知情人士透露，特朗普及其团队正在评估一系列方案，其中涉及与以色列联合打击伊朗核设施。 伊朗驻日内瓦联合国大使阿里·巴雷尼（Ali Bahreini）则表示，伊方已向华盛顿传达：若美国直接参与 冲突，伊方将进行报复。他还 ...

Group 1: G7 Summit Outcomes - The G7 summit concluded without a joint communiqué, highlighting significant disagreements among leaders on various issues [1] - Canadian Prime Minister Carney acknowledged the efforts to find common solutions despite the differences [1] Group 2: Trade Negotiations - The U.S. government's "reciprocal tariffs" negotiation window is set to close on July 9, with no significant progress made during the summit [3] - Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the current trade negotiations, stating that a fair agreement has not been proposed by the EU [3] - Japan's Prime Minister Ishiba noted ongoing cognitive differences in trade discussions with the U.S., but both sides agreed to continue negotiations [3] Group 3: Bilateral Meetings - Carney and Trump held a one-hour meeting discussing trade pressures and priorities, with both leaders acknowledging differing views on trade policy [4] - The U.S. and UK signed the "Economic Prosperity Agreement," which primarily addresses tariff reductions on automotive and aerospace products, while steel and pharmaceutical tariffs remain unresolved [5] Group 4: Regional Conflicts and Relations - The summit addressed the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, calling for a resolution and emphasizing the need for energy market stability [6] - Carney's meeting with Indian Prime Minister Modi marked a diplomatic recovery following tensions over a recent incident involving a Sikh leader in Canada [6] - The EU is set to sign a defense procurement agreement with Canada, indicating strengthening ties between the two regions [6]

德国外交部长：我们已经向伊朗明确表示，坐到谈判桌前永远不嫌太晚。 ...