Group 1 - Artificial intelligence (AI) is a crucial driving force behind the new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation, becoming a strategic high ground in global technological competition [1][2] - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of AI development, focusing on integrating AI with the real economy and enhancing comprehensive strength in AI [1][4] - There are existing gaps in foundational theories and key technologies in China's AI sector, necessitating efforts to advance innovation and regulatory frameworks [4][5] Group 2 - The governance of AI must be law-based to ensure its healthy development, aligning with national strategic needs and balancing high-quality development with high-level security [2][3] - The governance framework should adapt to the rapid evolution of AI technologies, requiring flexible regulatory approaches that can accommodate uncertainties and complexities [7][8] - Establishing a legal system for AI involves comprehensive updates across the legal framework, addressing specific areas such as data, algorithms, and sector-specific applications [12][13] Group 3 - The need for a dynamic regulatory system is highlighted, focusing on continuous monitoring and post-incident recovery to manage the risks associated with AI technologies [9][10] - The legal responsibilities of AI products and services must be clearly defined, considering the current technological landscape and ensuring transparency and accountability [11][12] - The development of AI legislation is urgent, with a focus on creating adaptable laws that can respond to the fast-paced changes in technology and its applications [13]

《指导意见》全面总结人民法院审判执行工作以及资本市场监管执法工作，从总体要求、投资者保护、 市场参与人规范、司法行政协同及组织实施保障等方面，提出了严格公正执法司法、保障资本市场改革 发展的23条意见。 三是强化司法行政协同，凝聚发展合力。推进完善纠纷多元化解机制，推动"抓前端、治未病"走深走 实。强化会商和信息共享工作机制，做好司法程序与行政监管程序的衔接，全面提升司法审判执行与行 政监管处罚工作质效。 2025年5月15日，最高人民法院、中国证监会联合发布《关于严格公正执法司法服务保障资本市场高质 量发展的指导意见》（下称《指导意见》）。《指导意见》是司法保障资本市场改革发展的一部纲领性 文件，有针对性地完善司法政策和裁判规则，创新工作机制，全面提升审判监管质效，是资本市场法治 建设的一项重要成果，有助于充分发挥人民法院职能作用，强化司法与行政协同，全方位助推资本市场 高质量发展。 《指导意见》主要内容包括四个方面：一是聚焦投资者保护，站稳人民立场。依法打击欺诈发行和财务 信息披露造假，完善虚假陈述民事赔偿责任制度。常态化开展证券纠纷代表人诉讼，便利投资者依法维 护自身合法权益，降低投资者维权成本。 二是 ...

此外，证监会还披露了2024年执法总体情况并以案释法，公布了包括全国首例投资者保护机构公开提名 独立董事案、全国首单操纵市场领域投资者保护机构"支持诉讼+损失测算"案、全国首单"示范调解+仲 裁确认"机制化解私募基金群体性纠纷案等年度十大投资者保护典型案例。 "法治是资本市场的根基，发挥着固根本、稳预期、利长远的作用，是投资者合法权益保护的重要支 撑。"证监会副主席陈华平在证监会2025年"5·15全国投资者保护宣传日"活动上表示，要优化完善投资 者保护制度机制，筑牢投资者保护的制度根基。 筑牢投资者保护制度根基，证监会发布多项投资者保护规则 投资者保护再迎新规，司法保障资本市场改革发展的纲领性文件、上市公司募集资金监管规则以及证券 纠纷调解等多项规则密集出台。5月15日，证监会在北京举办2025年"5·15全国投资者保护宣传日"活 动。当日，证监会、交易所及行业协会集中发布了包括上述规则在内的多项投资者保护规则与举措。 中国证券业协会修订发布《证券纠纷调解规则》，进一步完善证券行业纠纷多元化解机制，畅通非诉讼 纠纷解决渠道，推动各方积极、充分地参与纠纷调解工作，切实维护投资者合法权益。 陈华平说，为进一步提 ...

Core Points - The "Private Economy Promotion Law" was passed on April 30 and will take effect on May 20, marking a significant milestone in the development of the private economy in China [1] - The law reflects the high importance placed by the Party and the state on the private economy, providing strong legal support for the stable development and protection of the legitimate rights of private enterprises [1][2] - Since the 18th National Congress, the private economy has become a vital force in promoting growth, innovation, employment, and improving people's livelihoods, contributing significantly to China's modernization and high-quality development [2] Summary by Sections Legal Framework - The "Private Economy Promotion Law" consists of 9 chapters and 78 articles, establishing mechanisms for fair competition, investment promotion, technological innovation, and rights protection [3] - It emphasizes equal treatment and protection of the private economy, marking the first time the legal status of the private economy is explicitly defined [3] Implementation and Support - Local governments and departments are urged to effectively implement the law, ensuring comprehensive understanding and adherence to its requirements [4] - Specific measures include breaking down market entry barriers, supporting private enterprises in bidding processes, and enhancing financial support for small and micro enterprises [4] Societal Impact - The law is expected to foster a stronger social consensus, enhancing the role of the private economy in technological innovation and the modern industrial system [5] - It aims to empower private enterprises to seize opportunities and contribute to the realization of the Chinese Dream [5]

笔者将以"跟价机制"为切入点，讨论如何平衡平台自治与法治原则。 某平台"邀请"入驻品牌方参加其**节比价活动，承诺全网最低价。如其他竞争平台旗舰店的同款产品价 格更低，该系统会自动调价至与更低价一致，差价由品牌方补贴。但列入比价的旗舰店可能并不是品牌 方开设的，品牌方根本无法控制其售价。通常平台只给参加或不参加两个选项；看似参加活动可获流量 支持，实则不参加活动流量严重削减；甚至存在过"618"或"双11"大促期间商家无法关闭跟价功能的条 款1，一时间在社会上引起热议。 早期的平台仅提供交易撮合服务，但伴随规模扩张，平台通过用户协议、算法规则和流量分配机制，间 接掌控了定价权，甚至成为交易市场的管理者与规则制定者。平台自治权的迅速扩张与具有滞后性的法 律规制产生冲突，一方面，平台通过格式条款（如"强制跟价协议"）要求商家同步调整价格，借此赢得 竞争优势。另一方面，此类规则常以牺牲商家自主定价权为代价，涉嫌不正当竞争，甚至对某些头部平 台来说，亦涉嫌滥用市场支配地位，对商户经营带来了新的挑战，甚至困境。平台规则对消费者是普惠 政策，还是使商户与消费者都落入权益受损的困境？笔者将以"跟价机制"为切入点，讨论如何平 ...

Core Viewpoint - The joint release of the "Guiding Opinions" by the Supreme People's Court and the China Securities Regulatory Commission aims to enhance judicial policies and rules, innovate working mechanisms, and strengthen investor protection in the capital market [1][2]. Group 1: Judicial and Regulatory Framework - The "Guiding Opinions" serve as a comprehensive document to improve judicial policies and adjudication rules, enhancing the quality and efficiency of judicial and regulatory oversight in the capital market [1]. - It summarizes the actual work of court enforcement and capital market regulatory enforcement, proposing 23 specific opinions across five areas: overall requirements, investor protection, market participant norms, judicial-administrative collaboration, and organizational implementation [1][2]. Group 2: Investor Protection Measures - Key measures include legally combating fraudulent issuance and financial information disclosure fraud, and improving the civil compensation system for false statements [2]. - The initiative promotes regular representative litigation for securities disputes, facilitating investors in protecting their legal rights and reducing the costs of investor rights protection [2]. Group 3: Collaborative Mechanisms - The "Guiding Opinions" emphasize the need for enhanced collaboration and information sharing between judicial and administrative processes, aiming to improve the effectiveness of judicial execution and administrative regulatory penalties [2]. - Future efforts will focus on implementing the "Guiding Opinions," solidifying the institutional foundation for judicial protection in the capital market, and optimizing the collaborative mechanisms between judicial and regulatory bodies [2].

Core Insights - WeChat has become a target for illegal activities, including account theft and the sale of stolen accounts, leading to significant financial gains for criminal groups [1][2] - A recent case in Xiangtan revealed a gang that stole over 6,000 WeChat accounts, with the leader profiting over 1.2 million yuan [1] - The case highlights the need for enhanced regulatory measures and technological defenses against such crimes [3] Group 1: Criminal Activities and Techniques - The criminal group utilized technology to exploit platform vulnerabilities, including the use of IoT cards that bypassed real-name registration requirements [1][2] - They employed a "card phone" plugin to trigger account protection features, making it difficult for original account owners to detect anomalies [2] - Stolen accounts were logged into thousands of second-hand phones, where simulated human behaviors were used to maintain account activity and evade detection [2] Group 2: Regulatory and Technological Recommendations - There is an urgent need to upgrade platform risk control mechanisms, including the introduction of anomaly detection models for login activities [2] - Social media platforms should implement stricter content review processes to combat fraudulent advertisements targeting minors [2][3] - Legal frameworks must be strengthened to clarify the criminal responsibility for account selling and enhance industry oversight [3] Group 3: Collaborative Efforts and Future Directions - A comprehensive approach involving legal, technological, and collaborative strategies is essential to combat the organized nature of these crimes [3] - Establishing a data-sharing mechanism between law enforcement and internet companies can help track and prevent criminal activities [3] - International cooperation is necessary to address cross-border cybercrime, particularly in regions with high rates of online fraud [3]

Core Points - The "Red Alley Youth Law Academy" has been officially established, focusing on integrating legal education with red culture for youth [1][2] - The academy aims to cultivate legal awareness and thinking among children through interactive and practical activities [1] - The initiative is a continuation of previous efforts by the Shangcheng District People's Procuratorate, which established the first youth law academy in the province in 2019 [1] Group 1 - The "Red Alley Youth Law Academy" leverages rich red resources to promote legal education and prevention for youth [1] - The academy has conducted over 300 legal education activities, reaching more than 30,000 individuals [1] - The curriculum includes unique activities such as "Youth Observation Group," "Mock Court Youth Discussion Hall," and "Legal Salon" [1] Group 2 - The academy has partnered with Hangzhou No. 10 Middle School and Hangzhou New Century Foreign Language School to offer weekly legal-themed classes [2] - A "Mock Micro Proposal Box" has been launched to encourage children to express their observations on social issues [2] - Some of the children's proposals will be submitted to representatives for consideration, allowing them to contribute to social governance [2]

Core Viewpoint - The construction of a legal culture in doctor-patient relationships is a long-term and challenging task that requires the joint efforts of society, leading to a more harmonious future in doctor-patient relations [1] Group 1: Legal Awareness - Legal awareness is the core of legal culture and the foundation for improving doctor-patient relationships, with a hospital's legal training increasing patients' legitimate rights protection from 50% to 70% [2] - The awakening of legal awareness allows patients to understand their rights and obligations, while healthcare workers become more cautious in their duties [2] Group 2: Institutional Framework - Institutional norms are the cornerstone of legal culture, with a rise in responsibility recognition from 40% to 65% in medical malpractice cases after relevant laws were enacted [2] - The implementation of an electronic medical record system reduced disputes related to medical records by 60%, enhancing the integrity and accuracy of medical documentation [2] Group 3: Behavioral Transformation - The establishment of medical dispute mediation committees resolved 90% of disputes within hospitals, while the introduction of professional legal consultation reduced medical disputes by 50% [3] - These changes indicate a shift from "disruptive behavior for profit" to lawful rights protection, improving the efficiency of dispute resolution [3] Group 4: Role of Judicial Institutions - Judicial institutions play a crucial role in building a legal culture in doctor-patient relationships, with a 40% increase in mediation success rates through "demonstrative judgments and media interpretation" [4] - The severe punishment of medical dispute offenders led to a 70% decrease in the recurrence of similar incidents, demonstrating the dual effect of judicial deterrence and guidance [4] Group 5: Medical Institutions' Role - Medical institutions are the main body of legal culture construction, with a compliance review mechanism reducing medical error rates by 55% [5] - The development of intelligent informed consent systems increased the completeness of medical notifications from 60% to 95%, enhancing patient engagement and reducing misunderstandings [5] Group 6: Patient Education - Patient education is a vital part of legal culture construction, with community health lectures increasing patients' willingness to protect their rights by 30% [6] - The introduction of VR systems for understanding medical dispute processes improved patients' comprehension of legal procedures by 50% [6] Group 7: Mechanism Innovation - The establishment of a "one-stop medical dispute resolution center" reduced processing time from 180 days to 30 days, with an 85% success rate in mediation [7] - This innovation provides an efficient platform for resolving disputes, reducing escalation due to delayed resolutions [7] Group 8: Technological Empowerment - The introduction of blockchain evidence storage systems improved evidence acceptance efficiency by 70% [7] - The development of an intelligent legal knowledge Q&A platform reduced patient legal consultation response time from 3 days to 2 hours, enhancing legal awareness and rights protection [7] Group 9: Conceptual Change - Conceptual change is central to legal culture construction, with role-reversal activities increasing mutual understanding between doctors and patients by 40% [8] - Linking legal training to medical ethics evaluations raised compliance rates among healthcare workers to 95% [8]

《实施方案》提出，加强执法监督，严格规范涉企行政检查、开展规范涉企执法专项行动，对标 《提升行政执法质量三年行动计划（2023—2025年）》重点任务清单，理顺执法监督工作体系，加强执 法人员培训，优化包容审慎监管模式，建设全省行政执法和执法监督一体化平台，提升行政执法规范化 水平；优化普法宣传，践行"人人都是营商环境"理念、开展"送法进企业"活动、落实"谁执法谁普法"普 法责任制和"三单两书"普法工作制度，提升法治文化建设专业化水平。 省司法厅相关负责人表示："我们将不断探索符合我省实际的法治化营商环境建设新思路、新举 措、新路径，推动全省法治化营商环境持续优化提升，为谱写陕西新篇、争做西部示范提供更加坚实的 法治保障。"（记者：苏欣雨） 5月9日，记者从省司法厅获悉：该厅近日出台《陕西省司法行政机关助力深化营商环境突破年2025 实施方案》，优化法治化营商环境，为全省高质量发展、现代化建设提供法治保障。 《实施方案》围绕制度保障、法律服务、纠纷化解、执法监督、普法宣传5个方面提出20条具体措 施。《实施方案》要求，全省各级司法行政机关围绕优化营商环境，通过完成重点领域立法、完善行政 规范性文件合法性审查机 ...