| 贵金属日评20250708:中国央行6月续增持黄金储备,特朗普政府开始对各国设定新税率 | 交易日期 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 较昨日变化 | 较上周变化 | 2025-07-01 | 2025-07-07 | 2025-07-04 | 收盘价 | 771. 30 | 777.06 | 776.10 | -5. 76 | -4. 80 | | | | | | 成交量 | 213782.00 | 190256.00 | 171739.00 | -23, 526. 00 | 18, 517. 00 | 期货活跃合约 | 持仓重 | 175040.00 | 167465.00 | 175760.00 | 720.00 | 8, 295. 00 | | | | 库存(十克) | 21456.00 | 21456.00 | 18453.00 | 0. 00 | 3,003.00 | 上海黄金 | 收盘 ...

Group 1: New Zealand and Australia Economic Outlook - Westpac Bank expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand to keep the official cash rate unchanged in July, adopting a wait-and-see approach for future rate adjustments [1] - The Reserve Bank of New Zealand may allow the market to interpret potential rate changes and will decide based on economic data released before the August monetary policy statement [1] - The Reserve Bank of New Zealand might indicate that economic activity in Q1 2025 could exceed expectations, although subsequent indicators show a slowdown in economic momentum [1] - The Reserve Bank of Australia did not cut rates in July as widely anticipated, but future rate cuts remain a possibility, contingent on upcoming inflation data [2] - The Reserve Bank of Australia stated that inflation risks have become more balanced, suggesting that while there is no immediate pressure to cut rates, it may be delayed rather than canceled [2] Group 2: Japan's Economic Challenges - Mizuho Securities analysts suggest that the Bank of Japan should maintain its current policy amid external uncertainties, particularly regarding U.S. tariffs [3] - The potential for a 25% tariff on Japanese imports by the U.S. starting August 1 adds uncertainty and could negatively impact Japan's exports and overall economic performance [3] - Mitsubishi UFJ Securities economists believe that U.S. tariffs will challenge Japan's economy, especially in exports and capital investment, prompting the government to consider broader economic stimulus measures [3] - Japan's central bank plans to slow the pace of its bond purchase reduction starting April 2026, considering market stability and participant feedback [3] Group 3: Singapore's Economic Performance - DBS Group economists indicate that Singapore's economy may avoid technical recession in Q2 2025 due to early shipments by export companies, which temporarily supported actual export growth [4] - While short-term export data appears strong due to early deliveries, long-term challenges loom for Singapore's export sectors, particularly electronics and biopharmaceutical manufacturing, due to potential U.S. tariff measures [4]

Core Viewpoint - The upcoming Japanese Senate election is creating uncertainty in the bond market, with the ruling coalition potentially losing its majority, leading to a significant sell-off in long-term Japanese government bonds [1][3]. Group 1: Election Impact on Bond Market - The yield on Japan's 30-year government bonds rose by 12.5 basis points to 3.09%, while the 40-year bond yield is nearing historical highs due to investor concerns over the ruling coalition's performance in the upcoming election [1]. - Polls indicate that the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its coalition partner Komeito may lose their majority, which could trigger expectations of more aggressive fiscal stimulus, further pushing up long-term bond yields [3][4]. - The ruling coalition needs to secure at least 50 out of 125 seats to maintain its majority, with the election focusing on economic stimulus proposals [4]. Group 2: Political and Economic Implications - If the ruling coalition loses, the new government may favor larger fiscal stimulus measures, increasing Japan's already high public debt burden [4]. - The market is likely to price in a more fluid political situation if the ruling coalition loses the Senate, which could lead to increased volatility and downward pressure on Japanese stocks [3][4]. - The Bank of Japan faces a dilemma in normalizing its monetary policy due to market volatility and election uncertainties, potentially delaying the reduction of its bond-buying program [5].

Group 1 - The market is overly optimistic about the economic outlook, ignoring the negative impacts of unprecedented high tariffs, particularly on small businesses and inflation [1] - Multiple factors, including tariffs, a weak dollar, and potential demand slowdown, are impacting the inflation outlook, with tariffs expected to drive inflation higher in the second half of the year [1] - The labor market's ability to buffer against economic recession is weaker than in any period post-pandemic, with fewer job vacancies per unemployed person compared to 2021-2022 [1] Group 2 - The U.S. fiscal policy is creating a tug-of-war effect on economic growth, with both tariffs and fiscal measures raising inflation risks [2] - Inflation-protected assets, such as TIPS, appear relatively cheap, and could benefit if market sentiment shifts towards inflation concerns [2] - The Federal Reserve's economic forecast suggests a median expectation of a 50 basis point rate cut this year, but inflation pressures may lead to fewer cuts than anticipated [2]

2025年已然过半，中国经济总体平稳运行，而这背后显然离不开更加积极财政政策的助力。 "面对国际经贸环境急剧变化，上半年宏观经济延续稳中向好态势，经济增长韧性超出普遍预期，一个重 要原因就是今年财政政策逆周期调节力度加大，发力节奏适度前置，促消费、稳投资作用凸显。"东方金 诚首席宏观分析师王青告诉第一财经。 在近些年推动经济平稳运行的宏观政策体系中，财政政策是一大支柱，今年中国首次提出实施"更加积极 的财政政策"，力度空前。上半年财政政策执行情况如何？对经济增长、民生保障等究竟起到什么作用？ 下半年财政政策如何实施、重点在哪？ 财政政策积极有力 自2008年国际金融危机以来，中国连续17年采用积极财政政策，即政府在经济增长乏力时通过增加支 出、减少税收、扩大赤字、发行政府债券、增加转移支付等手段，刺激总需求，促进经济复苏和增长的一 种宏观调控政策。 与往年有所不同的是，面对复杂的内外形势，今年的政府工作报告首次提出"更加积极的财政政策"，其中 今年财政赤字率首次提到4%左右高位，新增政府债务总规模达到11.86万亿元，比去年增加2.9万亿元， 释放了财政政策扩张加码稳经济信号。 2025.07. 08 本文字 ...

上天天基金APP搜索【777】注册即可 领500元券包 ， 优选基金10元起投！限量发放！先到先得！ 特朗普"极限施压"美联储降息的真实目的曝光。 《华尔街日报》资深央行记者Greg Ip在最新发布的文章中表示，美国总统特朗普要求美联储降息的目的是， 希望通过更低的利率来满足自己的财政优先策略。文章警告称，这种"财政主导"模式往往导致通胀、危机和经 济停滞的"危险组合"。 7月7日，美国财长贝森特表示，市场可能在将特朗普的降息观点计入价格。贝森特认为，今年剩下的时间将会 降息两次。关键不仅在于美联储主席鲍威尔，更在于整个联邦公开市场委员会。 同日， 特朗普贸易顾问纳瓦罗表示，美联储主席鲍威尔维持政策利率不变的做法正在造成严重伤害。 纳瓦罗 呼吁美联储理事会干预鲍威尔的立场。纳瓦罗还表示，鲍威尔导致收入损失和利息支出增加。 特朗普的真实目的 7月6日消息，《华尔街日报》资深央行记者Greg Ip发表文章称，特朗普近期密集要求美联储主席鲍威尔降 息，他希望通过更低的利率来满足自己的财政优先目标，为美国国会刚通过的减税法案提供更便利的融资支 持。 Greg Ip表示，特朗普正试图打破预算赤字与利率之间的传统联系。传 ...

Group 1: Core Aspects of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" - The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" is considered the most significant economic legislation during Trump's presidency, extending tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that were set to expire in 2025 [2][4] - The act primarily continues existing tax policies rather than introducing new substantial tax cuts, preventing a significant increase in personal income tax rates post-2025 [2][4] - The Republican Party traditionally advocates for tax cuts to stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and increase national income, based on the belief that lower taxes enhance corporate profitability and investment [2][4] Group 2: Fiscal Deficit and Government Debt Implications - The act is projected to add $3 trillion to $4 trillion in additional fiscal deficits over the next decade, exacerbating the already high government debt, which is expected to reach nearly $36 trillion by 2024 [6][10] - The U.S. federal government's fiscal deficit is anticipated to reach 6.6% of GDP in 2024, marking a historical high, with debt interest payments surpassing defense spending [6][9] - Economic studies suggest that the growth effects from tax cuts may not sufficiently offset the revenue losses, with estimates indicating that only about one-third of the revenue loss from tax cuts can be compensated through economic growth [5][6] Group 3: Income and Wealth Distribution Effects - The act is expected to provide $1 trillion in tax benefits to the wealthiest 1% of Americans over the next decade, while low-income individuals may suffer from reduced healthcare and government benefits [11][13] - This disparity in benefits is likely to exacerbate income and wealth inequality in the U.S., posing challenges to the political system [11][13] Group 4: Indirect Effects on China - In the short term, the act may benefit the Chinese economy by increasing U.S. demand for Chinese products as trade tensions ease, aiding China's transition from external to internal demand [14] - The act's cancellation of subsidies for renewable energy sectors may slow the development of the U.S. renewable energy industry, but its direct impact on China's electric vehicle sector is expected to be limited [14] Group 5: Broader Economic and Political Implications - The act introduces significant uncertainty regarding the sustainability of U.S. federal finances, with long-term economic growth effects remaining unclear [10][18] - The political dynamics surrounding the act's implementation and its impact on Trump's influence and authority are uncertain, as they will evolve with the economic and electoral landscape [17][18]

有色早报 研究中心有色团队 2025/07/08 铜 ： 日期 沪铜现货 升贴水 废精铜 价差 上期所 库存 沪铜 仓单 现货进口 盈利 三月进口 盈利 保税库 premium 提单 premium 伦铜 C-3M LME 库存 LME 注销仓单 2025/07/01 200 1759 81550 24773 -1085.77 219.08 30.0 48.0 116.30 91250 31975 2025/07/02 125 1917 81550 25097 -740.05 287.80 30.0 48.0 96.20 93250 31900 2025/07/03 110 1459 81550 24103 -1000.59 26.46 30.0 49.0 87.61 94325 31900 2025/07/04 105 1223 84589 22307 -974.44 138.45 30.0 52.0 95.35 95275 33950 2025/07/07 100 1001 84589 21682 -1002.36 174.64 29.0 63.0 79.80 97400 36875 变化 -5 -222 ...

机构分析认为，法案进一步提升美国未来债务压力，预计这将导致中长期长端美债利率中枢上行。 受关税方面消息影响，美国股市主要股指7日全线下跌，道琼斯工业平均指数下跌0.94%，标准普尔500 种股票指数下跌0.79%，纳斯达克综合指数下跌0.92%。 欧盟委员会发言人奥洛夫·吉尔7日表示，欧盟仍在争取于7月9日前与美国达成一项原则性的双边贸易协 议，目前欧盟与美国仍在继续接触。 吉尔说，欧盟始终致力于达成一项有利于欧盟企业、消费者和全球经济的协议。此外，欧盟也已准备好 应对所有结果的选项，包括反制清单，但暂不打算启动该程序。 新华财经北京7月8日电美国国债收益率周一（7月7日）延续涨势，10年期美债收益率涨3.36个基点，报 4.38%；2年期美债收益率涨1.46个基点，报3.89%。2年期与10年期美债利差走阔约2个基点。超长期美 债收益率涨幅超过4个基点，收益率曲线趋向陡峭。 特朗普7月4日签署"大而美"税收和支出法案，标志着这一备受争议的法案正式成为法律。 美国总统特朗普7日表示，将从8月1日起分别对来自日本、韩国等14个国家的进口产品征收25%至40% 不等的关税。特朗普在信中警告上述国家领导人称，如果想 ...

特朗普"极限施压"美联储降息的真实目的曝光。 7月6日消息，《华尔街日报》资深央行记者Greg Ip发表文章称，特朗普近期密集要求美联储主席鲍威尔降 息，他希望通过更低的利率来满足自己的财政优先目标，为美国国会刚通过的减税法案提供更便利的融资支 持。 Greg Ip表示，特朗普正试图打破预算赤字与利率之间的传统联系。传统经济学理论认为，大规模借贷会推高 利率，从而抵消减税带来的好处。但特朗普的策略是通过向美联储施压，强制降低利率来配合其财政政策目 标。 文章警告称，这种"财政主导"模式在历史上通常与阿根廷等新兴市场的弱央行相关联，往往会导致通胀、危机 和经济停滞的组合。然而，在短期内，这种模式可能会成为强有力的经济刺激手段，这也解释了美股市场在此 预期下不断创出历史新高。 《华尔街日报》资深央行记者Greg Ip在最新发布的文章中表示，美国总统特朗普要求美联储降息的目的是， 希望通过更低的利率来满足自己的财政优先策略。文章警告称，这种"财政主导"模式往往导致通胀、危机和经 济停滞的"危险组合"。 7月7日，美国财长贝森特表示，市场可能在将特朗普的降息观点计入价格。贝森特认为，今年剩下的时间将会 降息两次。关键 ...