中国发展网讯 近日，成都市锦江区一家小型科技企业仅用短短几天时间便成功获得"锦江民营发展贷"300万元资金支持，解了燃眉之急。之所以有如此成效， 得益于今年3月创新推出的全国首个民营主体专属普惠贷款产品——"锦江民营发展贷"。截至5月底，该产品已为区内118家民营企业提供信用授信，总额达 1.7亿元，以金融"活水"精准浇灌民营经济沃土。 成都世纪飞扬科技集团有限公司是"锦江民营发展贷"的受益者之一。这家专注互联网广告服务的企业，因行业回款周期延长、新业务拓展急需资金，现金流 一度告急。锦江区工作专班在走访中获悉后，立即启动融资协调机制，综合评估其良好营收纳税记录及发展前景，排除非实质性风险干扰，匹配"锦江民营 发展贷"产品，迅速为其匹配300万元授信并成功放款，同时提供差异化利率优惠，有效化解了企业短期资金困境。企业负责人感慨："这笔贷款真是及时 雨！" 事实上，锦江区的金融服务创新不止于单一产品，更致力于构建全链条、数字化服务生态：企业端：打造"锦彩企成"微信小程序，实现政策信息一键直达、 要素保障在线匹配。政府侧：建立"锦诉办"企业诉求闭环督办平台，确保企业问题"接得快、办得实"。 产品创新 破解民企融资 ...

智通财经APP获悉，中指研究院称，今年以来，当前宏观政策对楼市支持力度不断加大，核心城市市场维持修复态势，优质地块持续推出，"好房子"建设 加速，民企拿地家数和金额均有所增加，有一定补仓意愿。但整体来看，当前拿地企业仍以央国企为主，仍延续了2022年以来的趋势。从销售端来看，房 企销售额仍处于下降通道，5月销售平淡。销售端压力或将继续向投资端传导，因此，民营房企的信心实质性提升，需要销售回暖的带动。 民企拿地家数和金额均有所增加，有一定补仓意愿 分析2025年前5月拿地金额TOP100企业中民企的构成，当前积极拿地主要为两类，一类是经营稳健的大中型品牌房企，其在当年市场形势下有一定补库存 需求，近年维持一定拿地规模，如龙湖、滨江、大华；一类是区域性中小房企，抓住市场机遇拓储，如兴耀房产集团、海成集团等，成为市场新生力量。 从民企总部所在地来看，主要为浙江、四川等地的民营房企，特别是浙江，24家房企中有9家为浙江房企，浙江省民营经济发达、房地产市场韧性较强， 吸引了许多民营房企投资。 从民营房企背景来看，部分房企背靠实业背景母公司，拥有一定资金优势，也有发展房地产业务意愿和能力。如得力房产是得力集团旗下的房地产 ...

作为吸纳就业的"主力军"，民营经济为稳就业发挥了重要支撑作用。税务数据显示，截至4月底，民营 经济缴纳养老保险费的人数占全部企业职工缴费人数的79.4%，较去年同期提高0.2个百分点；缴费人数 同比增长0.9%，较全部企业平均增幅高0.2个百分点。 民营企业发展稳中向好，离不开政策呵护。为帮助广大民营经济主体轻装上阵、增强活力，近年来多项 稳企业、稳市场政策出台落地。例如，在破除准入壁垒方面，国家发改委联合有关部门发布新版市场准 入负面清单，清单进一步缩短；开展市场准入壁垒清理整治行动，集中整治半年后转为常态化推进；以 及积极推动民营企业公平参与招标投标。又如，金融管理部门制定了一系列差异化的监管政策，包括对 小微企业贷款的风险资本权重给予八五折到七五折优惠，将普惠型小微企业贷款不良率容忍度放宽至不 高于各项贷款不良率3个百分点等，提高银行支持民营企业的积极性。 民营经济是社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分，是推进中国式现代化的生力军，是高质量发展的重要基 础。国家税务总局最新数据显示，今年前四个月，全国民营经济（包括民营企业和个体工商户）纳税人 享受支持科技创新和制造业发展的主要政策减税降费及退税3518.8亿 ...

据介绍，人民法院依法惩治民营企业内部腐败犯罪，清除"蛀虫"。在燕某、孙某非国家工作人员受贿案 中，二被告人作为某控股公司董事，收受贿赂5.6亿余元，造成所在公司巨额经济损失，分别被判处有 期徒刑十四年十个月、十五年。 最高法表示，人民法院将认真贯彻落实民营经济促进法，坚持和落实"两个毫不动摇"，充分发挥审判职 能作用，以依法平等保护促进民营经济发展。 石某玉非国家工作人员受贿、职务侵占案，是依法惩治互联网企业工作人员腐败犯罪的典型案例。石某 玉作为某互联网企业工作人员，收受贿赂608万元并侵占公司财物366万元，严重侵害所在互联网企业权 益，被法院判处有期徒刑十二年。 新华社北京6月9日电（记者罗沙、冯家顺）法治是最好的营商环境。最高人民法院9日发布5件促进民营 经济发展典型刑事案例，充分发挥典型案例教育、警示、震慑作用，维护企业合法权益。 同时，人民法院依法惩治破坏市场秩序犯罪。张某剑是某工程项目工作人员，负责门岗保卫、工地进 料、施工安全等工作。他借此欺行霸市，强迫某装饰公司等多家商户从其处购买高于市场价格的水泥、 沙石等装修材料，强迫交易数额共计92万余元，被人民法院以强迫交易罪判处有期徒刑三年二个月。 ...

Core Points - The case involves two executives from a private company who were convicted of accepting bribes totaling over 560 million yuan, resulting in significant economic losses for their company [1][2][3] - The executives were sentenced to 15 years and 14 years and 10 months in prison, respectively, and were ordered to forfeit 100 million yuan in assets [2][3] - The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of protecting the rights of private enterprises and the need to combat corruption within the private sector [3] Summary by Sections Case Details - The defendants, Yan and Sun, were executives at a capital holding company and accepted bribes from a pharmaceutical company in exchange for facilitating a debt financing deal [1] - They received a total of over 560 million yuan in "business commissions" from 2014 to 2018, despite knowing the financing had significant flaws [1][2] Legal Proceedings - The Chongqing court found that the defendants' actions constituted bribery, and Yan received a lighter sentence due to his confession [2] - Both defendants appealed the initial ruling, but the higher court upheld the original sentences [2] Implications for the Industry - The Supreme Court's statement highlights the critical role of private enterprises in China's modernization and economic development [3] - The case serves as a warning that corruption in private enterprises will be treated with the same severity as in public sectors, reinforcing the legal consequences for such actions [3]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has released typical criminal cases to promote the development of the private economy, emphasizing that the economic property and legal rights of private enterprises are equally protected by law [1] - The court's actions reflect a firm stance in creating a safe and stable social environment and a fair market environment for the development of the private economy [1] - The court's commitment to recovering criminal proceeds demonstrates a clear attitude to prevent criminals from profiting from their actions and to minimize losses for affected enterprises [1] Group 2 - A case involving an employee of an internet company, who accepted bribes totaling 6.08 million yuan and illegally occupied 3.66 million yuan, highlights the issue of corruption within internet enterprises [2] - The court found the employee guilty of bribery and embezzlement, sentencing him to a total of 12 years in prison and ordering him to repay the embezzled funds [2][3] - This case serves as a typical example of the legal system's efforts to combat corruption in internet companies, which is crucial for promoting the development of new productive forces [3] Group 3 - A case involving a regional group purchasing manager who misappropriated over 4.87 million yuan for personal use underscores the risks of fund misappropriation in private enterprises [4] - The court ruled that the manager's actions constituted a crime of misappropriation of funds, sentencing her to three years in prison and ordering her to repay 4.73 million yuan [4][5] - The safety of funds is highlighted as a critical factor for the healthy development of private enterprises, with legal consequences for employees who misuse company funds [5]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has released typical criminal cases to promote the development of the private economy, emphasizing that the economic property and legitimate rights of private enterprises are equally protected by law [1] - The court's actions reflect a firm stance in creating a safe and stable social environment and a fair market environment for the development of the private economy [1] - The court's commitment to recovering criminal proceeds demonstrates a clear attitude to prevent criminals from profiting from their actions and to minimize losses for affected enterprises [1] Group 2 - Two executives conspired to receive over 560 million yuan in "business commissions" through illegal means, highlighting issues of corruption within private enterprises [2] - The defendants, Yan and Sun, utilized their positions to illegally accept bribes, with the total amount received being significant, constituting a serious crime [2] - The court's ruling sends a strong signal regarding the legal consequences of bribery in private enterprises, equating the illegal acceptance of bribes by private enterprise staff with that of state officials [3]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the resilience and adaptability of Chinese enterprises in the face of external economic pressures, highlighting their efforts to explore new markets and upgrade their operations [5][4] - It discusses the importance of having clear goals and dreams for the future, as articulated by leaders like Xi Jinping, which serve as a guiding force for the economy [4][7] - The concept of "second breath" is introduced, illustrating how industries and companies can overcome challenges and enter new phases of growth [4][6] Group 2 - The article draws a parallel between the Chinese economy and a wheel, where the spokes represent various economic provinces and sectors working together to support overall growth [7][6] - It highlights the role of both state-owned and private enterprises in driving economic progress, emphasizing the complementary nature of different economic sectors [7][8] - The need for coordinated regional development and the establishment of new mechanisms for cross-regional cooperation is underscored as essential for economic stability and growth [7][4]

公共资源交易主要是以市场化方式对公共资源进行配置，其涉及利益面广、社会关注度高。十九届中央 全面深化改革委员会第七次会议指出："深化公共资源交易平台整合共享，要坚持应进必进、统一规 范、公开透明、服务高效原则，加快推进平台交易全覆盖，完善分类统一的交易制度规则、技术标准、 数据规范，创新交易监管体制，推动公共资源阳光交易，着力提高公共资源配置效率和公平性。"党的 二十届三中全会《决定》提出："建立健全统一规范、信息共享的招标投标和政府、事业单位、国有企 业采购等公共资源交易平台体系，实现项目全流程公开管理。"这为我们推动公共资源交易提供了科学 指南、指明了前进方向。 贯彻落实党中央决策部署，要以民营经济促进法颁布实施为契机，优化民营经济发展环境，大力做好公 共资源交易工作，打造统一规范、信息共享、阳光透明的公共资源交易平台体系，进一步破除市场壁 垒、降低交易成本、提高服务质量、强化公正监管，保障民营企业平等参与公共资源交易活动，提升资 源配置效率效益，保证各类经济组织公平参与市场竞争。具体可在以下方面着力。一是严格落实《公平 竞争审查条例》规定，加强公共资源交易领域公平竞争审查，进一步破除不合理限制和隐性壁垒 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the necessity of fair competition for the robust growth of the private economy, highlighting the importance of eliminating both tangible and intangible barriers [1][2][4] - The case of Luoyang illustrates how breaking market barriers can release significant development momentum, with the number of charging stations increasing from over 1,300 in 2020 to more than 15,000 by the end of 2024, and service fees decreasing from 0.8 yuan to approximately 0.3 yuan per kilowatt-hour [1] - The introduction of the Private Economy Promotion Law aims to ensure that various economic organizations can participate fairly in market competition, addressing long-standing concerns of private enterprises [2][3] Group 2 - The market access negative list has been revised four times since its introduction in 2018, reducing the number of restricted items from 151 to 106, a decrease of about 30%, which facilitates a more active market environment [3] - Various local governments are taking actions to eliminate hidden barriers in market access, such as excessive approval conditions and lengthy processes, which are seen as obstacles to the growth of the private economy [3][4] - The private economy has made significant contributions, accounting for over half of the "new three samples" exports, indicating its vital role in the national economy [4]