省教育考试院提醒考生提前备齐备足符合要求的考试所需文具，并配合监考员做好文具检查。为保障考 生应急所需，考点备有适量考试文具，考试过程中，考生如遇文具使用异常，可向监考员申领；下一场 考试考生如需增补文具，入场前仍须接受监考员检查。 今年，我省仍实行"无声入场"。考生须主动接受智能安检门检查和"无声入场"检查，有序进入考点考 场。 考点（考试封闭区域）入口处，考生须在工作人员的引导下接受智能安检门检查。考场门口处，考生须 自觉接受金属探测器检查，无金属报警提示视为合格。考生须进行身份验证（指纹比对/人脸比对、拍 照），对三次验证未通过的，按要求拍照后入场，身份证、准考证交由监考员作进一步核验；核验无误 的，当科考试结束交还考生；仍存疑的，当科考试结束后考生到考务办公室由主考核验。因疾病或身体 原因需要带入特殊物品的，须携带由负责该考生高招体检的医疗机构打印、加盖考区招生考试机构公章 的《2025年普通高招考生体内植入特殊物品证明》。 今年我省仍会进行入场模拟演练，考生按照当地招生考试机构或考点安排，在规定时间到考点参加入场 模拟演练，确认考场位置，熟悉安检流程，确保入场着装和携带物品符合要求。自备文具须于模拟 ...

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the absurdity of school management practices that prioritize academic performance over students' basic physiological needs, such as restroom access [1][2][3] - The military-style management in schools is driven by an unhealthy obsession with升学率 (college admission rates), leading to extreme measures that compromise students' well-being [2][3] - The societal pressure from parents and the education system reinforces these practices, as high-stakes exams like 高考 (Gaokao) dominate the educational landscape, often at the expense of students' health [3][4] Group 2 - The article argues that education should focus on nurturing well-rounded individuals rather than merely producing high-scoring students, emphasizing the need for flexibility and empathy in educational practices [4] - The lack of attention to students' basic needs, such as restroom access, reflects a broader issue in the education system where students are treated as mere score-generating machines [3][4] - The discussion calls for a reevaluation of educational values, advocating for a system that promotes mental and physical health alongside academic achievement [4]

高考试题在启用前按绝密级管理，在命题、制卷、运送、保管、分发等全流程、各环节有着严格的管理标准和程序，严防泄题泄密事件发生，有效保证了试题试卷 的绝对安全。切勿轻信售卖高考试题、答案等诈骗信息。 （二）"绝密资料""命题组押题卷" 高考前，部分考试培训机构、自媒体通过网络平台发布所谓"绝密资料""绝密级预测卷"，号称有高考命题组老师参与出题，年年押中高考试题，有的还以AI大模型 押题为噱头。相关信息通过夸大宣传吸引流量，达到诱导考生和家长高价购买模拟试题、参考资料的目的。 2025年高考在即。为积极营造风清气正的全国高考网络环境，根据国家教育统一考试工作部际联席会议部署，教育部会同中央网信办、公安部 联合开展查处涉高考违法有害信息等工作。 教育部、中央网信办、公安部郑重提醒，互联网不是法外之地，有关个人和机构要为自己的言论负责，对于编造、传播网络谣言，故意扰乱公共秩序，涉嫌构成编 造、故意传播虚假信息罪和寻衅滋事罪等犯罪的，将依法受到严厉打击。相关网络平台要认真落实信息内容管理主体责任，持续加大监测处置力度，重点排查清理 造谣考前泄题、贩卖所谓"试题答案"、组织考试作弊、开展招生诈骗等涉考违法有害信息，重点整 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of creating a clean and positive online environment for the upcoming 2025 national college entrance examination in China [1] - The Ministry of Education, in collaboration with the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission and the Ministry of Public Security, is actively working to investigate and address illegal and harmful information related to the college entrance examination [1]

5月29日，记者从陕西省教育考试院获悉：为帮助广大考生和家长适应"新高考"下的招录规则，科 学合理填报志愿，陕西省"新高考"志愿填报资料系列工具书《2024年陕西省普通高等学校招生考试统计 年报》《2025年陕西省普通高等学校招生报考指南》出版。 《2025年陕西省普通高等学校招生报考指南》聚焦"新高考"改革背景下的"3+1+2"考试模式与录取 规则调整，对2025年陕西省"新高考"政策进行全面解读，系统解析"院校专业组"志愿设置、选考科目要 求、投档录取模式及规则等关键内容。为帮助广大考生适应"院校专业组"志愿填报模式，《指南》首次 公布在陕招生院校本科及高职（专科）批次招生专业的详细数据，构建起"政策—数据—实操"的完整报 考支持体系。 省教育考试院相关负责人介绍，近期还将出版《2025年普通高校在陕招生计划汇编（物理类）》 《2025年普通高校在陕招生计划汇编（历史类）》《招生考试高考特刊》等陕西省"新高考"志愿填报资 料系列工具书，为考生志愿填报与职业生涯规划有效衔接提供重要参考。（记者：吕扬） 《2024年陕西省普通高等学校招生考试统计年报》以陕西省教育考试院官方数据为基础，系统梳理 各批次院校在文 ...

Group 1 - Experts' opinions are considered important references for policy-making in China's modernization process, but not all suggestions withstand scrutiny and some may lead to serious consequences [1] - Zhang Weiying, a prominent economist, proposed the abolition of minimum wage standards in 2019, arguing that market forces should determine wages to reduce costs for businesses and increase employment opportunities [5][27] - This suggestion sparked intense debate, with critics arguing it overlooks the basic rights of workers and could lead to significant wage reductions, impacting their livelihoods [17][27] Group 2 - Lang Xianping advocated for a fairer income distribution system in 2020, highlighting China's high Gini coefficient of 0.47, which exceeds the international warning line of 0.4 [19] - He suggested policy adjustments, such as increasing taxes on high-income groups and subsidizing low-income earners, but this could undermine market incentives and innovation [19][29] - The average income distribution could lead to inefficiencies, as seen in historical examples like the Soviet Union's planned economy [21] Group 3 - He Weifang called for the abolition of the death penalty in 2021, emphasizing the sanctity of life and the irreversible risks of judicial errors [11][21] - His views faced criticism for being out of touch with public sentiment, as over 70% of respondents in a 2019 survey believed the death penalty deters serious crimes [23][31] - The Chinese government has maintained the death penalty, citing its role in crime deterrence and public safety [23][31] Group 4 - Han Han proposed reforms to the college entrance examination system in 2022, advocating for a shift towards quality education and personalized development for students [13][25] - His suggestions received mixed reactions, with concerns that abolishing the exam could exacerbate educational inequality, particularly for rural students [25][29] - The current examination system is viewed as one of the fairest selection mechanisms, providing opportunities for students from various backgrounds [25] Group 5 - Wang Xiaobo's idea of direct democracy, suggesting the elimination of representative systems, has been debated posthumously, with scholars noting the impracticality in a populous nation like China [27][33] - The Chinese government continues to uphold a representative system, emphasizing efficiency in responding to social needs [33] - The discussions surrounding these experts' suggestions highlight the need for policies that consider China's complex realities, balancing theoretical ideals with practical implications [33][35]

Group 1 - The core focus is on the importance of the new college entrance examination and ensuring its smooth implementation, emphasizing the need for comprehensive preparations and safety measures [1][2] - The new examination system is seen as a significant reform that requires a higher standard and stricter requirements in its execution [1] - The local government is committed to addressing new challenges and risks associated with the examination, highlighting the necessity for detailed work processes and targeted training [1][2] Group 2 - The examination is crucial for educational outcomes and has a direct impact on families and students, necessitating a prominent focus on preparation [2] - Key areas of focus include exam paper security, management of examination affairs, student services, and the environment surrounding examination venues [2] - There is a strong emphasis on campus safety as a political priority, with specific attention to food safety, fire safety, and emergency drills [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the significant increase in demand for "Gaokao rooms" (rooms for the National College Entrance Examination) as the exam approaches, with a notable 80% rise in bookings compared to 2023 [2][3] - The hotel industry is responding to this seasonal demand by offering specialized services for students and parents, including soundproof rooms, comfortable bedding, and nutritious breakfast options [2] - Major cities like Shenzhen and Guangzhou have seen substantial growth in Gaokao room bookings, with Shenzhen experiencing over 1.8 times growth and Guangzhou seeing a 63% increase compared to the previous year [3] Group 2 - The pricing for Gaokao rooms is typically higher than usual due to increased demand, with packages ranging from several hundred to over a thousand yuan depending on the hotel star rating and city [3] - Chain hotels dominate the Gaokao room market, accounting for nearly 50% of bookings, while high-star hotels represent over 20% of the total [3] - The most popular booking area for Gaokao rooms is Zhuhai's Gongbei Port/Fuhua Li, which saw a remarkable 4.7 times increase in bookings compared to 2023 [3]

Core Insights - The order volume for "Gaokao" accommodation has increased by 80% compared to 2023, indicating a growing trend among parents to secure lodging in advance for the upcoming exam period [1][2] Accommodation Trends - The most popular cities for "Gaokao" accommodation bookings include Beijing, Shanghai, Xi'an, Chengdu, Nanjing, Tianjin, Guangzhou, Dalian, Changsha, Wuhan, and Shenzhen [1][2] - Nearly 50% of the bookings are for chain hotels, while over 20% are for high-star hotels, reflecting a preference for standardized services and high cost-performance [1][2] Additional Services - Many hotels are offering special services for "Gaokao" students, such as free transportation, early check-in, and late check-out [1][2] - Hotels near exam venues are providing unique amenities like quiet rooms, stationery packages, energy packs, and exam preparation room packages [1][2] - Some hotels prioritize offering "quiet rooms" that are away from noisy streets, elevators, and renovation sounds to help students focus [1][2]

央视网消息：高考临近，在考生和家长紧张备考的时候，押题卷市场也是十分火热。"名师"和"AI预测"押题齐上阵，他们真的靠谱吗？AI"押 题"真的是"备考神器"吗？ 中学教师袁媛表示，这些押题卷所谓的"押中"标准非常宽泛，只要涉及相同知识点都算押中。知识点平时复习都会讲到，信这个不如信自己和 自己的老师。 高考临近 AI"押题"成备考神器？专家提示：押题卷背后 暗藏商业套路 如今，市场上试题种类繁多，价格参差不齐。相较售价几十元的模拟试卷，一些试卷打出"预测"甚至"押题"的名号，价格便飙升至三四百元。 记者发现，在某考卷详情中，以2024年高考真题为例，列举了各科多道"押中"题目，可再一细看，似乎又不是那么回事。 一道数学几何题，真题为五面体，押题卷为三棱锥，题干、设问均不相同，仅因均考查了"二面角的大小"这同一个考点，就被判定为"押中"。 如此宽泛的判定，显然与我们日常的认知相去甚远。但即使这样，还是有不少家长动心了。 江西省遂川中学教师袁媛表示，不能把升学的希望寄托在这些所谓的"押题预测试卷"上。 虽然AI预测不靠谱，但也有不少老师认为AI可以有效地辅助考生靠前复习。安徽某中学政治教研组长、高三教师徐传林介绍 ...