Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the proactive trademark registration by Beijing Pop Mart Cultural Creative Co., Ltd. for "LAFUFU" to combat infringement issues [1][3]. - The trademark application is classified under fitness equipment and is currently in the substantive examination stage [1]. - The discussion around the counterfeit "Lafufu" dolls, which are being purchased at low prices on e-commerce platforms due to their limited availability abroad, has gained significant attention [2]. Group 2 - A source from Pop Mart indicated that the "Lafufu" trademark is part of a defensive strategy to better address and prevent infringement [3].

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Chuyuan Dairy Technology Co., Ltd. was fined 100,000 yuan for misleading labeling of its "Niumaijia High Calcium Milk Compound Protein Drink," which falsely advertised itself as high calcium milk despite being a plant-based protein drink with over 50% plant protein content [1][6]. Group 1: Administrative Penalty - The product in question was labeled as "High Calcium Milk Compound Protein Drink," but it does not meet the standards for milk products, which require a minimum of 80% milk content [5][6]. - The company has acknowledged the penalty and stated that the product has been removed from the market and corrective actions have been taken, but it disputes the penalty and has filed a lawsuit [2][7]. Group 2: Product Details - The drink is classified as a "compound protein drink (low sugar)" with ingredients including water, soybean paste, full-fat milk powder, and calcium carbonate, but lacks sufficient milk content to be classified as milk [3][5]. - The packaging prominently features "High Calcium Milk," which misleads consumers regarding the product's true nature [4][5]. Group 3: Trademark Issues - Beijing Chuyuan Dairy has faced multiple trademark disputes, with several of its registered trademarks being declared invalid or not registered due to similarities with existing trademarks [9][11]. - The company has a history of registering names that closely resemble well-known brands, raising concerns about potential trademark infringement and market confusion [15][16]. Group 4: Company Background - Established in 2016, Beijing Chuyuan Dairy has undergone significant changes in registered capital, reducing from 9.8 million yuan to 1 million yuan over the years [8]. - The company's shareholders have been linked to multiple companies with names similar to established brands, indicating a pattern of "brand squatting" [15][16].

Core Viewpoint - The Qinghai Province Hainan Prefecture Market Supervision Administration has been actively enforcing consumer protection laws since 2025, focusing on issues that significantly impact public welfare and safety, as evidenced by the "Guarding Consumption" campaign [1] Group 1: Enforcement Actions - The administration has conducted multiple enforcement actions against businesses selling expired food products, resulting in fines and confiscation of goods. For instance, a performance hall was fined 50,000 yuan for selling expired food [1] - A total of 15 bottles of beer were found to be expired at a performance hall, leading to administrative penalties based on violations of the Food Safety Law [1] - A supermarket in Gonghe County was fined 20,000 yuan for selling expired food, with 135 items identified as past their expiration date during inspections [3][5] Group 2: Trademark Violations - The administration has also addressed trademark infringement cases, such as a liquor store selling counterfeit "Guizhou Moutai" liquor, resulting in a fine of 21,000 yuan [2] - In another case, a well-known liquor store was fined 2,000 yuan for selling products that violated trademark rights, including a bottle of "Wuliangye" liquor [6] Group 3: Compliance Issues - Several businesses, including a daycare center, were penalized for failing to maintain proper records for food safety compliance, with fines issued for not establishing a purchase inspection record system [4] - A kindergarten was fined 5,000 yuan for using unqualified disinfected reusable dining utensils, which did not meet national safety standards [6][10]

Group 1 - The core concept of digital trademark trading involves the transfer and licensing of trademark rights, which is more efficient and transparent compared to traditional methods, leveraging technologies like blockchain and smart contracts for quick and secure ownership transfer [1][3] - Digital trademark trading is not limited by geography, allowing for global supply and demand matching [3] - Professional intellectual property service platforms, such as Youming Network, provide support in information matching, value assessment, and legal consultation, promoting industry standardization [5] Group 2 - Recent trends in digital trademark trading include technology-driven advancements, with blockchain ensuring unalterable records of trademark ownership, enhancing transaction credibility [7] - There is a growing demand for trademarks in emerging sectors like the internet, e-commerce, and the metaverse, with short domain names and brand keywords becoming popular assets [7] - Government policies are increasingly supporting intellectual property protection and optimizing transaction processes, creating a favorable environment for digital trademark trading [7] Group 3 - For entities interested in digital trademark trading, key strategies include conducting professional value assessments based on brand influence and industry scarcity [7] - Ensuring legal compliance with trademark laws and international regulations is crucial to avoid ownership disputes [7] - Choosing reliable platforms like Youming Network for industry data and transaction support can help mitigate information asymmetry risks [7] Conclusion - Digital trademark trading represents a significant innovation in the intellectual property sector, enhancing the efficiency of trademark resource allocation and providing more opportunities for corporate branding strategies [1]

南都记者从中国裁判文书网获悉，2018年，清华大学曾以"侵害商标权及不正当竞争"为由对江苏教育集 团（香港）有限公司（下称"江苏教育（香港）公司"）提起民事诉讼。清华大学诉称，其是"清华""清 华园"文字商标的注册商标专用权人，且"清华"为其有一定影响力的简称。江苏教育（香港）公司从事 教育领域的经营活动，却在其经营的网站上突出使用"清华""清华园"标识，其旗下的学校名称亦带有上 述字样，使相关公众产生混淆、误认，该行为侵犯了清华大学享有的商标权，并构成不正当竞争。 根据案件终审判决，江苏教育（香港）公司在涉案网站中多处使用带"清华园学校"字样的圆形标识以 及"想成为幸福的人首先来到清华园学校"的宣传语，在"集团特色学校""集团介绍""领导团队""集团动 态"等栏目中多处使用"清华""清华园"字样，在"江苏教育集团宣传片"及"江苏教育集团投资手册"中多处 使用"清华园学校"字样、多个清华园学校名称及学校照片，足以使相关公众对商标、商标所标示的服务 及服务提供者有所认识，上述行为已构成商标性使用。 作为同属学校教育领域的服务提供者，江苏教育（香港）公司使用的"清华园""清华园学校"标识与"清 华园"及"清华"商 ...

Core Viewpoint - Bentley has clarified that it has no association with the co-branded betel nut gift box launched by "Hecheng Tianxia," emphasizing that the product and related activities were not authorized or recognized by the Bentley brand [1][3]. Group 1: Bentley's Response - Bentley stated that the co-branded product and related activities are not affiliated with the brand or its authorized dealers in China [1]. - The brand reserves the right to take legal action to protect its legitimate rights and interests due to unauthorized use of its branding [7]. Group 2: Hecheng Tianxia's Marketing Strategy - Hecheng Tianxia has previously collaborated with luxury brands such as Rolls-Royce, Mercedes-Benz Maybach, and Porsche for promotional events [5]. - The marketing campaign for the Bentley collaboration included actors dressed as historical figures, which sparked public debate regarding the appropriateness of the partnership [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Context of Betel Nut - Betel nut has been classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the World Health Organization, with significant links to oral cancer cases [7][8]. - Recent regulations in China have restricted the sale and advertising of betel nut products, with specific prohibitions on their classification as food and advertising [8].

Core Viewpoint - TianNai Technology (688116) faces a significant setback as the National Intellectual Property Administration declared its "Cnano and logo" trademark invalid, reversing a previous court ruling in its favor [2][9]. Group 1: Trademark Dispute - The trademark dispute between TianNai Technology and Shandong Dazhan Nano Materials Co., Ltd. has been ongoing for several years, with a previous court ruling in 2023 favoring TianNai Technology [2][6]. - The National Intellectual Property Administration's recent ruling has prompted TianNai Technology to prepare for an appeal to the Beijing Intellectual Property Court [4][5]. - TianNai Technology claims that the trademark "Cnano" has established a strong association with its brand and has significant recognition in the industry [7][8]. Group 2: Market Position and Product Offerings - TianNai Technology specializes in the research, production, and application of carbon nanotubes and graphene, with products including carbon nanotube powder and conductive pastes [3]. - According to GGII statistics, TianNai Technology holds the leading market share in carbon nanotube conductive pastes, with shares of 40.3%, 46.7%, and 53.2% from 2022 to 2024, respectively [3]. Group 3: Company Strategy and Impact - The company has established a comprehensive intellectual property defense system and has registered alternative trademarks to mitigate potential impacts from the current dispute [5]. - TianNai Technology asserts that the trademark dispute will not significantly affect its core competitiveness or operational capabilities, regardless of the court's final decision [5].

Core Viewpoint - The increasing use of specific words or numbers as trademarks in the food industry raises concerns about the clarity and accuracy of product information conveyed to consumers, as exemplified by the "Duoban" (多半) trademark used by White Elephant Foods, which has led to public debate regarding its implications on product weight perception [1][2][3] Group 1: Trademark Usage and Consumer Perception - The "Duoban" trademark is registered and does not directly describe the product's weight, yet consumers interpret it as indicating a significant increase in quantity, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction [1][2] - White Elephant Foods' "Duoban" products are marketed as larger portions, but the actual weight increase is only about 25 grams compared to standard products, which does not align with consumer expectations of "more than half" [3][4] - The trademark's registration may have been facilitated by extensive marketing efforts, which have established a strong association between the term and the brand, despite its misleading implications [4][5] Group 2: Industry Implications and Regulatory Concerns - The incident highlights a broader issue in the food industry where packaging and branding often mislead consumers, leading to a loss of trust in brands and the industry as a whole [6][10] - There is a call for stricter regulations and standards regarding the use of trademarks that may mislead consumers about product attributes, emphasizing the need for clarity and accuracy in marketing [12][13] - The reliance on misleading marketing tactics can harm long-term brand loyalty and market stability, as consumers may avoid brands that they perceive as deceptive [14][15]

图片来源： OpenAI OpenAI 已从其官网和 YouTube 页面撤下了一段备受热议的视频，该视频宣传了 CEO 萨姆·阿尔特 曼，与苹果传奇设计师乔尼·艾维的友谊。顺带提及了 OpenAI 以 65 亿美元，收购艾维与阿尔特曼的 设备初创公司 io 的交易 。 这是否意味着收购计划或艾维主导 OpenAI 设计工作的安排出现了问题？据彭博社马克·古尔曼报道 ，实际情况并非如此，他表示 " 交易正在推进中，并未取消或发生任何类似情况 " 。 真正原因是法院针对 io 名称发布了禁令，迫使公司撤下所有使用该名称的宣传材料。 参考资料 https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/22/openai-pulls-promotional-materials-around-jony-ive-deal/ 编译： ChatGPT 我们正在招募新一期的实习生 -----------END----------- 我们正在寻找有创造力的00后创业者 OpenAI 随后证实了这一情况，并在原公告页面更新声明： " 由于 iyO 公司就我们使用 'io' 名称提出 的商标投诉，根据法院命令，本页面暂时关闭。 ...

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI has removed Jony Ive from its partnership section on the website due to trademark dispute issues, with both companies stating that the trademark complaint is "baseless" and will be addressed through legal means [1] Group 1 - OpenAI's action of removing Jony Ive indicates a significant response to the trademark complaint [1] - The companies involved are prepared to legally contest the trademark complaint, suggesting a potential escalation in the dispute [1]