Workflow
Consensus
icon
Search documents
X @Polygon
Polygon· 2025-08-11 14:04
Technology & Infrastructure - Polygon's Heimdall v2 reduces transaction settlement time to approximately 5 seconds [1] - Heimdall v2 is a complete consensus system overhaul based on CometBFT and Cosmos SDK [1] - The updated infrastructure aims to provide fast and stable solutions for large-scale stablecoin and tokenized asset transfers [1] Validation - Chainspect verifies the performance of Heimdall v2 [1]
X @Consensys.eth
Consensys.eth· 2025-07-18 16:56
Core Technology & Infrastructure - Decentralized trust infrastructure ensures data permanence and verifiability [1] - Ethereum facilitates mass production of digital trust through cryptography, consensus, and capital [1] Industry Outlook & Economic Impact - Digital trust, powered by Ethereum, is positioned as the future of the global economy [1]
X @CZ 🔶 BNB
CZ 🔶 BNB· 2025-07-13 09:45
BNB Chain Upgrade - BEP-593 将为 BNB Chain 带来超高效共识机制 [1] - 此次升级将实现验证器 NodeID 注册 [1] - 消息传播速度更快,延迟更低,拥塞更少 [1] Technical Improvements - BNB Chain 将通过 BEP-593 降低延迟 [1] - BNB Chain 将通过 BEP-593 减少拥塞 [1]
X @BREAD | ∑:
BREAD | ∑:· 2025-06-26 15:28
Blockchain Technology & Performance - Solana's shred processing speed (15ms) is compared to Mega's 10ms block times, highlighting the focus on transaction execution speed and state change availability in blockchain performance [1] - Solana's architecture, dealing with permissionless, randomized leaders and consensus, results in approximately 2% of shreds being untrustworthy, equating to a ~98% success rate [1] - MegaETH aims for a ~99999% reliability by offloading consensus to Ethereum, enabling immediate ingestion and presentation of state updates [4] - MegaETH is a new Ethereum L2 targeting 100k TPS and 10ms block times [6] Use Cases & Implications - Some applications can ingest shreds and present them as "true" for a snappy user experience, while others require stronger guarantees (confirmations or full finality) before presenting information, impacting the transaction lifecycle [2][3] - High-leverage or wealth-sensitive applications may not be suitable for chains with lower guarantees of finality due to the risk of acting on information that ultimately doesn't occur on-chain [2] - The 2% difference in reliability, combined with execution speed, is a key factor in attracting new builders, apps, and use cases to MegaETH [5]